Hearthstone

LiquidDeath_sl said:

Man, dog's Hunter cancer deck is fun to play.

Click to expand...

List?

Here's the list becausefuckslow decks.

It's just face hunter which is a great deck besides and I am guessing your mulligans should be for 1 drops and undertaker. If you're playing against a mage then keeping flare would be a good idea.

Interesting bit of trivia. If you attack with a weapon as a warlock, then cast jaraxxus, you can attack again because jaraxxus is a new hero.

How would you ever get a weapon as a warlock?

edit: nevermind, Cho + Claw, Bite, or Savage Roar

That is like the definition of an edge case. Neat though

Or 10 Jaraxxi:Lord Jaraxxus One Turn Kill - YouTube

Kinda new to the game. Done about 20 arenas (at a guess) via IAP and fewer non-arena games (hey, seems like playing to arena is a better way to get packs than buying packs; even if you suck, you'll get a pack + something and you'll learn how to play the damn game). Anyway, I have some decent cards now and I have a question as pertains to ranked play. To wit, is there any benefit to NOT trying ranked mode if you have no ranking? Unranked play isn't as fun as the arena, and I assume I can't rank down from default. Just wanna see what it's like and if I get my ass kicked I'll earn more cards via dailies or whatever.

You've got nothing to lose if you start in on ranked play.

Cool, thanks!

DoctorSpooge_sl said:

Cool, thanks!

Click to expand...

If you make it to rank 20 in a season you'll get a fancy card back at the end of it. Five-hundred ranked wins on a particular hero unlocks the golden version of that hero. It's all pluses for playing ranked versus unranked.

Barraco Bisi_sl said:

I've been playing HandjobLock all day today and killin' it.

Can't tell if I'm really good, the deck is OP, or the people I'm playing suck the dicks. Maybe two out of three?

Anyways, the bane of a priests existence is a 4 AP minion, and handlock is the king of pumping out the twilight drake for lulz.

Click to expand...

Handlock has weaknesses, but it's a deck that does well against a broad field because you tend not to lose to random crap like more meta-focused decks do.

littles_sl said:

Here's the list becausefuckslow decks.

It's just face hunter which is a great deck besides and I am guessing your mulligans should be for 1 drops and undertaker. If you're playing against a mage then keeping flare would be a good idea.

Click to expand...

That deck is shit, I doubt you will beat any of the new priests with that garbage.

Aggro hunter has been pretty bad since the last uth nerf, so if its just aggro hunter with new cards I imagine its pretty bad.

Control warrior 6 drops. I have 3 in mind but room for only 2. Cairne, TBK, and Sylvanas. Which two would ya'll put in a control warrior? I like Cairne as just a solid turn 6 headache for my opponent. I like Sylvanas because she can be used to solve many problems. And I like TBK because Belchers.

I'm running all 3 in my control warrior deck atm. I'm not running a spellbreaker though, if I were I would probably drop one of those 3 and I suppose it would have to be the cairne. I also don't run brawl. I personally don't like the card and think it has gotten even weaker with all the deathrattle cards.

AngryGerbil_sl said:

Control warrior 6 drops. I have 3 in mind but room for only 2. Cairne, TBK, and Sylvanas. Which two would ya'll put in a control warrior? I like Cairne as just a solid turn 6 headache for my opponent. I like Sylvanas because she can be used to solve many problems. And I like TBK because Belchers.

Click to expand...

It really depends on the meta you're dealing with at your rank in the ladder.

Sylvanas tends to do better against control decks.

TBK tends to do better if you're seeing a lot of taunt-heavy decks.

Carine is excellent value in control if you're seeing neither. He also good against some mid-range decks.

That's how I see it anyway.

edit: I should say, that's if you have to pick one. You can make the case for all three as mures suggested.