Hogwarts Legacy

Captain Suave

Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
4,784
8,096
Maybe you could find a judge stupid enough to consider a re-bound book to be a 'derivative work' but that would never survive an appeal.
If it were a derivative work that would make it even less infringing. For a derivative work you even get your own copyright on the changes. (Of course the "work" in this case would be a sculpture or something, as they're clearly not claiming the text of the story itself as a new/separate creation.)

Generally, though, you can buy, hack up, and resell whatever you like - with the notable exceptions like modding game consoles to circumvent DRM, etc.
 
Last edited:

Gavinmad

Mr. Poopybutthole
42,398
50,479
If it were a derivative work that would make it even less infringing. For a derivative work you even get your own copyright on the changes. (Of course the "work" in this case would be a sculpture or something, as they're clearly not claiming the text of the story itself as a new/separate creation.)

Generally, though, you can buy, hack up, and resell whatever you like - with the notable exceptions like modding game consoles to circumvent DRM, etc.
The copyright to a 'derivative work' belongs to the owner of the original work, not to the creator of the derivative work.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

Captain Suave

Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
4,784
8,096
The copyright to a 'derivative work' belongs to the owner of the original work, not to the creator of the derivative work.
No, it doesn't.

"Second, the derivative work itself has copyright protection. The creator of the derivative work owns the copyright to the derivative work."

The derivative work is ALSO protected under the copyright of the original work, which the original creator owns. Someone who infringed on a derivative work would be violating both copyrights. However, the derivative and the original have distinct copyrights with each creator holding ownership.

 

Gavinmad

Mr. Poopybutthole
42,398
50,479
No, it doesn't.

"Second, the derivative work itself has copyright protection. The creator of the derivative work owns the copyright to the derivative work."

The derivative work is ALSO protected under the copyright of the original work, which the original creator owns. Someone who infringed on a derivative work would be violating both copyrights. However, the derivative and the original have distinct copyrights with each creator holding ownership.

For fucks sake read the paragraph immediately above what you just copy pasted.

First, the derivative work has protection under the copyright of the original work. Copyright protection for the owner of the original copyright extends to derivative works. This means that the copyright owner of the original work also owns the rights to derivative works. Therefore, the owner of the copyright to the original work may bring a copyright infringement lawsuit against someone who creates a derivative work without permission.
 

Ambiturner

Ssraeszha Raider
16,040
19,500
No, it doesn't.

"Second, the derivative work itself has copyright protection. The creator of the derivative work owns the copyright to the derivative work."

The derivative work is ALSO protected under the copyright of the original work, which the original creator owns. Someone who infringed on a derivative work would be violating both copyrights. However, the derivative and the original have distinct copyrights with each creator holding ownership.


That's irrelevant here.

That would only apply if he was making his own copies, claiming he owns whatever changes he made, and then making a fuss if someone tried to do the same thing he's doing. Him legally buying each copy individually and selling them individually isn't a copyright violation
 

Gavinmad

Mr. Poopybutthole
42,398
50,479
S'all good. Arguing about that thing and its bookbinding is probably the most entertainment I'll ever get out of Harry Potter again.
 
  • 2Worf
  • 1Like
Reactions: 2 users

Tuco

I got Tuco'd!
<Gold Donor>
45,433
73,506
Better for the potterverse media team to make a bit stink about it as some kind of book burning, repressive thing so edgy shitlords buy three copies of hogwarts legacy instead of two.
 

ronne

Nǐ hǎo, yǒu jīn zi ma?
7,931
7,095
Don't buy this, between the absurd system requirements and the Denuvo DRM it's gonna run like dogwater on PC.

Give it 6 months and it'll be on sale for half off and Denuvo will be gone and maybe it'll work right by then
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Tuco

I got Tuco'd!
<Gold Donor>
45,433
73,506
Don't buy this, between the absurd system requirements and the Denuvo DRM it's gonna run like dogwater on PC.

Give it 6 months and it'll be on sale for half off and Denuvo will be gone and maybe it'll work right by then
It's on unreal, it's gonna run flawlessly. Just like my unreal stuff
 
  • 1Worf
  • 1Double Worf
Reactions: 1 users

Harshaw

Throbbing Member
21,540
102,805
Don't buy this, between the absurd system requirements and the Denuvo DRM it's gonna run like dogwater on PC.

Give it 6 months and it'll be on sale for half off and Denuvo will be gone and maybe it'll work right by then
That's what a tranny lover would say.
Think Stephen Colbert GIF by The Late Show With Stephen Colbert
 
  • 4Worf
  • 1Truth!
  • 1Double Worf
Reactions: 5 users

spronk

FPS noob
22,623
25,672
game will have 30 fps fidelity mode and 60 fps perf mode (with VRR) on consoles


VRR recently got added to ps5 so thats nice
 
  • 3Like
Reactions: 2 users

Soygen

The Dirty Dozen For the Price of One
<Nazi Janitors>
28,326
43,169
Guess I'm a Harry Potter fan, now. I'll buy this on PS5.

 
  • 11Worf
  • 6Like
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 18 users

Animosity

Bronze Baronet of the Realm
6,520
5,504
Im just glad to see these zealots get no support. 99.9% of the comments are people bashing them for being a moron.
 
  • 3Like
  • 1Truth!
Reactions: 3 users

Vorph

Bronze Baronet of the Realm
11,003
4,743
People still missing that the devs are just as bad...... They did everything they could to appease the degenerates, it just didn't work.
 
  • 3Like
  • 2Truth!
Reactions: 4 users

Harshaw

Throbbing Member
21,540
102,805
All the super woke shit was too late to kill Harry Potter. A large portion of gamers right now grew up with the books/movies and fell in love with it. To most logical people JK Rowling didn't say anything wrong. Deep down even the people that bow down to the mob know that the outrage is bullshit and will still play it.
 
  • 2Like
  • 1Solidarity
  • 1Truth!
Reactions: 3 users