- 31,923
- 125,224
LK-99 Room-temperature Superconductor
- Thread starter Flobee
- Start date
Void
Experiencer
- 9,425
- 11,090
Did the Navy call it the UAP Patent Package? Wouldn't that confirm the existence of NHI? What does it have to do with UAPs if they didn't say it does? Or are people just calling it that? If so, why are they calling it that? There must be some kind of reason for it, so I'd love to hear it.
- 1
- 31,923
- 125,224
Void
Experiencer
- 9,425
- 11,090
So...UFO Twitter/Reddit told you so then?
Where is this thread? It isn't the one here. I'm bored at work, and my eyes don't currently hurt, so I could probably exercise them with a little bit of excessive rolling today, so point me in the right direction, kemosabe.
- 1
- 31,923
- 125,224
I posted all of Pais patents (which you skipped or ridiculed), the articles showing the Navy investments and project titles (I think you didn't even comment that week, which is SAD) over in the crazy antigrav hubcap thread a few years ago.
Void
Experiencer
- 9,425
- 11,090
If I didn't comment for a week then I was likely on vacation, and coming back and trying to catch up I often don't comment on shit that is already old.
At my advanced age, how am I supposed to keep all of the stuff you post straight anyway? And I find it HIGHLY unlikely that I would ridicule anything you posted. You are a font of knowledge, good sir.
<thanosfineilldoitmyself.gif>
<maybe.gif>
- 1
Void
Experiencer
- 9,425
- 11,090
MusicForFish
So this is all I can find in that thread.
And another one by Nola a few posts down about triangular spacecraft. I also googled a bit, looked on that cesspool called Twitter/X and another called Reddit. The only thing I see is people calling it Navy UAP Patents or variations thereof. Nothing that justifies the name other than "oooh, spacecraft!"
I guess it would be impossible for the Navy or anyone else to come up with theoretical ideas for stuff and patent them without having some sort of NHI or wreckage or whatever feeding them ideas, huh? So it must be UAPs, hence the name Navy UAP Patents! Genius! Please enlighten me as to how I'm grievously wrong yet again, because I'm sure I am.
- 31,923
- 125,224
I may have made an error. Try UFO instead of UAP (fuck them, call it what it is). It was originally an article listed from "the drive". 2021 time frame.
So this is all I can find in that thread.
And another one by Nola a few posts down about triangular spacecraft. I also googled a bit, looked on that cesspool called Twitter/X and another called Reddit. The only thing I see is people calling it Navy UAP Patents or variations thereof. Nothing that justifies the name other than "oooh, spacecraft!"
I guess it would be impossible for the Navy or anyone else to come up with theoretical ideas for stuff and patent them without having some sort of NHI or wreckage or whatever feeding them ideas, huh? So it must be UAPs, hence the name Navy UAP Patents! Genius! Please enlighten me as to how I'm grievously wrong yet again, because I'm sure I am.
Void
Experiencer
- 9,425
- 11,090
I did that too. And I have seen that article. So essentially they are just calling them UFO/UAP patents because they are theoretical and would require technology that we currently do not have in order to actually work. That happens all the time, we just don't get all retarded and call them UAP patents. Someone gets a bright idea and says IF we could insert 1.21 gigawatts of power instantaneously while driving at 88 mph, we could travel through time, and I'm gonna patent that idea. Doesn't mean it actually works, but if it DOES, that smooth mothafucka has the patent!
The way that Tweet referred to them, as evidenced by both my and Tuco's reactions, implied that there was an actual link to UAPs in those patents. There is not. So why make that Tweet except to infer that the superconductor guys might have their hands on alien technology, or at least hints of it? I cannot see any other reason to make that statement except to contribute to the UAP hype currently infesting the world.
- 31,923
- 125,224
Palum
what Suineg set it to
- 23,439
- 33,679
Omg omg omg it's confirmed!!! iFL
www.tomshardware.com
Oh I mean it's been replicated again buuuut that it's not room temperature superconducting.
Scramble to Validate Superconductor Breakthrough Confirms Zero Resistance, With a Catch
Zero resistance is replicated, but room temperature operation is not.
www.tomshardware.com
Oh I mean it's been replicated again buuuut that it's not room temperature superconducting.
- 1
Ravishing
Uninspiring Title
- 8,452
- 3,577
Omg omg omg it's confirmed!!! iFL
Scramble to Validate Superconductor Breakthrough Confirms Zero Resistance, With a Catch
Zero resistance is replicated, but room temperature operation is not.
Oh I mean it's been replicated again buuuut that it's not room temperature superconducting.
Still has potential
Current MRI machines need to operate at -296C
New material that only needs to be -163C would be a nice improvement.
Still many questions to answer and a ton of research to be done.
- 2
Palum
what Suineg set it to
- 23,439
- 33,679
It's actually pretty huge because you can only achieve -296C with liquid Helium. -196C is liquid Nitrogen which is far more convenient and basically in infinite supply. We're actually in some danger of globally running out of He in the coming decades.
- 4
Palum
what Suineg set it to
- 23,439
- 33,679
So you're saying some existing technologies might actually become slightly more efficient after decades of research if there are billions in investments? Tell me more of this wunderwaffe
- 1
You don't know what's there or not there until you look. A true room-temp superconductor would be world-changing. It might be possible, so we look. On the way, we've made some things better.
Most progress is incremental.
- 1
Palum
what Suineg set it to
- 23,439
- 33,679
Ok so there's a possibility this 25 year long project might incrementally improve things?
- 3
- 1
Palum
what Suineg set it to
- 23,439
- 33,679
