I guess all this time i spend designing shit for the 0.01% event makes we really want to just prevent the 0.01% event. Here we can, but don't because... i don't know.
May users have a personal thread in the rickshaw?
- Thread starter Wintermute
- Start date
- Status
I guess all this time i spend designing shit for the 0.01% event makes we really want to just prevent the 0.01% event. Here we can, but don't because... i don't know.
- 518
- 210
I do not care if someone wants to be a <insert whatever sort of wanker/gash> they want in a sandbox. We are all grown up MORE or LESS ..... RIGHT??
I voted yes.
What is the harm in letting children play in a sandbox? Especially adult children? Give a voice to all, no need to gag anyone by dafault IMHO. If there is one, a REAL and MATURE. practical reason, other than personal like/dislike, so be it.
Revisit at ANY time though, at the discretion of Suni/admins/mods. ONLY Their discretion if they feel it is too much trouble cleaning and replacing the sand because of too many children are soilingor throwing it out of the sandbox, because THEY are in chaaarge.
IMHO Someone HAS to be in REAL charge because nobody will have the #$&$#% fooking patience to micromanage a whiny bitchocracy with so many crybabies here.
To those complaining so much about Suni, I humbly ask you PLEASE contemplate this seriously: Who here DOES have the patience to do the above ?
I voted yes.
What is the harm in letting children play in a sandbox? Especially adult children? Give a voice to all, no need to gag anyone by dafault IMHO. If there is one, a REAL and MATURE. practical reason, other than personal like/dislike, so be it.
Revisit at ANY time though, at the discretion of Suni/admins/mods. ONLY Their discretion if they feel it is too much trouble cleaning and replacing the sand because of too many children are soilingor throwing it out of the sandbox, because THEY are in chaaarge.
IMHO Someone HAS to be in REAL charge because nobody will have the #$&$#% fooking patience to micromanage a whiny bitchocracy with so many crybabies here.
To those complaining so much about Suni, I humbly ask you PLEASE contemplate this seriously: Who here DOES have the patience to do the above ?
- 18,873
- 67,979
Zaide
TLP Idealist
- 3,747
- 4,406
Yeah I think thread banning is a good option here. It's less severe overall which means you can make it longer. Rather than a 3 day RRP maybe a 10 day thread ban. If someone gets retarded you've still got RRP and other avenues available.
- 3
pharmakos
soʞɐɯɹɐɥd
- 16,306
- -2,236
in a way i sympathize / can relate to tanoomba. anyone on this board that doesn't follow the Atheism thread is probably pretty confused about why there's a lot of people here that dislike me. a difference might be that i feel a little ashamed for some of the stupid last-wordism arguments i've gotten into in that thread, and i've since corrected my behavior. but still.
the way someone acts in one thread isn't reflective of their behavior overall, and its part of why its awesome that xenforo has a threadban feature.
the way someone acts in one thread isn't reflective of their behavior overall, and its part of why its awesome that xenforo has a threadban feature.
- 3
- 1
hodj
Vox Populi Jihadi
- 31,672
- 18,377
Tanoomba doesn't just do that shit in the Gamergate thread
Again speaking from your ignorance.
Tanoomba's antics started almost the moment he appeared, in particular in the Trayvon Martin threads back in the first summer Rerolled existed.
We're on year 4 of this shit, and he only gets worse as time goes on.
Not better.
Again speaking from your ignorance.
Tanoomba's antics started almost the moment he appeared, in particular in the Trayvon Martin threads back in the first summer Rerolled existed.
We're on year 4 of this shit, and he only gets worse as time goes on.
Not better.
Brikker
Trump's Staff
- 6,121
- 4,506
such rampant and hodj-like threats of abuse.
also it is the best and lulziest option.
- 2
DickTrickle
Definitely NOT Furor Planedefiler
- 12,973
- 14,880
As a general statement, I too support temporary thread bans where applicable.
- 1
Sterling
El Presidente
- 12,994
- 7,898
Well some threads are much better when people don't have the ability to edit their posts.
- 2
Zapatta
Krugman's Fax Machine
- 76,330
- 397,048
- 518
- 210
Seconded, fantastic job indeed Suni!
Do not burn out on the tards!
If the tards raid and soil the sandbox, as Picasso says, just change whatever you NEED to change! DUMP the sand without making anyone need to wade into it. Keep things sane for the REST of the 99% people that VALUE admins and mods work!! Executive powers, seriously. Keep your workload manageable and do not be wieghted down playing democracy games because of tards. The hard work and time shows and is appreciated!
- 1
Feanor
Karazhan Raider
- 7,766
- 35,304
Well some threads are much better when people don't have the ability to edit their posts.
- 2
Daezuel
Potato del Grande
- 22,922
- 48,476
That's what I'm saying, no need to fuck with the Jugs playground. Come up with better punishments. This was a big reason I was fed up with Tuco's approach to habitual thread derailers. (though to be fair he has the right stance on the Shaw)
Thread banning seems like a good solution, if they don't get the hint from that, and they won't, push up the punishment to discouraged poster.
There has to be some solution to people ruining threads, but it shouldn't be something that ruins other posters enjoyment of an area of the forums.
Thread banning seems like a good solution, if they don't get the hint from that, and they won't, push up the punishment to discouraged poster.
There has to be some solution to people ruining threads, but it shouldn't be something that ruins other posters enjoyment of an area of the forums.
Tuco
I got Tuco'd!
- 45,485
- 73,570
Who says I am defending him?
Do you feel like your new stance on the ignore feature leads you to believe that moderators should be more hands on in this community?
- Status