Yeah, no.I'm not saying I'm an authority on whether Mao was a Communist or not, but he wasn't a communist
Yeah, no.I'm not saying I'm an authority on whether Mao was a Communist or not, but he wasn't a communist
And then he's selectively only looking at the outcomes, then ex post facto rewriting Mao's intentions. So yes, he is claiming to be inside Mao's head, when he claims Mao was using it as propaganda but didn't really act it out.He wasn't speaking on Mao's inner mind, only the actions which, according to you are in accordance with Marxist theory, but according to Dumar and the leading scholar's on the subject weren't in accordance with Marxist theory. Why should I, as a neutral, objective observer to this battle royal, take your word for it over more credentialed authorities?
I WANT a long post. Don't link anything, tell me your platform. I want to vote you, give me a reason.Do you mind a long post?
Clearly Dumar is much more educated in the hard sciences that Hodj prizes so much over everything else.No! That's the wrong class. Are you gonna continue to be a noshow? And my class is free.
If you need help, let me know. Four calc classes and differential equations later, I still remember the lowly derivative!
I think you are confusing intentions with outcomes. I don't think Team Commie ever made the claim that Mao's or Stalin's INTENTIONS were anything other than Marxist, only that the OUTCOME was anything but. Huge difference there.Dumar wants to claim that because the outcome was bad, there is no way the intentions could have been communist in nature.
The best part is watching Hodj commit all the same fallacies that he accuses others of using.I think you are confusing intentions with outcomes. I don't think Team Commie ever made the claim that Mao's or Stalin's INTENTIONS were anything other than Marxist, only that the OUTCOME was anything but. Huge difference there.
So you haven't read the thread very well.I think you are confusing intentions with outcomes. I don't think Team Commie ever made the claim that Mao's or Stalin's INTENTIONS were anything other than Marxist, only that the OUTCOME was anything but. Huge difference there.
I'll try my spoilered best.Anyway, I will give you time. I have to run some errands.
Yes. I said it three or four times already. You can't know Mao's thoughts. Maybe he earnestly believed his policies were communist, who knows. But my opinion is that he was invoking Marx for his own personal gain, much like Stalin.TheBeagle_sl said:I think you are confusing intentions with outcomes. I don't think Team Commie ever made the claim that Mao's or Stalin's INTENTIONS were anything other than Marxist, only that the OUTCOME was anything but. Huge difference there.
Cite some.The best part is watching Hodj commit all the same fallacies that he accuses others of using.
Uh, yeah you have. Multiple times over said that you know Mao's thoughts.I'll try my spoilered best.
Yes. I said it three or four times already. You can't know Mao's thoughts. .
WHY were those policies being enforced Dumar?Their intentions don't much matter when they enforce a policy of forced labor, forced occupation, and terror in their governance.
Bro, I'm not that invested enough into this to comb through 1,000 posts over the last few days.Cite some.
Start citing them.
Last time I asked you for citations you disappeared for over an hour so I'll be waiting with baited breath for you to fail to deliver any citations again.
Actually I think I was wrong on that. It wasn't the Catalonians.Why even Araysar two nights ago showed that the Catalonians had terror squads out slaughtering.