NFL Postseason 2017 - Where Romo Gets His Ring

Daezuel

Daezuel

Potato del Grande
22,914
48,442
Well, first they called a horseshit defenseless receiver penalty that was not even a fucking hit, then Brady fumbled, Steelers recovered, they review the tape and give the ball to the Patriots.

To clear up confusion on the Tom Brady fumble: There was in fact a fumble. But referee Terry McAulay ruled that there was no clear Steelers recovery, reverting the ball to the Patriots. And the replay did not show any conclusive evidence of a Steelers recovery, even though it was clear that Brady fumbled. So, the ruling on the field stood.
Click to expand...

/eyeroll
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
A

Alpha

Bronze Knight of the Realm
148
14
There weren't any bad calls, but there are some haters in the forum who want to pretend that they are NFL officials.
 
  • 4Cutler
  • 2Like
Reactions: 5 users
Genjiro

Genjiro

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
5,218
5,066
Yea even Simms and Nantz mentioned the ref said there was a clear recovery before the fumble, but they ruled him down. Then when its shown hes not down, they have to say there was no clear recovery.
 
Dioblaire

Dioblaire

And now my Watch has ended...
<Donor>
1,841
452
Alpha said:
There weren't any bad calls, but there are some haters in the forum who want to pretend that they are NFL officials.
Click to expand...

Oh dear god, another Pats fan coming out of the wood works.
 
  • 2Solidarity
Reactions: 1 users
T

Tenks

Bronze Knight of the Realm
14,163
606
Alpha said:
There weren't any bad calls, but there are some haters in the forum who want to pretend that they are NFL officials.
Click to expand...

Listen I hate the Steelers. But when the tape shows a clear fumble and a Steeler emerges from the pile with the ball that seems like a pretty fucking clear-cut case of "Steelers recovered the fumble."
 
  • 2Solidarity
Reactions: 1 users
You must log in or register to reply here.