Robert Baratheon_sl
shitlord
- 1,658
- 0
Didn't matter anyway, the cup finals were already played between the hawks and kings.Refs decided this one. I need to find some water-tight boxes.
I had hope, man. HOPE.Didn't matter anyway, the cup finals were already played between the hawks and kings.
What an original AND logical statement. You should be a sports writer!Didn't matter anyway, the cup finals were already played between the hawks and kings.
Yeah, basically. Unless he intentionally gets in a player's way, even outside of the crease he's untouchable. And I agree that the third LA goal probably shouldn't have counted. There's some argument that the Rangers D hit King (I think it was him) in to Lundqvist, and I would imagine that's what the explanation on the ice was, but what should have happened was a no-goal call and face-off outside the zone, with no penalty. I don't really blame the ref though, at full game speed that shit is a very difficult call to make.So even if the goalie is out of the crease and handling the puck, you still can't touch him?
Not embedding due to size (~4MB)Yeah, basically. Unless he intentionally gets in a player's way, even outside of the crease he's untouchable. And I agree that the third LA goal probably shouldn't have counted. There's some argument that the Rangers D hit King (I think it was him) in to Lundqvist, and I would imagine that's what the explanation on the ice was, but what should have happened was a no-goal call and face-off outside the zone, with no penalty. I don't really blame the ref though, at full game speed that shit is a very difficult call to make.