Merrith
Golden Baronet of the Realm
- 18,816
- 7,383
It may be a thing forever but doesnt mean it shouldnt be talked about or changed. If theres a penalty call it. If there is dont. Ticky tack bullshit like this swings games. And now that the league is involved in gambling it makes the product look rigged.
I just don't think any amount of it will change it. Often times they will use a make up call to try and "correct" a ticky tack call from earlier in the game. Which is stupid. I don't think it should imply more "rigged" outcomes, just the idea that if they called a poor penalty in the 1st period on one team and it resulted in a PP goal for the opposition, they're obviously going to try and look for the potential opportunity to call one the other way.
Maybe I've just watched hockey for too long that I'm desensitized from it all. Can't tell you how many times when the Caps had one of the top PP's in the league and we go 1 for 1 or 2 for 2 early in a game, and it was just completely obvious that we weren't going to get another call the rest of the game. Also obvious calls when a team is up like 4-0 that just go uncalled. These have all been in effect for a long time, I'm not sure anything will change even with this incident.