Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow (2026)

jayrebb

Ssraeszha Raider
16,400
16,250
That whole ship went wrong the moment JJ wrote a script where Luke, Leia and Han would never be in a scene together and that script got the okay from Kathleen Kennedy and presumably Bob Iger.

They rejected dozens of JJ's drafts. The story board kept sending it back with no notes on it-- with "try again" as the only direction he was given by Lucas Film.

Finally him and Terrio said fuck it, and erased anything to do with Luke or the original cast. Luke had a bigger role in TFA initially and was asked to get in shape for action. The woke Lucas Film committee stonewalled him.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

spronk

FPS noob
24,835
31,271
supergirls audience was like 68% men, so its men's fault the movie didn't do better just like the WNBA stadium numbers lol

but yeah its so obvious in hindsight, a movie that NEEDS teenage girls and young women to come does absolutely the wrong things to market to that audience. superman 2025 was about hope and optimism and a naive superman being a midwestern guy basically. not a great movie but had the right "vibe" for what it was going for and women didn't say no when guys wanted to go.

this movie is about a chick who is basically clinically depressed, parties hard to numb herself, and then her dog is gonna die unless she saves him? Like holy shit you tell any woman who isn't mentally ill thats the story and they will swipe left faster than on a fat guy on tinder.

shoulda done a batman movie next obviously but if they had to stick to supergirl, it should also have been a movie about hope and plucky girl coming to terms with her power and finding best superpowered friends (bitches love fake friends) and two hot guys who are into her (100% required for any chick flick), momoa as a hot shirtless surfer and jacob ellordi as frankenstein or some shit, i dunno. that would have brought the ladies.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Harshaw

Throbbing Member
34,452
209,683
lol WTF I don't even remember hearing about morbius. I assumed it was another new film. Is morbius a DC character?
Marvel character owned by Sony ATM. The character itself is fine, Sony just failed on all their Spidey spin off attempts.
 

Goatface

Naxxramas 1.0 Raider
11,797
23,388
with a monday surge in striking distance of passing morbius
1782853369145.png
 

lgarthy

<Silver Donator>
3,478
15,143
Okay-- SPOILERS -- ahead....

I have been thinking and talking with the woman I saw Supergirl with most of the day.

A real SHITTY movie can't really do that. But I am FURIOUS and convinced that they subverted and ruined the entire film in the last few minutes to make a worthless, marketing, cross-promotion.

If you give a crap about my obsessive thoughts on this-- SPOILER WARNING!!!!:

Everyone leaving the Theatre could’ve left with the feeling of personal growth, relationship growth, maybe even lesbian relationship growth, friendship, goodness, and that Supergirl is willing to cross lines. Superman never will. Instead, the feeling you get leaving the film is there was no growth just marketing.awful

The culinary equivalent would be to finish off a fresh Japanese tuna dinner with urine soaked shark meat from Iceland.

I’m so infuriated. growth, redemption, vindication, sacrifice, altruism, love, washed away for stupidity and cross-marketing.

an argument of patriarchy and defeating the “male gaze.“ Should be enough. They were very adapt at choosing not the “hot girl“ to be super girl, but the rebel girl and the sacrifice of her “goodness“ to preserve the goodness of someone she loves is a poignant and powerful ending, and I didn’t see that coming. And then they fucked it all up.

The casting and character setup were incredibly deliberate. By choosing Milly Alcock—who brought a raw, jagged, and rebellious "un-Hollywood" energy—the film set itself up to completely subvert the standard "male gaze" and the classic, sexualized tropes of female superheroes. Alcock herself even noted in press interviews that the film's beauty lay in how it refused to center itself around a man

(CosmicBookNews). [1 (), 2 (Fox News insists on being the villain in another superhero’s story), 3 (CosmicBookNews), 4 (Blood Simple (1984)), 5 (GateBuster Review: The Wasp Woman)

The sacrifice of her "goodness" was a massive thematic triumph. Kara making the conscious, harrowing decision to stab Krem in order to absorb the moral trauma and preserve the childhood innocence of Ruthye. She wasn't fighting for male approval or code-enforcement; she crossed a line out of raw, sacrificial love.

The film proved she was stronger, more resilient, and willing to carry heavier burdens than Superman ever could. Forcing her into his shadow in the final moments didn't just hurt the pacing; it actively insulted the entire feminist text the first two hours built. They built a rebel who defeated the gaze, only to force her to her knees in the final four minutes to serve a male-led franchise. It is a total narrative betrayal.

Even if you could give a shit about female empowerment or feminism or any of that crap-- Having a powerful, morally complex, rebellious woman exist autonomously in deep space after committing an execution was too terrifying for the studio. They immediately felt the need to bring her back to Earth to be supervised, anchored, and domesticated by a male authority figure-- INSULTING and STUPID!

Again, whether you give two shits about feminism or avoiding "the male gaze" what they did at the end if the film would be like ending Thelma and Louise with T&L performing felatio on police to get out of going to jail...


They really FUCKED up a potentially poignant ending for cross-marketing BULLSHIT.

There- I've shot my film critic load. It bothered me all day.
 
  • 2WTF
Reactions: 1 users

M Power

Silver Knight of the Realm
496
517
View attachment 632782

I really like Brick but it's a noir detective thriller reskinned as a high school drama (or the reverse depending on how you look at it). It's very well made but nothing about it says "let this guy write and direct Star Wars." Looper is a fantasy story pretending it's science fiction. It's loaded with contrivances and magic. I would consider it as a strike agaisnt him being handed Star Wars.

If you're going to go forward with Super Girl after watching The Marvels and Madam Web eat shit and after the entire last decade of girl power media than it better be something fun and light. It better have an audience ready to go. Instead they blew 270 million goddamn dollars to tell a violent sex trafficker story. Taking in 37 million domestic for a summer weekend is a total disaster. It's going to do a a tenth of that this weekend and be done.
Rian Johnson is/was carried by Joseph Gordon Levitt who has himself fallen off from popularity (thankfully because he's a commie faggot). Which is sad because I really liked him as a young actor and his role choice was fantastic. His indie film career was amazing in the 2000's.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

Bald Brah

Vyemm Raider
2,630
3,034
Rian Johnson is/was carried by Joseph Gordon Levitt who has himself fallen off from popularity (thankfully because he's a commie faggot). Which is sad because I really liked him as a young actor and his role choice was fantastic. His indie film career was amazing in the 2000's.

I always thought he was the faggot in Ozark and Iron Fist but apparently that's a different faggot named Tom Pelphry
 

Gutterflesh

Parody Account
<Gold Donor>
10,809
59,619
The only people seeing this in the theater are Reddit trannies that work in movie theaters and the morbidly curious. Hell of a demographic to target, you marketing geniuses.

 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Intrinsic

Person of Whiteness
<Gold Donor>
17,100
17,449
Okay-- SPOILERS -- ahead....

I have been thinking and talking with the woman I saw Supergirl with most of the day.

A real SHITTY movie can't really do that. But I am FURIOUS and convinced that they subverted and ruined the entire film in the last few minutes to make a worthless, marketing, cross-promotion.

If you give a crap about my obsessive thoughts on this-- SPOILER WARNING!!!!:

Everyone leaving the Theatre could’ve left with the feeling of personal growth, relationship growth, maybe even lesbian relationship growth, friendship, goodness, and that Supergirl is willing to cross lines. Superman never will. Instead, the feeling you get leaving the film is there was no growth just marketing.awful

The culinary equivalent would be to finish off a fresh Japanese tuna dinner with urine soaked shark meat from Iceland.

I’m so infuriated. growth, redemption, vindication, sacrifice, altruism, love, washed away for stupidity and cross-marketing.

an argument of patriarchy and defeating the “male gaze.“ Should be enough. They were very adapt at choosing not the “hot girl“ to be super girl, but the rebel girl and the sacrifice of her “goodness“ to preserve the goodness of someone she loves is a poignant and powerful ending, and I didn’t see that coming. And then they fucked it all up.

The casting and character setup were incredibly deliberate. By choosing Milly Alcock—who brought a raw, jagged, and rebellious "un-Hollywood" energy—the film set itself up to completely subvert the standard "male gaze" and the classic, sexualized tropes of female superheroes. Alcock herself even noted in press interviews that the film's beauty lay in how it refused to center itself around a man

(CosmicBookNews). [1 (), 2 (Fox News insists on being the villain in another superhero’s story), 3 (CosmicBookNews), 4 (Blood Simple (1984)), 5 (GateBuster Review: The Wasp Woman)

The sacrifice of her "goodness" was a massive thematic triumph. Kara making the conscious, harrowing decision to stab Krem in order to absorb the moral trauma and preserve the childhood innocence of Ruthye. She wasn't fighting for male approval or code-enforcement; she crossed a line out of raw, sacrificial love.

The film proved she was stronger, more resilient, and willing to carry heavier burdens than Superman ever could. Forcing her into his shadow in the final moments didn't just hurt the pacing; it actively insulted the entire feminist text the first two hours built. They built a rebel who defeated the gaze, only to force her to her knees in the final four minutes to serve a male-led franchise. It is a total narrative betrayal.

Even if you could give a shit about female empowerment or feminism or any of that crap-- Having a powerful, morally complex, rebellious woman exist autonomously in deep space after committing an execution was too terrifying for the studio. They immediately felt the need to bring her back to Earth to be supervised, anchored, and domesticated by a male authority figure-- INSULTING and STUPID!

Again, whether you give two shits about feminism or avoiding "the male gaze" what they did at the end if the film would be like ending Thelma and Louise with T&L performing felatio on police to get out of going to jail...


They really FUCKED up a potentially poignant ending for cross-marketing BULLSHIT.

There- I've shot my film critic load. It bothered me all day.

Confused Michael Jordan GIF
 
  • 1Solidarity
  • 1Worf
Reactions: 1 users

Gravel

Mr. Poopybutthole
47,675
172,686
Okay-- SPOILERS -- ahead....

I have been thinking and talking with the woman I saw Supergirl with most of the day.

A real SHITTY movie can't really do that. But I am FURIOUS and convinced that they subverted and ruined the entire film in the last few minutes to make a worthless, marketing, cross-promotion.

If you give a crap about my obsessive thoughts on this-- SPOILER WARNING!!!!:

Everyone leaving the Theatre could’ve left with the feeling of personal growth, relationship growth, maybe even lesbian relationship growth, friendship, goodness, and that Supergirl is willing to cross lines. Superman never will. Instead, the feeling you get leaving the film is there was no growth just marketing.awful

The culinary equivalent would be to finish off a fresh Japanese tuna dinner with urine soaked shark meat from Iceland.

I’m so infuriated. growth, redemption, vindication, sacrifice, altruism, love, washed away for stupidity and cross-marketing.

an argument of patriarchy and defeating the “male gaze.“ Should be enough. They were very adapt at choosing not the “hot girl“ to be super girl, but the rebel girl and the sacrifice of her “goodness“ to preserve the goodness of someone she loves is a poignant and powerful ending, and I didn’t see that coming. And then they fucked it all up.

The casting and character setup were incredibly deliberate. By choosing Milly Alcock—who brought a raw, jagged, and rebellious "un-Hollywood" energy—the film set itself up to completely subvert the standard "male gaze" and the classic, sexualized tropes of female superheroes. Alcock herself even noted in press interviews that the film's beauty lay in how it refused to center itself around a man

(CosmicBookNews). [1 (), 2 (Fox News insists on being the villain in another superhero’s story), 3 (CosmicBookNews), 4 (Blood Simple (1984)), 5 (GateBuster Review: The Wasp Woman)

The sacrifice of her "goodness" was a massive thematic triumph. Kara making the conscious, harrowing decision to stab Krem in order to absorb the moral trauma and preserve the childhood innocence of Ruthye. She wasn't fighting for male approval or code-enforcement; she crossed a line out of raw, sacrificial love.

The film proved she was stronger, more resilient, and willing to carry heavier burdens than Superman ever could. Forcing her into his shadow in the final moments didn't just hurt the pacing; it actively insulted the entire feminist text the first two hours built. They built a rebel who defeated the gaze, only to force her to her knees in the final four minutes to serve a male-led franchise. It is a total narrative betrayal.

Even if you could give a shit about female empowerment or feminism or any of that crap-- Having a powerful, morally complex, rebellious woman exist autonomously in deep space after committing an execution was too terrifying for the studio. They immediately felt the need to bring her back to Earth to be supervised, anchored, and domesticated by a male authority figure-- INSULTING and STUPID!

Again, whether you give two shits about feminism or avoiding "the male gaze" what they did at the end if the film would be like ending Thelma and Louise with T&L performing felatio on police to get out of going to jail...


They really FUCKED up a potentially poignant ending for cross-marketing BULLSHIT.

There- I've shot my film critic load. It bothered me all day.

The fuck kind of review is this? That may be the gayest movie review I've ever seen on these forums. I'm not saying you've got no right to have the opinion the movie isn't bad (I'm not claiming otherwise and never will because I'll never watch this), but...what?
 
  • 2Solidarity
  • 1Like
  • 1Worf
Reactions: 3 users