Superman: Legacy (2025)

Phazael

Confirmed Beta Shitlord, Fat Bastard
<Gold Donor>
15,287
33,687
I don't get all the edge lording on this, but it was not spectacular either. Honestly the missed opportunity here is is they in fact are retconning the Kryptonians as conquerors, why not use the Power Girl version of Supergirl. She is way more interesting than Kara Danvers version and would fit the changes better, since she actually sees herself as a warrior persona. There is a ton of material they can draw from that has never been done in movies or TV before.

Anyhow, the main movie itself was fine. God Mode superman has been done to death and seeing him able to get his ass kicked adds more dramatic tension to the movie. The biggest flaw is that Guy and Mr Terrific really stole the show here. This probably needed to be two movies, one focusing on Superman and Lex and the other on the Justice Gang.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Wombat

Trakanon Raider
2,485
1,167
But as a reminder, GotG 3 didn't have a single character in it not from Gunn's movies - there was no contribution from the MCU.

Domestically, Superman's actually been doing very well over the weekdays as well. It probably won't hit the domestic $340M of Thor 4, to say nothing of the $370M of The Batman, but it probably will top the $280M of Sinners and whatever Jurassic 7 ends up at ($300M?)

Worldwide is different story. While it will overtake the Marvel movies, I don't know if it will overtake Jurassic 7, or even MI:8.

I'm just not optimistic for Fantastic Four. The last FF was a disaster from day one, and this one gets no contribution from MCU characters. While it's true that ticket sales don't care about demographics, and boomers wanting to see 'the 60s' count as much as kids, I honestly don't know if it will beat out Captain Falcon, either Worldwide or Domestic.
 

Sylas

<Gold Donor>
4,635
6,489
GoTG 3 was a sucess
If by success you mean box office failure then sure. I think with international it may have come close to breaking even within 50-100mil but for sure nobody made any money from it.
Worldwide is different story. While it will overtake the Marvel movies, I don't know if it will overtake Jurassic 7, or even MI:8.
Worldwide isnt a different story, ww is going to be much worse. It isnt going to do shit to help superman, he's a mainly American character and he doesn't do well internationally. Man of Steel made only 66mil in China and that was considered a bust at the time. Gunns superman debuted in China on 45k screens, he heavily marketed it there and it came in 4th place, is looking to only make 10mil total in its entire run there. FYI the #1 movie in the world in 2025 is Chinese Ne Zha 2 its made 2bil earlier this year. Right now #1 is the latest jurassic park sequel.

I think it will end just about what it is now, 66% domestic and 33% international. Maybe 500-550 ww. Against a reported 225mil budget and another 200mil marketing. Its not going to be snow white or the marvels bad but its definitely going to be another flop.
 

moonarchia

The Scientific Shitlord
<Bronze Donator>
25,991
48,343
Power Girl
20230602_DC_News_PowerGirl5.jpg


*fapfapfapfap*
 
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 1 user

Homsar

Silver Baronet of the Realm
9,990
9,025
If by success you mean box office failure then sure. I think with international it may have come close to breaking even within 50-100mil but for sure nobody made any money from it.

Worldwide isnt a different story, ww is going to be much worse. It isnt going to do shit to help superman, he's a mainly American character and he doesn't do well internationally. Man of Steel made only 66mil in China and that was considered a bust at the time. Gunns superman debuted in China on 45k screens, he heavily marketed it there and it came in 4th place, is looking to only make 10mil total in its entire run there. FYI the #1 movie in the world in 2025 is Chinese Ne Zha 2 its made 2bil earlier this year. Right now #1 is the latest jurassic park sequel.

I think it will end just about what it is now, 66% domestic and 33% international. Maybe 500-550 ww. Against a reported 225mil budget and another 200mil marketing. Its not going to be snow white or the marvels bad but its definitely going to be another flop.
How was GoTG3 a failure?
 

Sylas

<Gold Donor>
4,635
6,489
It cost 250mil plus estimated 150mil marketing = 400mil cost

It made 359mil domestic x 50% = 180mil
Plus 486mil international x 35% = 170mil
Total = 350 mil?

Again approx, domestic take is typically 50% (slightly more opening week but less and less each week, average 50%) and because international box office varies by country and by week between 20-40% so using 35% for the high end.

Like I said it was close to breaking even, maybe it even did depending on the international math(but probably shy 50-100mil) but it didn't make anyone any money.

It was a failure if you finance films in order to make a profit. If you are just adding to your portfolio so that you can leverage yourself to take over running your main rivals Cinematic universe you can argue it was a great success.
 

Homsar

Silver Baronet of the Realm
9,990
9,025
It definitely didn't lose money and was one of the highest grossing movies that year. It literally lost to Barbie and Oppenheimer
 

Sylas

<Gold Donor>
4,635
6,489
Gross /= profit sir

It definitely broke even at best but more than likely lost money. Im sure with jew math and tax credits the studio can argue anything but the man who invested in the film got back less than he put in, ie he lost money.

It's one in a long line of lessons, stop spending ~half a billion dollars on giant tent pole comic book films.

Edit: glad you brought up Oppenheimer that's a great example.
100mil budget + 100mil marketing = 200mil cost
Domestic 330mil x 50% = 165mil
International 645mil x 35% = 225mil
Total 390 mil

Do you see how 390 is a bigger number than the 200? If I loan you 200 dollars and you pay me back 390 dollars 6 months later then i made a profit. If i loan you 400 dollars and you hand me back 350 6 months later i lost money. That's how math works.
 
Last edited:

Juvarisx

Florida
4,617
5,252
It definitely didn't lose money and was one of the highest grossing movies that year. It literally lost to Barbie and Oppenheimer

Can't fix retarded, dont bother. Deadline tracks all this shit. Making 125 million in profit post covid gets the cocaine and escorts flowing.

1752859980956.png
 

Sylas

<Gold Donor>
4,635
6,489
Lol, jew math and home box office/streaming. How much d+ they want to attribute to a single film? It's irrelevant we're talking about box office where you can't fudge the numbers to save face.

Interestingly my numbers almost perfectly match those.
 

Juvarisx

Florida
4,617
5,252
Lol, jew math and home box office/streaming. Interestingly my numbers almost perfectly match those.

Yes literally how profit is tracked, congrats. Same reason they are not worried about Global Box Office form Superman cause they are going to speed run it to PVOD and make another couple hundred million. black to ignore you go.
 

Sylas

<Gold Donor>
4,635
6,489
Oh no a retarded faggot has me on ignore. whatever shall I do? I guess I'll just keep dunking on you. Did you even consider the 13% of Disney park attendees who came specifically for the new gotg3 ride? So what that ride cost 50mil, ill ignore the cost and only count the profits. Clearly we can squeeze out more numbers to cover for our failures.
Herea a hint, All streaming numbers are negative since they cost more than the revenue they bring in. They didn't magically make 300mil extra dollars on gotg3, gotg3s share of Disney plus is measured in losses.


:emoji_fork_knife_plate::emoji_poop::emoji_coffin::emoji_gay_pride_flag:
 
  • 1Picard
Reactions: 1 user

Sylas

<Gold Donor>
4,635
6,489
1000003367.jpg


Guys all of disney+, Hulu, and ESPN made only 293 million in profit in 2023 and literally every single cent of that and more (300mil) is directly attributed to gotg3 according to some retarded faggot in this thread.

I mean, disney+ itself is a net negative it loses money, but gotg3 magically pulled out 300mil in streaming and vod.
 

Juvarisx

Florida
4,617
5,252
You've hit a very special kind of low when Sylas is less wrong than you are.

All I am reading is a sperglord who doesnt understand how studios make money on streaming rights when it comes to platforms the company owns.

1752862563549.png


So yes Disney sold D+ the streaming rights to the film for $180 in hopes of driving subs (how many IDK im sure there is some investor info on that), but thats literally how it works. How do I know?

1752862543591.png


or

1752862618120.png


or

Welcome to Hollywood accounting. D+ takes a loss but the movie makes profit adn everyone wins cause D+ is a loss leader. What a fucking concept. They could have sold the streaming rights to Netflix or whatever for more maybe but doing it within their own ecosystem lets them double dip and generate more overall. Wonder why those DCU movies pop up on Peacock or Netflix? Cause those rights get sold for a time and WB makes mo money. So yea GoTG made bank, cocane was had, sperg lords sperged and LLR needs to fix the fucking ignore function on this forum it blows donkey balls.

Its like people couldn't figure out why these streaming services never made money while Netflix dumps 30 bill a year into its own content. This is how it works. You can sell it to yourself or sell it to Netflix or whoever else but either way the film generates $$$
 
Last edited:

Sylas

<Gold Donor>
4,635
6,489
Man that's a whole lot of words for "jew math"
When a simple "Sylas, you were right and I was wrong" would of worked.

Movie division lost money.
Streaming lost even more money.
Let's move revenue from streaming to movie division so it looks like only streaming lost money.

Ok but that means we can't claim any of that revenue for streaming otherwise we would be double dipping and committing fraud?

Nah fuck it, double dip away faggots like juvarisx will totally come white knight for us on the internet
 

Gutterflesh

Parody Account
<Gold Donor>
9,699
52,693
I don't even know WTF is going on in this thread anymore, but context is for faggots.

I prefer my takes to be hot.

1752865222538.png
 
  • 2Worf
Reactions: 1 users