I have the 50 inch with out the gay 3D shit I would absolutely never use. I watch football and pretty much any kind of tv show. Never had a burn in issue. The tv even has a white wash function for IR. Many dumb people mistake IR for burn in also.
I found the official xmbc remote app to be terrible - have you checked out yatse ? I liked that one a lot better.It is a google nexus tablet running some apps to control stuff. One is called Touchsquid and that controls lighting and the receiver, another is the official xbmc remote,
Constellation looks awesome, but I couldn't find it for Android. I took a look at Yatse but it was about a year ago I was putting the control scheme together and I think Yatse has come a long way since then. If I really cared to get hardcore into the control stuff I would pay the money and go with IRule, it is the most comprehensive controller app, but I think it also costs $100 or more.I liked Constellation the most, it might be iOS only though.
I have a 50 inch panasonic plasma and a 49inch lg LED and everyone says the LED looks better. Got the LED last year and the plasma about 3 years ago.I'll just say that I've had a 42" Panasonic plasma for about 6 years. Played countless games on it, including stuff like Madden with stationary imagery, and never had any burn in at all. Recently upgraded to a 60" Panasonic plasma, could never go with LCD/LED. The image quality is just better, the motion is better, everything is better. Obviously there's no way to know for sure but I'd be willing to bet that 90%+ of the complaints you see on forums about plasma burn in are from people that don't actually own a plasma and are just trying to create drama because they bought an LCD/LED and want the world to agree that they made the right choice.
I never said there was a conspiracy. There are advantages to LCD/LED (power usage, size, weight, glare etc) but the image burn in is a highly propagated myth.Yeah totally, LCD/LED owners are part of a big conspiracy to put down plasma screens ....
In my experience thepublicgenerally regards brighter, more saturated TV's to be "better." It's only when you start talking to A/V nerds on forums that you get into black level debates and how to enter your TV's service mode to tweak color settings like the pros.I have a 50 inch panasonic plasma and a 49inch lg LED and everyone says the LED looks better. Got the LED last year and the plasma about 3 years ago.
Sadly true, that's why retail TV are all set to Torch Mode and the primary reason why LCDs sell more. Your average consumer wouldn't know color accuracy and quality if it bit them in the ass.In my experience thepublicgenerally regards brighter, more saturated TV's to be "better." It's only when you start talking to A/V nerds on forums that you get into black level debates and how to enter your TV's service mode to tweak color settings like the pros.
I'm not sure what you are talking about here, Plasmas have always had better viewing angles than their counterparts.The thing that bothers me most about plasmas is the double image you can get when looking at an angle because of the glass. Don't know if new sets alleviate that.
Yeah, that's nonsense and totally unnecessary. Running slides for 100 hours doesn't have anything to do with burn in. Those slides are used to "age" the TV a specific amount to use pre-made Calibration settings in the hopes of getting a similar result. It does not break-in the TV, prevent burn-in (which has long been a non-issue), or anything else. They are purely to try to get a similar calibration result without having to spend 250-350 dollars on a professional calibrator.The average consumer reads about 100 hour initial burn in slides also and cringes. Ain't nobody got time for that.