He* destroyed the exact same day he* met with investigators and 2 months after they first asked him* to turn over the information.They are saying Brady* testified during his appeal that he* had his* assistant destroy his* cell phone in March. Brady* testified he* has always done that when he* gets a new cellphone.
I've done that before but I also wasn't under investigation and I also didn't destroy the old one. I can understand wanting to destroy his old phones but doing it right then and there does seem suspect and that should of been clear to him.And who the fuck moves on from a cell phone after 4 months? If he has a history of doing it, fine. Precedence, even if he knew that they were looking for stuff off that phone. But if he normally keeps it for a year or so before upgrading to the new hotness, then that's some shady shit.
It's in the official report, bottom of page 3 and top of page 4. Unlike the Boston Homers who pretend to be experts, I've actually read the full Wells Report and the NFL appeal decision.I hadn't seen that he destroyed it the same day he met with investigators. Where was that posted? I saw he had destroyed it and the NFL didn't know about that until June or something like that.
He has an assistant? What a faggot.They are saying Brady testified during his appeal that he had his assistant destroy his cell phone in March. Brady testified he has always done that when he gets a new cellphone.
So you're an expert is what you're saying.Unlike the Boston Homers who pretend to be experts, I've actually read the full Wells Report and the NFL appeal decision
Nah you just read the document (or claims to), unlike you Boston asshats.So you're an expert is what you're saying.
And that is where Tom will lose his appeal, if he decides to fight this decision.If it goes to court they could subpoena the text records from his cell phone provider...