The Hobbit

Sulrn

Deuces
2,159
360
I didn't think the Witch King died to prophecy but to the ancient enchanted blades the hobbits found in the barrows way back in FotR that were specifically crafted bane weapons during the first rise of the Witch King. Also, Gandalf/Elrond/Galdriel mentions that the ring wraiths have been defeated numerous times "but one cannot truly destroy their evil" and they reform after time due to Sauron still being around.
 

chaos

Buzzfeed Editor
17,324
4,839
My understanding was that so long as their rings and the one ring exist, they exist in some form. The blade that actually "killed" the witch-king was whatshername's though Pippin crippled him with the leg blow from the barrow blade.

This stuff is all kind of iffy because half of it isn't very well explained, and probably on purpose. Nazgul are way cooler the more mysterious they are.
 

j00t

Silver Baronet of the Realm
7,380
7,473
It is specifically mentioned that the only way to kill the witch king is through the fulfillment of a specific prophecy. I take that to mean that the other ring wraiths are killable without any overly specific means. Though maybe that means that they are killable the same way sauron was, in that in time they would simply reform.

Also, I don't think the balrog and smaug are as equal as people were saying. Balrogs were maiar, but they were weaker, almost feral creatures. They always came across to me as tactically minded trolls. Smart enough to lead an army but at the end of the day they were killable by the opposing army. Though smaug was pretty weak compared to the other known drsgons so maybe they were equal.. I still think smaug would win but who knows
 

Chris

Potato del Grande
18,320
-264
Maiar Beast vs non Maiar Beast? The Balrog would garb hold of Smaug and beat it to death.

Gandalf sacrified himself to kill the Balrog because it COULDN'T be allowed to possibly ally with Sauron, although he wanted Smaug gone he didn't go all out and wasn't even there then he died.
 

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Correspondent / Stock Pals CEO
<Gaming Ghost>
75,741
150,345
My entire knowledge of LOTR/Hobbit stems from watching the 5 movies. But it definitely seems like the Balrog in the movies is much more badass than Smaug in FOTR. He is like 10 stories tall and is a supernatural demon while Smaug is just a very strong and tough lizard.
 

Cad

<Bronze Donator>
24,494
45,426
The Balrog is a Maiar, the dragons are mortal-ish beasts. Maiar aren't really "killable" in the traditional sense. I think the dragon is more destructive but I don't think he'd really be able to hurt the Balrog.
 

Quaid

Trump's Staff
11,554
7,862
Balrogs have duelled and defeated the Kings of the Noldor. Smaug would drop like a punk.
 

Asmadai

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
3,032
8,560
Dagor-nuin-Giliath, an army of 90,000 Orcs and Balrogs took on about 15,000 Elves and were like, completely wiped out. Hell, Feanor took on multiple balrogs all by himself and though he eventually died from his wounds (and from a beating from Gothmog), he still managed to kill his fair share. Even Gothmog, Lord of the Balrogs couldn't take down Fingon (who was the younger half-brother of Feanor) by himself without another balrog sneaking up behind him and giving him the edge.

Not to take away from the strength of balrogs or anything, but those elves in the earlier days of Middle-earth weren't nothin' to fuck with.
 

Big Phoenix

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Gold Donor>
44,778
93,616
LoTR lore sounds an awful like comics books. Strong/powerful as the situation calls for.
 

Asmadai

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
3,032
8,560
Nah, to be honest it's rather consistent when you know the lore. The Elves of the Third Age are no where near as powerful as the ones from the First, and for good reason. Tolkien really wasn't one to inflate/deflate power levels of characters for the sake of story. At least, nothing I can directly recall.
 

Cad

<Bronze Donator>
24,494
45,426
Nah, to be honest it's rather consistent when you know the lore. The Elves of the Third Age are no where near as powerful as the ones from the First, and for good reason. Tolkien really wasn't one to inflate/deflate power levels of characters for the sake of story. At least, nothing I can directly recall.
How is that possible when many of the elves from the first age are still alive in the third, and don't appear particularly distinctive from the rest? A lot of the "elf magic" is referred to but never really observed or described. Galadriel is probably the most powerful elf in the series, wouldn't you say? Is she also the oldest?
 

McCheese

SW: Sean, CW: Crone, GW: Wizardhawk
6,893
4,274
I don't know for sure, but I vaguely recall stuff about elves "diminishing" in the 3rd age.
 

Chukzombi

Millie's Staff Member
71,778
213,114
in the films elves seem to diminish as a choice or rather galadriel chose to diminish when she refused Sauron's ring.
 

Quaid

Trump's Staff
11,554
7,862
Galadriel chooses to 'diminish' when she rejects Frodo's offer of The One Ring. In doing so, she allows The One to be destroyed, which will also destroy the ring of power she wields (Nenya), which provides her with much of her strength.

Or so I always interpreted it.
 

Chukzombi

Millie's Staff Member
71,778
213,114
yeah, all the rings of power serve sauron.
"Three Rings for the Elven-kings under the sky,
Seven for the Dwarf-lords in their halls of stone,
Nine for Mortal Men doomed to die,
One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne
In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.
One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them,
One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them
In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie."
-J.R.R. Tolkien's epigraph to The Lord of The Rings
 

Sumdain x

Trakanon Raider
1,549
483
the 3 rings that elrond, galadrial and gandalf have are not under the one rings control, When melkor/morgoth assisted celebrimbor with crafting the rings the 3 rings (narya, ninya, and vinya) were made separately without any corruption.