Well, that article seems to be endorsing this view...
This seems like a really shitty way to want cheating accusations to be handled. It is essentially a "wink and a nod" when you find anything out and encourages teams to break the rules as much as possible.
So you think it's a better idea to let a team cheat in an AFC Championship game and then wait a half and say "AHA WE GOT YOU!"
I certainly think that is better than saying "well, we were told you were cheating, so stop it for now wink wink" and ignore it. A better option would have been to check the balls much sooner, I agree.
You can add this win to all your other bets you've won against this community, oh wait.
I like how he talks about integrity of the game, he looked like he had been on a 2 week meth binge when he got arrested. What a faggot!
Buddy called me and asked me if I was watching the game, my response was "what game" and he mentioned the pro bowl and I told him "no one gives a shit about that game unless a player on their team gets hurt".
If I came to your house, I would be in my underwear and asleep in 15 minutes soaking whatever I fell asleep on in sweat. How old are you anyway, cause my 100 year old grandfather doesn't even keep his house that hot. I have trouble breathing when I first walk into his house.
Don't be a dumbass. There's a world of difference between outside temperatures and inside temperatures.
You ever play any sort of organized football on any level at all?
Dangit, I meant to watch it. The way the teams shook out, it'll be pretty embarrassing if TeamCowboysIrvin didn't win.
