Translation, "Not even I think the deflated balls matter that much, so let's just ignore the context, paint all cheating the same and focus on a dubious set of evidence that implicates a team I don't like as cheating".
Not at 79 degrees fuck face, go put your sunscreen we wouldnt want you bursting into flames when the temp gets in the mid 70's!
Not even close. I understand you are a busy man and can't read the entire thread. I have already said we don't know what difference the balls made and can never know. No one with any sense or integrity at all can say with certainty that the cheater balls made no difference. They also can't say with certainty that they did. The best we can do is look at brady's and luck's completion percentages. Throughout the season, they were about equal. On that day, Brady's was the same as it had been all season, while Luck's was half his norm.
This just proves you still don't understand. You don't even realize heaters inside buildings are not giant balls of radiation. Does your house even have a heater?
Now your arguments in the political thread make a whole lot more sense.
Merrith did a good enough job explaining it. I'll take my Chicago schooling over your Texas style lack of analytical reasoning or critical thinking skills any day of the week.
I didn't have the gumption to find anything beyond the season completion percentages because the question wasn't important enough to spend any more time. I don't know what world you live in where 62% and 64% are not 'about equal'. I notice you don't mention that in that game Luck was in the 30s. When you take that into account, you see why I said I said 64 and 62 were 'about equal'. Pick nits much? I guess if you really still want to explore the asinine question of how much impact the cheaterballs had, what we need now is completion percentages for both QBs in wet and cold weather.
Why is that a bad question? That video claimed the balls should have dropped at least 1.6 PSI. The acceptable range is only 1 PSI. Therefore, the colts balls would have had to be illegal either before the game or at halftime. Only one thing can explain why only one set of balls was illegal at any point, and that's ball tampering. Whether the pats deflated, or the colts pumped theirs up after the initial tests. Hell, even if the pats heated their balls up so they would pass pre-game inspection, that would be ball tampering.
If the colt's inflated their balls outside, that could explain a lot. But, if the pressure loss was natural, (meaning not even a result of them heating the balls to trick the test), then there absolutely should not even be a fine. So I don't understand why you left that in as an option in that scenario.
Goddamn I still wish I had the Brady Train pic I had made for me a few years ago to post all over after the game.
How many times has Brady been in an important game in shitty conditions in his career? How many times has Luck? Pressure and all of that definitely never come in to play and affect someone. Not once in the history of sports. Everyone else already touched on how retarded your conclusions about completion %'s were and why it's retarded to compare stats for one game only (hey guess what, Brady has shit games too on the rare occasion). Also already been touched on how badly the Patriots have shit on Luck and his crew in their previous games.
