The Official Conspiracy Thread

H

hoganrulz

N00b
22
67
4h 24m
War on cash in coming boyos don't be slaves to "convenience" carry a wallet and stack it with cash, only bishes and babies use card. Real men whip out knots of cash from their sweaty socks and look at the hot cashiers like, yeah bih, you smell my manly expectorant
 
  • 1Like
  • 1Worf
Reactions: chthonic-anemos and TheBeagle
Blitz

Blitz

<Bronze Donator>
5,346
5,747
39d 1h 44m
Guurn said:
The problem with proving conspiracies is the assumed level of proof and the quality of the proof that is needed. If I say that white replacement is not only happening but it's proven. Now my jumping off point for proof might be.

And then I start showing the positions the people in the weather underground now hold. I'm thinking I've shown they believe something, and now they are trying to manifest those goals. The cynic will simply say that isn't proof and of course they are right. The real problem is defining what constitutes proof.

Before Trump's election let's say I argued that there is an elite group of pedophiles that are being controlled via blackmail and they are working towards normalizing their sexuality so they aren't being controlled any more. Here we are years later I'm taking to the same guy. I bring up Epstein and his two court cases, his isle, Maxwell, the fight logs, the renaming of pedophilia to minor attracted person's. Testimony from victims, most of which have mental issues for obvious reasons.



And then ask them if they now agree that it's a problem. Since I never asked what constitutes proof the out is it's just a few powerful men and women not some vast conspiracy. It's why this stuff falls.
Click to expand...
This is a good post.

2016 onward has helped move that "level of proof" needed, I believe, and that's good. People still have a ton of "Liberal priors" (not that all Liberalism as a philosophy is bad) though, and it's hard to shed those. I think people are starting to gravitate more and more to a revisionist view of history, though, because it's obvious to what degree this Global Elite class will go to obfuscate the truth. Now on the flip-side, just blatantly following revisionist views, because they're revisionist can be detrimental.

At minimum, I don't know how anyone can pay some level of attention to American culture and politics the last seven years and not strongly question our institutions.


Back to Sandy Hook... Was it a FEMA practice drill to ramp up gun control efforts? Was it a disaster, taken advantage of by the Feds? Sandy Hook is weird FoHbros. Why not release some footage of Lanza entering the area?
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: Del and chthonic-anemos
BunkyChutt

BunkyChutt

Poet Warrior
62
47
1d 4h 24m
My conspiracy theory threatens national security. Speaking clearly? You ass holes ain’t hearing me!
 
Rajaah

Rajaah

Paperhands McGee
<Gold Donor>
7,904
11,390
65d 21h 45m
Big Phoenix said:
9/11 was an inside job.
Click to expand...

Probably. Just happened to play into everything the US government was already planning to do, and they memory-holed Building 7 instead of explaining it. Start pulling that thread and the whole thing has a ton of question marks.
 
Guurn

Guurn

<Bronze Donator>
5,178
26,723
155d 7h 5m
May as well contribute to this again. Here's one that skirts that line. Easily believable but how do you prove it beyond a reasonable doubt.
1630091560983.png
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: chthonic-anemos
You must log in or register to reply here.