Players are meant to derive a perverse pleasure from desecrating the unsuspecting bodies of virtual female characters. It's a rush streaming from a carefully concocted mix of sexual arousal, connected to the act of controlling and punishing representations of female sexuality.If you've got a point to make, Doc, make it. You didn't actually contradict me there.
Players are meant to derive a perverse pleasure from desecrating the unsuspecting bodies of virtual female characters. It's a rush streaming from a carefully concocted mix of sexual arousal, connected to the act of controlling and punishing representations of female sexuality.Still waiting, Doc. Or was that your way of saying "No, Tanoomba, I have no point to make"?
Well, you "answered" it I guess, in the strict sense of answer. It just doesn't make sense or hold up.But that question has been answered in my above post anyway.
She was absolutely discussing Hitman in the context of her overall point about tropes. One does not preclude the other.Erronius: "Are you actually trying to trollbait me here, after I went out of my way to give you more leeway than anyone has probably given you in months?"
Trollbait? No, sir. I am directly addressing the, frankly, somewhat silly notion that using X as an example of Y = talking "about X".
Heck, you didn't even answer the question. It wasn't a trick question. You have nothing to fear.
You know what he reminds me of, actually?Also Moonbat is reminding me of Norman Bates and Anita is his mother.
If it is so "silly", why is it that every new person to this discussion (Chaos, Erronius, Quaid, myself, Angry Gerbil) immediately think she was?I am directly addressing the, frankly, somewhat silly notion that using X as an example of Y = talking "about X".
You might call it a perverse pleasureYou guys sure love arguing with Tanoomba.