The Tanoubliette: Pussy Hurt and Delusions or TTPHAD for short.
- Thread starter hodj
- Start date
- Status
Tanoomba
ジョーディーすれいやー
- 10,170
- 1,439
WHY THE FUCK would Khalid get a vote on whether Khalid's decision should be overturned?
Are you guys for real here?
Agree 100%. Too bad there are other posters whose actions that describes far better than my own.
Mario for onlymod 2017.I put the smilie in and have cleaned quite a few threads(after fucking it up the first time) including over a 100 in the movie house earlier today.
Cad has made smilies and cleaned zero threads
DickTrickle
Definitely NOT Furor Planedefiler
- 13,760
- 16,122
Cad
scientia potentia est
- 26,991
- 56,405
There's 5 of us, so as soon as 2 vote along with the original (who we would assume would vote to uphold his own action) thats a majority 3, 2 can't overturn 3...
Simple math is hard yo
Even if khalid abstained and the other 2 voted to overturn (they didn't, but lets say they did) then it'd be 2 to 2 and no action would be taken, RRP would stand.
Either way same result
Simple math is hard yo
Even if khalid abstained and the other 2 voted to overturn (they didn't, but lets say they did) then it'd be 2 to 2 and no action would be taken, RRP would stand.
Either way same result
DickTrickle
Definitely NOT Furor Planedefiler
- 13,760
- 16,122
There are very easily scenarios where it would matter (IE, someone abstains, the vote is 2-1 in favor of overturning, but then the mod under appeal votes not to overturn). Really just makes sense that the person whose action is on appeal shouldn't have a vote -- regardless of how this one vote turned out.
Also, why aren't the votes public? That would be useful information come election time.
Also, why aren't the votes public? That would be useful information come election time.
Cad
scientia potentia est
- 26,991
- 56,405
But in this case the vote was 3-0, and until the vote is 3 nothing would happen... 2-1 nothing would happen. A majority of mods are needed to overturn. If 2 abstain from voting and the other votes are split nothing happens i.e. decision stands. So...
No
Tanoomba
and
DickTrickle
you are being stupid.
Every mod even the one who did the action votes.
Tanoomba I would have banned you weeks ago by the way so don't think I support you in any way. You are a drain on this board and instead of giving it at least one month of stability you decided to make a point.
You couldn't act like a decent human for one month, that is sad.
Tanoomba
and
DickTrickle
you are being stupid. Every mod even the one who did the action votes.
Tanoomba I would have banned you weeks ago by the way so don't think I support you in any way. You are a drain on this board and instead of giving it at least one month of stability you decided to make a point.
You couldn't act like a decent human for one month, that is sad.
- 1
- 1
And votes aren't public because people like you are pieces of shit
DickTrickle
and
Tanoomba
and would create some bullshit thread trying to trap every moderator in some scandal.
You specifically Dick need to lay off wanting new rules for at least a damn week. FFS you are the biggest rule nazi on this forum.
DickTrickle
and
Tanoomba
and would create some bullshit thread trying to trap every moderator in some scandal. You specifically Dick need to lay off wanting new rules for at least a damn week. FFS you are the biggest rule nazi on this forum.
- 1
Tanoomba
ジョーディーすれいやー
- 10,170
- 1,439
Look. 2 out of 4 mods voted not to overturn the decision. I agree that 2 votes "against" is stronger than 2 abstaining. If it was 2 votes "against" versus 2 votes "for" we'd have an issue, but that wasn't the case here.
But telling me it was a majority because of 3 votes is bullshit. The person whose decision is being questioned should OBVIOUSLY not have a say in whether that decision is overturned. 2 people, both of whom were direct participants in the discussion and in no way impartial, chose to uphold the decision. The other 2, for whatever personal reasons (probably to keep themselves from becoming targets), abstained.
You don't need 3 votes if even a single mod abstains (especially vocally, since then you're not just waiting on someone). Keep the mod whose decision is being questioned out of it. I can't believe you need me to explain this to you.
Tanoomba
ジョーディーすれいやー
- 10,170
- 1,439
The point needed to be made, dude. We need to get this shit out of the way.No
Every mod even the one who did the action votes.
Tanoomba I would have banned you weeks ago by the way so don't think I support you in any way. You are a drain on this board and instead of giving it at least one month of stability you decided to make a point.
You couldn't act like a decent human for one month, that is sad.
Besides, I'm back to acting like a "decent human being" now, right? Safe spaces are safe again, and now at least we know which new mods are power-tripping assholes.
DickTrickle
Definitely NOT Furor Planedefiler
- 13,760
- 16,122
DickTrickle
Definitely NOT Furor Planedefiler
- 13,760
- 16,122
But yeah, it totally makes sense that the one whose actions are being appealed gets to vote. When did this board turn into the nfl?
DickTrickle
Definitely NOT Furor Planedefiler
- 13,760
- 16,122
Seriously, though, @a_skeleton_03, why are you such a bipolar piece of shit? You were all about rules and clarification and about taking things seriously, but now that you've had your fill and some things didn't go your way, it's just all too much. Not surprising you were the first to abuse the thread ban functionality.
- 17,781
- 25,897
No you aren't back to acting like. You never have on this forum outside of your retro game threads to be "back" being human.
You didn't expose shit so stop pretending you were running a smoke test. You aren't that smart.
- 1
What "things" didn't go my way? The rickshaw? Big whoop. What else?
I am not a rule nazi but if you make a rule I expect it to be fully defined.
I haven't abused shit not to mention thread bans. I specifically used it to show people how it works and took a screenshot of it and posted it. Not exactly abuse.
Keep concern trolling.
Erronius
<WoW Guild Officer>
- 17,329
- 44,989
DickTrickle
Definitely NOT Furor Planedefiler
- 13,760
- 16,122
Tanoomba was thread banned from the rickshaw vote and the amod thread for some period of time, no? And your reasoning for the thread ban on the rickshaw vote was he shouldn't be able to vote on something that affected what he can do. And yet, amod can vote to approve their own actions. Brilliant!
- Status