This whole conversation started because of ZQ's Twitter. Are you just mindlessly arguing now?Zoe Quinn? I said "Gamergate".
You must spread more reputation around yadda yaddaLet me try to give an analogy here.
When told that you were indoctrinating your children with fairy tales, you reacted with anger and pointed out all the benefits they were supposedly getting from it. That was irrelevant to whether or not you were indoctrinating your kids with fairy tales. It was an attempt to sidetrack to the discussion.
The inclusion of the word "now" at the end of your post implies that he ever wasn't just mindlessly arguing for arguments' sake.This whole conversation started because of ZQ's Twitter. Are you just mindlessly arguing now?
I claimed, and I stand by the claim, that Gamergate is currently a bigger part of the public consciousness than Watergate, especially among young people and ESPECIALLY among gamers. I made this point to stress that the kids playing Paper Mario are not going to think "Watergate" when they see that joke, they're going to think "a '-gate' scandal joke", due in no small part to the recent popularity of Gamergate.This whole conversation started because of ZQ's Twitter. Are you just mindlessly arguing now?
I didn't move goal posts. That's the statement I originally made and I stuck to it. You trying to infer meaning that isn't there doesn't mean I moved goal posts.so you moved the goal posts.
anyway, its pretty moot, because its difficult to be familiar with gamergate without knowing the names attached.
i still think you're wrong, btw. my 13 year old niece is pretty tech savvy and spends a ton of time online, i'll ask her if she's ever heard of gamergate. her step brother is only around every other week, but he's even more of a nerd. will ask him too when i get a chance.
granted, its just two examples, but its certainly more concrete than anything you have offered up.
Maddeningly retarded.I claimed, and I stand by the claim, that Gamergate is currently a bigger part of the public consciousness than Watergate, especially among young people and ESPECIALLY among gamers. I made this point to stress that the kids playing Paper Mario are not going to think "Watergate" when they see that joke, they're going to think "a '-gate' scandal joke", due in no small part to the recent popularity of Gamergate.
You claiming "but kids don't know who Zoe Quinn is!" doesn't change any of that.
Well, that is one interpretation. That your history class didn't talk about the Moon Landing, or Watergate, nor did your science class teach you elementary engineering.Canadians don't learn about Watergate in history class. Nor, I would imagine, do most people who don't live in America. We learn about it through hearing it referenced in popular culture.
And I stand by my statement that the -gate suffix has become its own thing and is very well known at this point. I still very, very much doubt the kids playing Paper Mario are going to read that joke and think "Richard Nixon".
Right. Let's set aside the various -gate scandals that are easily larger/better known than Gamergate (Deflategate, Spygate, CLimategate, Emailgate are all shoe-ins. And while some of the-gate stuffixesseem retarded, I would still place many of the events far ahead of Gamergame). The most likely situation is that kids (and most people) playing this game will read that joke and think "haha generic -gate scandal".And I stand by my statement that the -gate suffix has become its own thing and is very well known at this point. I still very, very much doubt the kids playing Paper Mario are going to read that joke and think "Richard Nixon".
Of course it wouldn't be justified. I've acknowledged as much.Right. Let's set aside the various -gate scandals that are easily larger/better known than Gamergate (Deflategate, Spygate, CLimategate, Emailgate are all shoe-ins. And while some of the-gate stuffixesseem retarded, I would still place many of the events far ahead of Gamergame). The most likely situation is that kids (and most people) playing this game will read that joke and think "haha generic -gate scandal".
So let's say someone threw an absolute shitfit that it was a Gamergate reference. Would that person's reaction be justified?
And here we are.