Untitled James Bond Film

Goatface

Ssraeszha Raider
11,935
24,017
Amazon should rebrand bond into the 00 universe. Give the dei their own 00 and let 007/bond be the white guy.

1771865339161.png
 
  • 2Worf
  • 1Like
Reactions: 2 users

gak

<Gold Donor>
2,704
13,965
When they play old Bond reruns we're shocked how good they were compared to the trash they shit out now. Our expectations have been zero for years, so the only entertainment we get is seeing the new lows they still manage to reach.

b.jpg
 
  • 3Like
Reactions: 2 users

Siliconemelons

Ssraeszha Raider
15,315
24,827
I am on Goldfinger, slowly watching them all in order. Will skip the 2 Dalton ones as I just watched those then decided to go back in order.
 

Haus

I am Big Balls!
<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
21,293
87,840
Now wait a minute. If they were to get Sydney Sweeney to be the new Bond, she and Moneypenny could spend an entire movie Goldfingering each other.
I actually heard last night they're starting "auditions" for the new Bond....

And I'm thinking why are they doing this in a world where Henry Cavill exists and is right there in the UK?

Cavill as Bond
Sydney Sweeny as Tits Galore (grand daughter of Pussy Galore) who turned coat and works for the CIA
Alexandra Daddario as the yet to be named Russian Counteragent.

Make that film... print money.
 
  • 2Solidarity
  • 1Like
Reactions: 2 users

Intrinsic

Person of Whiteness
<Gold Donor>
17,211
17,670
I actually heard last night they're starting "auditions" for the new Bond....

And I'm thinking why are they doing this in a world where Henry Cavill exists and is right there in the UK?

Cavill as Bond
Sydney Sweeny as Tits Galore (grand daughter of Pussy Galore) who turned coat and works for the CIA
Alexandra Daddario as the yet to be named Russian Counteragent.

Make that film... print money.


Plus, Cavill just started as an ambassador for Longines and would have to switch over to Omega I’m pretty sure.

Took a second to remember that Cavill was in Mission Impossible and not Bond.
 

reavor

I'm With HER ♀
<Bronze Donator>
6,225
22,524
When they play old Bond reruns we're shocked how good they were compared to the trash they shit out now. Our expectations have been zero for years, so the only entertainment we get is seeing the new lows they still manage to reach.

View attachment 620951

Kind of interesting to see the overall pussification of Bond over the decades:

Connery: straight to the point, sleek suave Bond, some puns and silliness but not too much.
Roger Moore: Campiest silliest Bond, every other line is some kind of pun. Still solid adventures.
Pierce Brosnan: Here Bond starts getting way more emotional about his missions, his women, etc. Much less silliness, but also less of a straight shooting spy, more bleeding heart. Now his boss is a woman.
Daniel Craig: Emotional slop Bond, trying to break even more with the old timey Bond. Way more about his history and childhood and all kinds of psychological BS not required for the adventure.
 
  • 3Like
Reactions: 2 users

Siliconemelons

Ssraeszha Raider
15,315
24,827
Kind of interesting to see the overall pussification of Bond over the decades:

Connery: straight to the point, sleek suave Bond, some puns and silliness but not too much.
Roger Moore: Campiest silliest Bond, every other line is some kind of pun. Still solid adventures.
Pierce Brosnan: Here Bond starts getting way more emotional about his missions, his women, etc. Much less silliness, but also less of a straight shooting spy, more bleeding heart. Now his boss is a woman.
Daniel Craig: Emotional slop Bond, trying to break even more with the old timey Bond. Way more about his history and childhood and all kinds of psychological BS not required for the adventure.

I watched all the bonds in order when they were on Netflix, got to Casino Royale before they yanked them.

Why are we omitting Timothy Dalton’s pair of films. They were quite darker than Moore or Connery - was nice to see Q in the field some.

The one George Lazenby one is odd because it’s out of order from the books is really telling. It does play through him getting married and her killed, its referenced nicely subtlety in the films after.

What is odd and interesting - is that all the “old” bonds up till goldeneye “look” like old films, then suddenly boom, it looks modern… i wonder what exactly it is.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Rabbit_Games

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
2,843
5,994
Pierce Brosnan was a great Bond. The scripts and fucking horrible CGI ruined it.
It should have been a smooth shift from Remmington Steele, but... Hollywood.

Connery has always been my favorite Bond. That bathtub scene where she's like, "Give me something to put on" and he hands her a pair of shoes. Legend.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

elidib

SamDaMan's Dungeon Club
3,118
6,800
if they're going for a "really different" take on the character, why even bother paying $8.5B and just make the movies about your character and start a new franchise like Bourne, Mission Impossible, Nikita, the Transporter, Atomic Blonde, Kingsman, etc.

It's so pointless paying a boatload of money for a property only to go and do something completely different than the property.
 
  • 3Like
Reactions: 2 users

Caeden

Golden Baronet of the Realm
8,578
14,271
Every time I see Amy pascal talking it’s like she forgot her lithium but remembered a bottle of wine.
 
  • 3Worf
Reactions: 2 users

Juvarisx

Florida
5,898
7,987
if they're going for a "really different" take on the character, why even bother paying $8.5B and just make the movies about your character and start a new franchise like Bourne, Mission Impossible, Nikita, the Transporter, Atomic Blonde, Kingsman, etc.

It's so pointless paying a boatload of money for a property only to go and do something completely different than the property.

This is why we shouldn't use Twitter as a news source


PASCAL: I would say the end of the year is a good bet. We are being really, really methodical. Having worked with Barbara Broccoli at the studio, I mean, Daniel Craig is a hard act to follow. And it’s got to be something really different that is a stirring and exciting and different

Different then Daniel Craig. Not a different character. We know they are going younger. DV is known for grounded, weighty action, and building tension. If they flat adapted the tone from the books it wouldn't surprise me at all. Thats very different.
 

MusicForFish

Ultra Maga Instinct
<Prior Amod>
47,593
191,062
This is why we shouldn't use Twitter as a news source




Different then Daniel Craig. Not a different character. We know they are going younger. DV is known for grounded, weighty action, and building tension. If they flat adapted the tone from the books it wouldn't surprise me at all. Thats very different.
1786369793681.png


1786369830035.png


1786369850437.png
 
  • 2Worf
  • 1Barf
  • 1Double Worf
Reactions: 3 users

Siliconemelons

Ssraeszha Raider
15,315
24,827
What would be amusing is a min-series lead up where its just a bunch of these "bonds" getting killed over and over then finally getting to the "real" new bond that leads into the movie.
 
  • 1Popcorn
  • 1Worf
Reactions: 1 users