Vanessa's Tranny AMA Blog Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

Lanx

<Prior Amod>
61,332
135,328
If this is what is deemed the best treatment for the child, puberty onset. This varies child to child obviously so you can't rationally put a hard number on that. My sister had full C cup boobs at 9 (so I heard).

this is a new numeric system

one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, puberty onset, ten, eleven, twelve...
 

Vanessa

Uncle Tanya
<Banned>
7,689
1,417
It's not too late to detransition bro. U still sound like a man, just gotta cut them fake melons out.
It's been noted you avoided my question.

I'm not triggered... more that it's really, really tiresome at this point to argue with a handful of willfully ignorant saps who want to deny the scientific facts about this entire argument.

They feel it's unethical. I have proven that the research, data, and science is indicating that kids are getting the right treatment, right help, and it's been a positive thing for these kid trannies AND THE DATA SUPPORTS THAT.
Because I don't make 30 posts an hour doesn't make me a "new person". Thank you, anyways for the welcome.
New to the convo, that wasn't a jab at your post count. Everyone in this debate was also in the SJW/GG thread. You weren't. Sorry if you misunderstood me :)

___________

Btw the funny thing is, is that all of you all bitch about the trannies competing in sports (I'm not a fan of the unfair advantage we have over women in physical sports either). If every tranny that was born with GD transitioned before they started a male puberty, the whole notion of trannies ruining women's sports would be complete and utter non-issue.

Now I'm not arguing that THIS is or should be the sole reason to continue to have puberty blockers being used... just... y'know... food for thought on that topic too.
 
  • 1Cringe
  • 1Worf
Reactions: 1 users

AngryGerbil

Poet Warrior
<Donor>
17,781
25,896
Are we to assume that for every tranny-kid of the sort that Charlize Theron has, that there was an equivalent sort of kid in the past that was neglected by his or her bigoted parents?

Theron is rewarding her child for that behavior and the child... being a child.... reacts to these incentives.

You are allowed to talk about the proper rearing of children just as soon as you have one of your own.

And go.
 
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 1 user

The_Black_Log Foler

Stock Pals Senior Vice President
<Gold Donor>
44,815
42,352
It's been noted you avoided my question.

I'm not triggered... more that it's really, really tiresome at this point to argue with a handful of willfully ignorant saps who want to deny the scientific facts about this entire argument.

They feel it's unethical. I have proven that the research, data, and science is indicating that kids are getting the right treatment, right help, and it's been a positive thing for these kid trannies AND THE DATA SUPPORTS THAT.

New to the convo, that wasn't a jab at your post count. Everyone in this debate was also in the SJW/GG thread. You weren't. Sorry if you misunderstood me :)

___________

Btw the funny thing is, is that all of you all bitch about the trannies competing in sports (I'm not a fan of the unfair advantage we have over women in physical sports either). If every tranny that was born with GD transitioned before they started a male puberty, the whole notion of trannies ruining women's sports would be complete and utter non-issue.

Now I'm not arguing that THIS is or should be the sole reason to continue to have puberty blockers being used... just... y'know... food for thought on that topic too.
Vanessa so mad because he wants kids to chock dick off and he wants to play sports with girlz so he can creepy in their locker room.

Disgusting
 
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 1 user

Vanessa

Uncle Tanya
<Banned>
7,689
1,417

Try to finish this article before you install a new sky light in the roof of your mouth.
What you want me to do and what I will do is, thank God, not compatible.

this is a new numeric system

one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, puberty onset, ten, eleven, twelve...
I just explained you can't put a hard number on when puberty starts. I was simply stating that my sister started puberty as early as 8 or 9. Again, this is up to the parents and doctors, not me, you, or anyone else.
 
  • 1Cringe
Reactions: 1 user

The_Black_Log Foler

Stock Pals Senior Vice President
<Gold Donor>
44,815
42,352
Even poppa Trump agrees

jukka23i_10flfv8_1ciwa3i.png
 
  • 7Worf
Reactions: 6 users

BoozeCube

Von Clippowicz
<Prior Amod>
48,553
285,529
You know Vanessa I would say you know deep down trans is bullshit because even with all the bullshit you are using to try and justify it, you can’t even bring yourself to Wu-tang off your twig and berries.

It’s just attention seeking.
 
  • 1Solidarity
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 users

AngryGerbil

Poet Warrior
<Donor>
17,781
25,896
Again, this is up to the parents and doctors

How many pedophile parents and doctors does it take to make kid-fucking 'true'?

A real doctor, with real ethics, will tell you that it is called the practice of medicine. A doctor that prescribes by authority alone is no doctor at all.

Indoctrinated parents are part of the problem. Are you anti-vaxx as well? What if I found 100 anti-vaxx doctors and 100 anti-vaxx parents? Are they sudden;y 'correct' or 'true'? Is science done by vote? You are appealing to authority and treating science like a religion. Stop it.
 

Il_Duce Lightning Lord Rule

Lightning Fast
<Charitable Administrator>
10,603
54,781
I don't hate you, but yes I very very much took it that I was being silenced in that thread by you and it pissed me off. I'd love to know what pussies complained about me. Fact is, deep down these clowns know I'm right and what they don't like is anything going against their narrative. Very SJW of them! It's all kinds here. There are some true bigots on this forum. That I can handle. You're a mod... you can 100% back me when I say that I have never ONCE reported ANY post directed to me about ANYTHING... even when Zyyz broke the forum rule of telling a member to kill themselves (twice I might I add). It's not personal attacks that piss me off... it's even the mere HINT of my voice being silenced. We ALL have maybe felt that on other forums or platforms, especially leftist leaning places. I think you can understand.

You're a good mod. But I'm done with that thread based on your post.

That's up to you. If you change your mind and can simultaneously avoid derailing the Gamergate thread with more of what you were doing previously you're free to post there.
 
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 1 user

Vanessa

Uncle Tanya
<Banned>
7,689
1,417
What sort of scientific paper would satisfy your desires?

If an adult wants to play games with their hormones...fine. I'm a libertarian. I might advise against it but if you're an adult then it's up to you.

Giving hormones to pre-pubescent children? I don't care what some sociological subjective interviews of kids says. That is not a reliable metric and is absolutely not scientific. The one 'tranny kid' I met was absolutely being manipulated by his mother. You can not convince me that that kid had agency in that situation. The mother, and all the SJW doctors, all agreed that the kid had more empirical knowledge of the world than they did.

I've noticed you've used the term 'true tanny kids' a few times. By what metric is the word 'true' measured in this regard?

Related: Should children like Hogg decide our gun laws? If you can't see that David Hogg and the Jesus-Camp kids are manipulated little babies, then how can you possibly tell me that children understand their own sexuality to such a degree that they are 'true' and we should listen to them?

I feel like the answer to a trans kid is to tell them to grow up, get through puberty, become an adult, and then decide what they want to do. Otherwise, I can't see by what mechanism a person (let alone a child) can be said to be 'true trans'.

I could imagine and summon 100 trannies of various possible configurations and I don't think you could use an objective standard to draw the lines between 'true' and 'false' in that population. I think it is a massive grey area and you assume the existence of 'true tranny' as opposed to 'mentally ill tranny' far too easily.

Don't link me 100 fucking links. That's really not a good way to argue. Read the links and summarize them here. If you are incapable of doing that (not just you but anyone using this tactic) then I have to assume you are merely linking to favorable propaganda and not to things that you actually know.

No True Tranny.
True tranny kids are kids who will not simply "grow out" of their issues via puberty. They will have GD their entire lives. Obviously I'm not going to go through what GD is for the millionth time... I think you, Gerbil, will certainly argue your stance that, like the others are taking here, puberty blockers and HRT on kids under the age of 18 is unethical, but I don't think you're ignorant enough to not understand that GD is a real thing.

The answer you adopt is what the others are adopting too. Let the 20% suffer and go through a puberty that they DON'T want to go through and damage them psychologically in the process. This is exactly what I don't want, no more than I want the 80% to undergo puberty blockers and HRT themselves. I want, and I'll bold/underline it to be clear as glass for the like 20th time: I want the right kids to get the right treatment. Period. End of story.

I agree it's a grey area. You're not wrong about that, especially since ROGD is a proven thing in science now too, and especially since SJW/leftist ideals such as non-binary shit has also hijacked what I call "true trannies". I assure you, you have SJW/leftists who will argue till their blue in the face that you don't have to have GD to be a tranny. This is horseshit.

I already summarized all the papers I "fucking linked". It's not my fault you missed or ignored them... one time in the GG/SJW thread and one time here. It's been a TON of action in this thread tonight so it's many pages back now.

Oh and how do you properly diagnose true GD suffering trans kids? Someone already asked that a page or two ago. I said that's info that, because I'm not an endo or specialist myself, I can't accurately give a proper answer to but from the papers I've read it indicates they are successfully separating the true trannies from the kids with other issues (i.e. the 80%).
 
  • 1Cringe
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 users

TrollfaceDeux

Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
<Bronze Donator>
19,577
3,743
True tranny kid in it of itself is an abstract concepts.

Male and female are the only existing gender that matters.

Source: biology
 
  • 1Solidarity
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 users

Vanessa

Uncle Tanya
<Banned>
7,689
1,417
That's up to you. If you change your mind and can simultaneously avoid derailing the Gamergate thread with more of what you were doing previously you're free to post there.
This place works for me too. As I've stated I really don't care about the "where", I just care if it ruffled feathers to the point I was going to be Tanoomba'd (read: banned).

Thank you LLR. I'm sorry for my initial post being snappy; again I felt I was being silenced and censored. That is what WILL piss me off more than any insult anyone can dream up here about me, heh.
 
  • 1Cringe
Reactions: 1 user

AngryGerbil

Poet Warrior
<Donor>
17,781
25,896
True tranny kids are kids who will not simply "grow out" of their issues via puberty. They will have GD their entire lives. Obviously I'm not going to go through what GD is for the millionth time... I think you, Gerbil, will certainly argue your stance that, like the others are taking here, puberty blockers and HRT on kids under the age of 18 is unethical, but I don't think you're ignorant enough to not understand that GD is a real thing.

The answer you adopt is what the others are adopting too. Let the 20% suffer and go through a puberty that they DON'T want to go through and damage them psychologically in the process. This is exactly what I don't want, no more than I want the 80% to undergo puberty blockers and HRT themselves. I want, and I'll bold/underline it to be clear as glass for the like 20th time: I want the right kids to get the right treatment. Period. End of story.

I agree it's a grey area. You're not wrong about that, especially since ROGD is a proven thing in science now too, and especially since SJW/leftist ideals such as non-binary shit has also hijacked what I call "true trannies". I assure you, you have SJW/leftists who will argue till their blue in the face that you don't have to have GD to be a tranny. This is horseshit.

I already summarized all the papers I "fucking linked". It's not my fault you missed or ignored them... one time in the GG/SJW thread and one time here. It's been a TON of action in this thread tonight so it's many pages back now.

Oh and how do you properly diagnose true GD suffering trans kids? Someone already asked that a page or two ago. I said that's info that, because I'm not an endo or specialist myself, I can't accurately give a proper answer to but from the papers I've read it indicates they are successfully separating the true trannies from the kids with other issues (i.e. the 80%).

Don't tell me 'the papers indicate it'. Don't tell me 'other issues'.

Vanessa, you either know the answers to these things or you don't.

So is a 'true' trans kid defined by endocrinology or sociology or psychology?

The elasticity of your definitions is allowing you a feral romp.
 
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 1 user

Vanessa

Uncle Tanya
<Banned>
7,689
1,417
True tranny kid in it of itself is an abstract concepts.

Only thing real is male and female.



This is the vid I said that y'all should focus on instead of the actual article that Aaron linked in the GG thread. I've posted it to where it plays at the spot I'd at least like you to hear.

This is an MD that is arguing what you guys are arguing... that it's unethical to have kids on blockers or HRT.

I've only gotten to the 20 minute mark (I've been arguing with you guys since I've been home!), but even a doctor that takes y'alls stance knows that GD is real and states as such.

You all really need to at the very least get past this point of GD being fake. Again, it's unscientific to think otherwise.
 
  • 1Cringe
Reactions: 1 user

pysek

It Didn't Happen, It Should've, and It Will.
<Gold Donor>
18,308
112,026
True tranny kids are kids who will not simply "grow out" of their issues via puberty. They will have GD their entire lives. Obviously I'm not going to go through what GD is for the millionth time... I think you, Gerbil, will certainly argue your stance that, like the others are taking here, puberty blockers and HRT on kids under the age of 18 is unethical, but I don't think you're ignorant enough to not understand that GD is a real thing.

The answer you adopt is what the others are adopting too. Let the 20% suffer and go through a puberty that they DON'T want to go through and damage them psychologically in the process. This is exactly what I don't want, no more than I want the 80% to undergo puberty blockers and HRT themselves. I want, and I'll bold/underline it to be clear as glass for the like 20th time: I want the right kids to get the right treatment. Period. End of story.

I agree it's a grey area. You're not wrong about that, especially since ROGD is a proven thing in science now too, and especially since SJW/leftist ideals such as non-binary shit has also hijacked what I call "true trannies". I assure you, you have SJW/leftists who will argue till their blue in the face that you don't have to have GD to be a tranny. This is horseshit.

I already summarized all the papers I "fucking linked". It's not my fault you missed or ignored them... one time in the GG/SJW thread and one time here. It's been a TON of action in this thread tonight so it's many pages back now.

Oh and how do you properly diagnose true GD suffering trans kids? Someone already asked that a page or two ago. I said that's info that, because I'm not an endo or specialist myself, I can't accurately give a proper answer to but from the papers I've read it indicates they are successfully separating the true trannies from the kids with other issues (i.e. the 80%).

Not to intrude, and for the sake of argument granting everything you say, my question is this: Given that a 100% accuracy rating, in terms of treatments going to the right person, is statistically impossible, meaning that some GD kids WILL go through puberty and some non GD kids WILL be most certainly given permanently life-altering hormones, do you genuinely think it's worth those kids being permanently fucked so someone else's mental illness ( which I believe you've granted your condition is) can be assuaged? I do not mean disrespect, I do not doubt your sincerity, but would that trade-off really be worth it to you?
 
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 1 user

Il_Duce Lightning Lord Rule

Lightning Fast
<Charitable Administrator>
10,603
54,781
This place works for me too. As I've stated I really don't care about the "where", I just care if it ruffled feathers to the point I was going to be Tanoomba'd (read: banned).

Thank you LLR. I'm sorry for my initial post being snappy; again I felt I was being silenced and censored. That is what WILL piss me off more than any insult anyone can dream up here about me, heh.

Good! Now that that's out of the way I'm getting into this debate, because potentially harming children triggers me badly.

How would you respond to this post I made in the GG thread the last time this issue came up?

Not to dive too much into this subject, but to me, the main concern regarding giving hormone blockers to children is not psychological, medical, or scientific: it is ethical.

No amount of studies can be produced to change the ethics of possibly harming ANY child by giving them hormone blockers. The hippocratic oath states: first do no harm. You instantly violate that by prioritizing a possible benefit over a certain harm. What's the certain harm? Whether the child is helped by alleviating GD or by ruining their life further, they will be rendered incapable of conceiving a child. There's another name for this: castration.

All of the rest of the talk about studies and psychology and what the "science" says is irrelevant to the ethics of the situation. That is very clear, and violating the ethics of this question is committing the crime of mutilating a child, which is one of the most heinous crimes you can commit.


So yes, if the price of having a few people slightly less satisfied in dealing with their mental issues as adults is that no children are harmed by a procedure that castrates them using hormone blockers, then that's a trade-off that is easy to make.

The thing about making a scientific argument is that AngryGerbil AngryGerbil is correct, you are inherently appealing to authority. Someone would be as logically sound by saying that the devil compels you to put kids on puberty blockers, since in both cases you are appealing to an outside authority that is perceived to be higher than yourself, whether it be the devil or science.

Also, ethics is not about feelings it is about philosophy, something science is not well equipped to handle. Put another way, science can possibly tell you what to do or what not to do, but it cannot tell you why or why not.
With this inherent limitation in mind, why would scientific possibility be the end-all be-all argument for putting children who's futures are anything but certain through a procedure that has the potential to permanently harm them if you imperfectly divine the outcome of at least 5 years in the future?
 
  • 1Solidarity
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 users

Vanessa

Uncle Tanya
<Banned>
7,689
1,417
Don't tell me 'the papers indicate it'. Don't tell me 'other issues'.

Vanessa, you either know the answers to these things or you don't.

So is a 'true' trans kid defined by endocrinology or sociology or psychology?

The elasticity of your definitions is allowing you a feral romp.
True trans kid suffering from GD as diagnosed by either a trained psychologist, doctor, or endocrinologist; a true tranny that will NOT "outgrow" GD just by going through puberty and in fact will have even more discomfort and distress by going through puberty.

I admit that accurately diagnosing them is something I'm not quite sure of the process either because, as is obvious, I'm not a doctor/endocrinologist myself (duh) so I can't tell specifically tell you their methods. I'd love to know though, sure... I love fact based info. I'm sure enough that in one paper they discussed that for adolescent kids with gender issues, they have a team of specialist assigned for them but I'd really have to dig that quote up again as I don't have it on me RIGHT this second, but it's in there somewhere.

If it seems my definitions are malleable, that's not how I'm intending them to be. At all. Ask me for a specific definition and will specifically, accurately, and scientifically define them for you.
Posting a video doesn't make you less insane.
Feels feels feels, no facts.
 
  • 1Cringe
  • 1Barf
Reactions: 1 users
Status
Not open for further replies.