Vanessa's Tranny AMA Blog Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
This guy needs help. Every post he makes here is a cry for help.
 
  • 1Tiresome
Reactions: 1 user

Vanessa

Uncle Tanya
<Banned>
7,689
1,417
There's only one person between the two of us coming into the other's thread after EVERY post the other makes literally in a span of minutes after it's made.

There is no hyperbole in my words when I say that this ENTIRE forum can see you're obsessed with me.

I think what you need to do is call me an attention whore for the 597th time while simultaneously having a link TO YOUR THREAD in your sig. That'll show people how rational and non-hypocritical you are.

ugh.gif
 
  • 1Cringe
Reactions: 1 user

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
You really do need help.

Also didn't read. Playing WoW classic, you know, mmos, the things this forum exists for, not for focusing on your lopsided fucked up ass fake tits and your insipid attempts to pretend you're a christfag and a tranny at the same time.
 
  • 1Tiresome
Reactions: 1 user

Punko

Macho Ma'am
<Rickshaw Potatoes>
7,923
12,572
That's just the first step; what they want is for me to be banned completely because, as I said dozens of pages ago, they are nothing but SJW's intent on silencing what they disagree with.

Everyone here disagrees with your stance on puberty blockers.

We've discussed this before, and I've previously pointed out that you can't seem to come to the insight that you are wrong, and its not just everyone else that is insane.

Understanding you have an issue is the first step in solving it, and you just don't seem to be able to grasp that you have serious issues.
 
  • 1Solidarity
  • 1Picard
Reactions: 1 users

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
If Vanessa Vanessa wasn't a lying, disingenuous, attention whoring piece of human garbage, he would admit that his thread got shawed because of himself and no one else.

But he can't do that because personal responsibility is not in his repertoire. So he must project and cast blame elsewhere.
 
  • 1Tiresome
Reactions: 1 user

Punko

Macho Ma'am
<Rickshaw Potatoes>
7,923
12,572
Vanessa Vanessa I don't think you can even reply to the post I made before this one, your thought process doesn't seem to allow considering that you might in fact be wrong.

Anyway; I wanted to repeat this post, because it reflects what most of the "neutral" posters here think.

Y'all killed your golden goose dumbasses.
View attachment 219550

Basically you are seen as a source of entertainment, not because of your witty statements, but because of your total disconnect from reality when it comes to certain topics, along with the hilariously stupid statements you keep making on them.
 
  • 1Mic Drop
  • 1Picard
Reactions: 1 users

chaos

Buzzfeed Editor
17,324
4,839
Nope. These were forum gifts, which is defaulted to send an e-mail alert unlike common notifications.

But you wouldn't know about such things because you're just a perpetual nobody around here who hasn't experienced that yet (and likely never will).


I knew you'd be the one to care (kinda) Erro!
Vanessa straight crushing my self esteem because no one of foh sends me gifts or ever will. Goddamn trannies are savage as fuck.
 
  • 3Worf
Reactions: 2 users

Punko

Macho Ma'am
<Rickshaw Potatoes>
7,923
12,572
Vanessa straight crushing my self esteem because no one of foh sends me gifts or ever will. Goddamn trannies are savage as fuck.

Not having this thread named after you seems a pretty big gift at this point.
 
  • 1Truth!
Reactions: 1 user

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
Vanessa straight crushing my self esteem because no one of foh sends me gifts or ever will. Goddamn trannies are savage as fuck.

Here bro. I have so many of those soybucks to spend, pick a joke title and Ill buy it for you
 

Punko

Macho Ma'am
<Rickshaw Potatoes>
7,923
12,572
Here bro. I have so many of those soybucks to spend, pick a joke title and Ill buy it for you

I tried to make his post orange, because he's obviously a bad man, it didn't work.

feelsbad.jpg
 
  • 1Thoughts & Prayers
Reactions: 1 user

Vanessa

Uncle Tanya
<Banned>
7,689
1,417
hodj hodj In the span of two days I had Vanessa losing his shit and quitting the forums AND inviting him back for more during the "is it OK to hit a woman" thread.
You flatter yourself a touch here Dom. ...and while I respect you as a good and rational poster, wanted to merely clarify.

I got dogpiled in that thread and it was the first time I ever encountered being dogpiled by the forum. After I came back for "quitting" for two weeks, I fully admitted I got owned, and badly in that very thread.

What I can give you credit for is being a part of the dogpile that argued against my stance. You argued your position well and that (amongst various other posts that I've read since I've known of your existence here) is why I respect you. But to claim it was YOU that made me quit the forum for two weeks and that YOU had any part in inviting me back to the forum for more lulz is a touch too much of a self-pat on the back imo.

Just get on with whatever it is you want to say.
Do you agree a child that is not normal should be taken to a doctor?

Yes <--

No <--

I'm honestly not trying to talk down to you Chaos... I have no problems with you personally, I'm trying to get you to see how badly I have been misunderstood, strawmanned, and shit upon by these psychos who are more SJW than they realize. Truly, if it's too much of a hassle to engage in this simple yes/no question/answer dialogue, then tap out and simply believe the propaganda pushed by the reactionary donks like Phazael, Boozecube, Punko and Zyyz who are incapable of grasping my stance and instead merely want to push this narrative: "Vanessa wants to harm other people's kids with puberty blockers" which is, quite simply, slander. That's your prerogative to believe what you want to believe.
 
  • 1Cringe
Reactions: 1 user

chaos

Buzzfeed Editor
17,324
4,839
Yes, provided they go to a Draegan approved, JunkiesNetwork affiliate doctor.
 
  • 1Worf
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 users

maskedmelon

Orator of Superfluous Nothings
1,893
2,952
witnessed a dogpile last year. a friend's pooch had pups and - omgosh they were so fruckin' cuuute- they'd all like worm around blindly, flopping over and under one another to get warm and comfy before falling back to sleep (what they did most). I tend to think the bottom is the best place to be in the dogpile. It is safest and warmest and maybe smelliest I guess on the downside, but it is best to get to know ALL th'other pups, ya know? the doggo at the top isn't always gonna be cold, but you can still help warm him up from below.

Also, wow is garbage for supreme homos -- NO OFFENSE --. changemymind. (^ν^)
 
  • 1Worf
Reactions: 1 user

Vanessa

Uncle Tanya
<Banned>
7,689
1,417
Yes, provided they go to a Draegan approved, JunkiesNetwork affiliate doctor.
LoL, so joking about Draegan aside, we've so far agreed that kids having or exhibiting some gender incongruent behavior aren't normal, and that abnormal kids should be taken to the doctor for help.

The doctor, if it's your family doctor/PCP will probably say something like, "Well, this is beyond my regular practice so your child needs a specialist to talk to. I know Dr. Yadda Yadda has a practice in -insert local city- that has dealt with gender issues in adolescents before. Here's a referral".

Do you take your child to the specialist practice at this point Chaos?

Yes <--

No <--
 
  • 1Cringe
  • 1Dislike
Reactions: 1 users

chaos

Buzzfeed Editor
17,324
4,839
"gender incongruent behavior" is a nebulous phrase that doesn't really hold meaning. But for the sake of moving this along,yes, you do.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Vanessa

Uncle Tanya
<Banned>
7,689
1,417
"gender incongruent behavior" is a nebulous phrase that doesn't really hold meaning. But for the sake of moving this along,yes, you do.
Okay well sorta like a Louder With Crowder segment I just want to stop so we can find common ground for that definition so that further along we don't get sidetracked by semantics on that definition.

I'd postulate that "gender incongruent behavior" from a child is indeed a large umbrella, but essentially encapsulates this:

Statements such as:
"I feel like a girl" (our hypothetical kid being a biological boy)
"I like these dresses"
"I want my hair long"
"I want my nails pretty like mommy's"

Or behaviors like:
-mingling with girls in social circles
-having a predilection with the color pink instead of blue
-playing with dolls instead of action figures
-gravitating toward femme objects and ideas vs. traditionally boyish objects and ideas.

Can we agree that what I laid out can be considered "gender incongruent behavior" ?
 
  • 1Cringe
  • 1Dislike
Reactions: 1 users
Status
Not open for further replies.