Vanessa's Tranny AMA Blog Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
No, really, I snort lines of cocaine the size of bannister rails and love the sound of my own voice and have never written a treatise that long.

I literally laid out every piece of evidence for Jesus in the atheism thread once, in a single post, and it wasn't half as long as that goddamn garbage.


You have to be shooting adderal or something to post shit like that.
 
  • 1Hodjing
Reactions: 1 user

Vanessa

Uncle Tanya
<Banned>
7,689
1,417
You can tell Vanessa Vanessa is a narcissist 1 because he's obsessed with self image (hence why he's a tranny) and 2 he really loves the sound of his own damn voice
No, really, I snort lines of cocaine the size of bannister rails and love the sound of my own voice
giphy (6).gif
 
  • 1Cringe
  • 1Worf
Reactions: 1 users

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
You're only serving to prove my point that your attention whoring is the worst and also that you get manic as fuck after eating a bunch of hormones and decide to write 60k word posts no one will read because you are an idiot with no real point to make

Brevity is the soul of wit, which is how we know you have none.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Erronius

Macho Ma'am
<Gold Donor>
16,478
42,409
No, really, I snort lines of cocaine the size of bannister rails and love the sound of my own voice and have never written a treatise that long.

I literally laid out every piece of evidence for Jesus in the atheism thread once, in a single post, and it wasn't half as long as that goddamn garbage.


You have to be shooting adderal or something to post shit like that.
To be fair, it easily takes less time to read that post than to watch one of your Youtube videos.
 
  • 2Like
  • 2Worf
  • 1Ice Burn
Reactions: 4 users

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
To be fair, it easily takes less time to read that post than to watch one of your Youtube videos.

I dont make those though. If I did theyd all be 10 minutes long to maximize view time to completion in order to maximize my own ad revenue
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

joz123

Potato del Grande
6,576
9,251
Well that whole "I'm gonna post four things tonight" plan that I hatched last night worked out terribly for me. Womp womp.


This aged about as well as a sunbathing smoker. See how that works, tardos? I admit fault and am very quotable when you actually have a real point and argument instead of just strawmanning me to death and/or not even knowing my position/stance yet failing to be able to quote something I have actually said that backs up your claim.

Anyway, I typed up most of it but my brother called and we talked for almost 2 hrs and then I just was too sleepy to care about FoH last night. ...and I worked a half day today so I'm just getting back to this juggernaut of a post.

Seen a few posts attributing the Straight Pride Parade to Milo. Just to be clear as glass, Milo is merely the highest profile person having interest in it and was designated Grand Marshall, but it's NOT Milo's stint. He's just a fabulous faggot that'll be there doing Milo-esque shit.

The organizer's have had their patreon and paypal accounts for donations closed down due to violating their TOS. The exact nature of what rules were broken are murky. Typical! This is what the left does. This is the very essence of the censorship that they espouse. It will get worse when it gets closer to go time.


Hello maskedmelon! Since this is the interbutts and everyone is who they say they are and how they represent themselves in their avatar and never lie, I'm going to have to ask Jasker to teach me to summon you into my bedroom.


Fantastic; let's keep talking.


You smoke pot don't you?


I do laugh at the beard thing and the cloud thing, but He IS light (but of course not literal light... He's not mere photons, but Christ Himself said He is light [John 1:5]). The fact of the matter is, the typical image of God that we humans have (as you said, believers and non-believers alike) have attributed to Him like this:

View attachment 218083
(God enjoys hiking apparently)

...is not what God really looks like, but there is a level of truth that He has SOME type of form like this, but we've sorta reverse engineered Him in our mind. Fact is, it's not that God looks like US, it's that WE look like God. Two passages come to mind:

1) We were made in His image (Genesis 1:27)
2) God's face was discussed a few times when Moses was walking upon the earth (Deuteronomy 34:10)

So God has a face. We have a face. Animals have faces. Virtually all intelligent life has faces constructed in the same manner affixed to a head; but... to the evolutionist/atheist, we evolved this way... All of us, everywhere. Yup. Totally not designed... totally just random mutations. Even Jasker with his odd beliefs of reality and origin has pointed out this interesting peculiarity.


Conflict is what being human and going through this life/reality is though. The purest conflicts are binary. Light vs Dark. Good vs Evil. Right vs Left. Trump vs TDS sufferers. Etc. Heaven will be the pinnacle of having no conflict though... where good and evil, through God's divine judgment, is separated. Hell will be eternal conflict, however, and where those who perpetuate hate, chaos, lies, evil, and all manner of sin here on earth will find eternal unrest.

If you find meaning, comfort and happiness characterizing God as mere Action, more power to you.


So since you're new and it's been a long time since I've mentioned any of this I suppose it bears saying again.

I do not reject evolution based solely upon my Christian beliefs... I reject it because it's simply not what I believe is the origin of life. Period. I think micro-evolution is 100% factual but I don't think that given enough time that simple organisms evolve into complex organisms.

Species / kinds / types ...however you want to label it, are all we have on this beautifully diverse and rich planet. I see unique and marvellous lifeforms littered among us, not a bevy of transitional amalgams inching closer to the next evolutionary plateau.

It's just a perfect coinkydink that macro evolution is bullshit and the bible fits into that narrative too.

If I was somehow shown beyond ANY DOUBT that God was a powerful hallucination and not real (not likely), I'd STILL say evolution is a bunch of peacock piss. ...and vice versa. If I was shown that the origins of life were exactly how Darwin hypothesized (not likely), I'd still believe in God. The two religions of Christian faith and Evolution don't cancel each other out. (...and yup, belief in evolution is a religion [i.e. a belief in something that cannot be proven via the scientific method], do NOT be fooled).


I agree 100% People think of the political spectrum as Right and Left and use the visualization just like sex/gender, like this:

View attachment 218086

I think sometimes, politically, the far right and the far left intersect their ideas and almost share the same extremism making the line into a circle/ring.

For example, how Antifa is so far left that they basically swing full-circle right into fascist ideology of silencing opinions and ideas, and how some alt-right go so far right that they push racism and ethnostates by ranking people based on skin color/intellect and putting them in classes, similar to far left communist ideas of the bourgeoisie (the haves) and proletariat (the have-nots) classes of people.

The extremes, sadly, are all rooted in hate.


Last I checked my middle school textbooks, this is what heterosexual sex looks like:

View attachment 218085

The above is what happens in my bedroom, not this:

View attachment 218084

My past is my past and I have repent the sins of said past. I move forward, today, straight and proud!

I need to work on that whole pre-marital sex thing though... it's a doozy of a sin, and my weakest fault as a human.


Freedom of Speech. Stop being an SJW that keeps trying to destroy other ideas that you don't agree with... gosh, what are you a stupid hypocrite or something???


Why? Because you don't like the direction it goes sometimes? I want to hear you out though; what do you suggest happen? Paint a picture for us in the universe where Bubbles is in charge and Vanessa's Tranny AMA Blog Thread V2.0 is just unveiled. What now?


Soygen, I figured you'd be a fan of this vid:



Their hypocrisy is unmatched, and I thank you for being another person besides myself to put a spotlight on that. Bravo ya Brit!


Wat? WAT?!?!? If you're talking about the God/Jesus stuff, the things I say aren't (technically) factually incorrect or correct... it's just faith based. If you're talking about the tranny shit or anything else, I challenge you to find and quote me ANYTHING I have said that is factually incorrect. Keep in mind, just because you and others don't LIKE the things I say, that doesn't make them untrue. This is the bulk of the problem with the retards of this thread: they literally shitcan scientific research papers just because they don't like the social / moral implications of it. THIS is why I call many of you (not YOU specifically iannis, but maybe...) SJWs. Y'all are acting just like the typical leftist SJW with a LOT of the tranny shit and y'all don't even realize it. Trust me I'm laughing about it RIGHT NOW and would be laughing at anyone that actually had the gumption to debate me on trans shit via a podcast.


I don't have kids, correct. The closest I had to kids was my nephews and they think I'm just dandy. I have never, nor would ever, try to push my trans shit on them... their father (my brother, who I'm VERY close to) would come on here and attest to this. Zyyz and Punko are either trolls to the hilt or their perception of me is so skewed that it's almost frightening.


Of course no actual harm is being done. All the top research points to these drugs being safe and effective. No one has posted anything counter to this other than SJW feels, frankly. Find the peer reviewed papers showing that these drugs are harmful and you'll have a point. This is the tally of how many people have done this in this thread:

0

That's a big fucking goose egg. None. Zilch. Nada. People have posted conservative-slanted news articles that speak against blockers, true. People have posted blog posts that talk against blockers, right again. People have posted YouTube vids from Christian-based agenda groups that are against it. People have posted independent practitioners with an opinion-based groundwork against it. But no one has dropped ONE shred of peer-reviewed research that this is harmful here or anywhere from any esteemed research group. I.E. the unbiased people doing the actual researching and testing has concluded they are safe and effective. <--- This is who I trust about trans shit. Doctors. Medical Professionals. You know... the people who actually STUDY this shit for a living. Go out and do your independent journalism yourselves. Interview the people at the gender clinics. Interview the Endocrinologists in your local community about all of this stuff. Do your research. Post your findings. BE MY GUEST. It'll be YOU guys who will look like the crazy nutters in cuffs when you walk out of these places to condemn puberty blockers, not me.


They're not 'fucking with kids', they're treating mentally ill adolescents with Gender Dysphoria and making them happier. It's not an if/when scenario Iannis... it's already being done across the world. That's what I've been saying... retards are demonizing me for literally just saying why this is being done and spinning this narrative into this faux outrage like I'm the one that advocated for this. I'm merely the one popping in explaining why this is happening... but for almost 100 pages ignorant SJW retards strawmanned their way to hysteria. I ask: Where are ALL the harmed children??? Where are all these stories of evil doctors putting normal healthy kids on puberty blockers? The answer is clear: Nowhere.


See now, THIS is where we would stand together. It's fucking evil.. EVIL to manipulate your child into a forced gender role or raise them as agender or whatever. Boys as boys and girls as girls is just fine. IF the parents are raising their child normally and the child starts to express an incongruence in their gender, try to steer them back to normalcy LoL. You WILL see a pattern of resistance with highly gender dysphoric children though. It is persistent and INsistent. THEY are the children who need to then be taken to see a specialist and only after it becomes a "problem". Doctors and shrinks are smart enough to weed out where the root of the gender shit is coming from though; the kid or the parent.


I see why you said that, trust me. Transition would have helped me, yes. Puberty blockers... maybe, but probably not. I didn't start puberty too young, and, had I and my parents known then what we know now, wouldn't have needed blockers to "give it more time". It'd just be a lateral transition to female at the onset of puberty, which would make puberty blockers moot. So no, puberty blockers wouldn't have benefitted me I don't think.

Here again, as I've said for the billionth time, puberty blockers are just one method to help treat a rare condition of mental illness found in adolescents. I don't disavow puberty blockers if THAT is what helps someone out there for the exact same reason that I don't disavow gun ownership or want to block the 2nd amendment just because I myself don't own a gun.
Stop being virtue signaling SJWs about all of this. Thanks.

Love,
Vanessa
 
  • 2Like
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 2 users

Lithose

Buzzfeed Editor
25,946
113,035
But yeah, I already admitted, a few years ago I would have told you that you were a retard if you said that this puberty blocker thing would even be an actual argument. And it still isn't mainstream, most people don't know wtf it even is, but it's way more mainstream than it should be. And then there's cases like the Adam Hates Everything guy on Rogan, where he clearly seems to want to be empathetic to trans people, but the path he takes is to just abandon any critical thinking at all on the subject. It's a problem that neither political extreme really has an answer for. The answer certainly isn't id politics focused trollfests.

Some of us were telling you years ago about the stuff that you now kind of admit maybe has gone too far. We were told IOOTI.

Now people are warning you that those things ALSO have a radical element that has become fairly aggressive against anything considered to be "normal". And that this radical element, if not confronted, will grow into the same kind of real institutional change that puberty blockers and Orwellian language control have grown into, because its already affecting culture in major ways. And once more, we get IOOTI. No one is saying the Anti-Straight stuff is mainstream yet. We're just looking in the same places where the deluge of this nihilistic, PC nonsense has been coming from and seeing the next wave, we're watching as the people confronting it are being fired and de-platformed, illustrating the power behind the movement. We're watching as cultural centers get ANGRY at any "heterornormative" relationships because it "marginalizes gay people", and how that ideology is working its way into the main cultural narrative that SJW ideology ALREADY dominates. Which is making its spread a lot faster, because in the end the gay rights movement mirrors the greater diversity movement, which means it needs its own "evil systemic oppressor" to rail against, it needs its own "whiteness", which is "heternormativity" became. (All of these movements have similar patterns because they are all underpinned by critical theory, which has a rather rigid central dogma)

What's essentially happening is disillusionment with what a post-equality world actually looks like--because, shocker, 97% of the people still aren't gay. So the majority of everything is still going to be heterosexual, from media to executives. But at some point in the gay rights movement, this belief propagated that once the "oppression" stopped it would mean homosexuality would be equal in all ways to straightness, not simply accepted as equal, but perfectly equivalent in terms of how much its seen, the representation in positions of power ect. Of course that didn't happen because statistical reality doesn't change (And only 3-5% of any population will rise to positions of prominence, so if you're total population is only 3%, then the number of people in prominent positions you should expect to see is TINY). But the lack of it began to be seen as its own form of oppression because the dogma insisted THAT is what true equality looks like, and equality of outcomes. Which is how you're starting to get genuine. Anti "heterenomative" language/ideological positions in the more hardcore SJW shit.

And you probably don't even recognize this as its happening. Let me ask you this, Chaos. Do you believe its oppression to not see a gay character on a TV show or movie? Do you think that's a sign of systemic heternormative oppression? Most Liberals today would say yes it is. Do you think most Liberals 20 years ago would have answered that way? The goal post radically shifted and no one even noticed, we went from "we just want tolerance" to "if you don't wax my feminine balls and accept my penis is as feminine as a vagina you're a bigot". And once more, the first pieces of culture falling to this will be media/entertainment, which is why you see the most aggressive displays of this new ideology as "IOOTI". But its not. The internet/media is where its spread to, the core of the cancer comes from the same place, a growing religion in Academia where new scripture is being built up and where thousands of new cultists are sent who are too dumb to be there but loans have no qualifiers and these classes are easy enough so that even a retard could ace out of them...As long as they are willing to accept the gospel of SJW into their life and be reborn. (Jazz hands)
 
Last edited:
  • 2Like
  • 1Cringe
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 3 users

Lithose

Buzzfeed Editor
25,946
113,035
Ah, here comes the original "brevity is the soul of wit" of FoH

Your joke came from an idiot in the play that always gave bad advice. Being right is the soul of wit. Being right is about predicting events.

But let me try be brief: The people warning about this shit have been right for years now, and predicted a lot of what's come to pass, much of which Chaos now sees in the mainstream. Maybe its time to stop dismissing that their observations as IOOTI or only describing "fringe" stuff and accept that they understand the pathology of these cancerous ideas.
 
  • 1Worf
  • 1Barf
Reactions: 1 users

Soygen

The Dirty Dozen For the Price of One
<Nazi Janitors>
28,326
43,169
I don't think that's right, but I'm too lazy to Google it.
 
  • 2Solidarity
Reactions: 1 users

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
I don't think that's right, but I'm too lazy to Google it.

He says it all the time, or used to when I listened to him regularly, which admittedly, 10 plus years ago now.

That's where I got it from at least
 

Soygen

The Dirty Dozen For the Price of One
<Nazi Janitors>
28,326
43,169
I say "Ms. Jackson if you're nasty." all the time, but I didn't make the quote up.
 
  • 1OK, Sure
Reactions: 1 user

iannis

Musty Nester
31,351
17,656
I think it was Oscar Wilde.

But i'm sure it's been a saying since middle english. Romans probably used it when they were telling each other to STFU but didn't feel particularly stabby right then.
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,672
18,377
I'm sure its not new by any stretch, just saying, I got it from listening to Limbaugh back in the day
 

chaos

Buzzfeed Editor
17,324
4,839
Your joke came from an idiot in the play that always gave bad advice. Being right is the soul of wit. Being right is about predicting events.

But let me try be brief: The people warning about this shit have been right for years now, and predicted a lot of what's come to pass, much of which Chaos now sees in the mainstream. Maybe its time to stop dismissing that their observations as IOOTI or only describing "fringe" stuff and accept that they understand the pathology of these cancerous ideas.
Just so we're all clear, no one is reading that long ass post anymore than they are reading Vanessa's long ass posts.

Without even getting into the "only on the internet thing is a solid burn but ultimately a misrepresentation of what I said at the time" thing, yes, some things have become more mainstream than they were, shockingly so. But if the answer to every problem is "SJW shit" it seems inevitable, doesn't it? No one keeping score of all the "sky is falling" antics or ridiculous conspiracy theories that didn't pan out. And to be clear, this specific idea of "let's use puberty blockers on kids" still isn't mainstream. Thankfully. But this is definitely a fringe idea. The wider concept of accepting children as trans, a bit more widespread, and also a bit more complicated.

That "pathology of cancerous ideas" schtick sounds like it is lifted straight from a Peterson video. Tell me you aren't one of those.
 
  • 2Solidarity
Reactions: 1 users

Lithose

Buzzfeed Editor
25,946
113,035
Btw, too. chaos chaos just to give you an example of this ideology in a pretty raw form. Go check out Nanette on Netflix. Here is a line from the show.

On Being Different

"This tension is yours. I am not helping you anymore. You need to learn what this feels like, because this tension is what not-normals carry inside of them all of the time. It is dangerous to be different."


Now this special was dogshit and didn't do well, but look up the media coverage for it. She is a media darling and they fawn over her. And her rhetoric is all about making "normal" people tense so they feel how "not-normals" feel...Because to her, normalcy IS oppression. "Normal people" not being like her IS oppression because there are so many "not normals" that no matter how they act, their existence will make her feel "other". The ONLY solution to this is to destroy what is considered "normalcy". And this outlook has taken over the progressive wing of the Liberal movement/ideology. They feel like the "normies" must recognize the privilege of normalcy, and dismantle it--that is what they are talking about when they talk about "whiteness" or "heternormativity" or "privilege". Its why you see these terms associated with behaviors that are simply considered "normal".

Madilyn-Smith-Entity-Heteronormativity-1.png
 
Last edited:
  • 1Cringe
Reactions: 1 user
Status
Not open for further replies.