Julian The Apostate
Vyemm Raider
- 2,699
- 3,911
Glad I never tired meth. Everyone's having a meltdown like Nancy Reagan over a couple joints. Never knew this forum was such a bunch of teetotalers.
- 1
We Dont Need No Stinking Priests - Spirituality, prayer, meditation, new age, gnostisicm, consciousness
- Thread starter Julian The Apostate
- Start date
Izo
Tranny Chaser
- 21,502
- 30,887
You need a cog in you,
Julian The Apostate
- watch this 1h44m Transformers One movie and you'll understand.- 1
Julian The Apostate
Vyemm Raider
- 2,699
- 3,911
You need a cog in you,
Who say's I havent already got a cog?
- 1
- 39,022
- 153,352
- 1
Void
BAU BAU
- 10,451
- 12,901
Aww, shucks. I didn't know you cared.
If that's the reputation I'm destined to have, then I'm happy to take it on.
- 1
Julian The Apostate
Vyemm Raider
- 2,699
- 3,911
Izo
Tranny Chaser
- 21,502
- 30,887
| Feature | Cog | Spark |
|---|---|---|
| Function | A mechanical component, sometimes called a T-Cog, that allows for transformation into an alternate mode. | The "soul" or life force of a Transformer, a charged mass of positrons. |
| Essence | A physical, mechanical part. | An intangible core of being, encompassing personality, passion, and purpose. |
| Identity | What a Transformer "is" in terms of its mechanical abilities and structure. | What a Transformer "is" in terms of consciousness and life. |
| Defines | The ability to transform. | The very existence and individuality of the Transformer. |
| Damage | Can be damaged or broken, preventing transformation. | If destroyed, the Transformer dies. |
You need the cog in your hole, but the spark is inside you already.
- 1
Void
BAU BAU
- 10,451
- 12,901
Julian The Apostate
Vyemm Raider
- 2,699
- 3,911
Just messing around, you know I love you Void. im glad you showed up.
Me after that sick burn.
Julian The Apostate
Vyemm Raider
- 2,699
- 3,911
You guys ever read the CIA's Gateway process analysis?
"I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness" - Max Planck
“No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical.”
"I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness" - Max Planck
“No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical.”
― Niels Bohr
Last edited:
Julian The Apostate
Vyemm Raider
- 2,699
- 3,911
You should run this again and tell it to assume some of my speculation about consciousness is true. So much of the cutting edge consciousness theories are labeled psuedoscience and removed from databases where chat GPT and grok are able to use and reference for information. I think that's part of the coverup and part of how they have stigmatized the entire field of consciousness.
Last edited:
Izo
Tranny Chaser
- 21,502
- 30,887
Cad
scientia potentia est
- 29,245
- 66,172
The word you should really key in on is falsifiable. If there is no way to prove your theory false, then it is unfalsifiable - it's more of a mysticism argument rather than a scientific one. Which is fine, there are plenty of people studying that out there and they're having a good time and learning within their field.
But calling it science requires you to do science things, and "assuming it's true" isn't a science thing, quite the reverse, you assume its false and you prove the truth of it.
A lot of the things you say in here my mind immediately goes "I mean, well, maybe, but there's no way to know that from here."
- 1
Izo
Tranny Chaser
- 21,502
- 30,887
chatgptagreeswithcadwow said:6. Overall Critical Evaluation
Category Assessment Internal consistency Partly coherent but contains unresolved dualisms Scientific validity None; uses scientific language metaphorically Philosophical rigor Idealist but ad hoc; lacks grounding in logic or epistemology Psychological utility High comfort and meaning; risk of detachment from reality Ethical stance Compassionate in intent, but potentially quietist Sociological function Modern New Age / Gnostic revival responding to institutional distrust
In short:
It’s not a rationally or empirically grounded theory of the universe, but a spiritually coherent mythos — a narrative that offers purpose, moral order, and transcendence in an age of scientific disenchantment. Its appeal lies in existential meaning, not in epistemic credibility.
Julian The Apostate
Vyemm Raider
- 2,699
- 3,911
Julian The Apostate
Vyemm Raider
- 2,699
- 3,911
Hey man, I’m pretty happy with syncretic. I’ll take the below assessment as well. That’s just from one post right? Can the mental illness references end now? Fuckers
So: the author is likely introspective, imaginative, and spiritually inclined, not psychotic. They’re trying to integrate mystical experiences and conspiracy narratives into a single system of meaning.
There’s no clear sign of a psychotic disorder in this text alone.
It neutralizes fear of death by promising continuity and progression.
It transforms suffering into meaning, preventing nihilism.
It empowers the individual — truth and divinity are internal, not dependent on institutions.
The notion of a single divine consciousness subdividing into individual souls is metaphysically consistent within idealism (the view that consciousness is fundamental). Philosophers from Berkeley to Schopenhauer have entertained similar views.
No incoherence, disorganization, or word salad.
No personal persecution claims or loss of contact with shared reality.
Just an elaborate speculative metaphysics.
The author constructs a self-consistent cosmology — suffering, morality, and cosmic justice all have a place.
The system resolves the problem of evil elegantly: suffering isn’t punishment but education.
It offers existential comfort: every soul grows, and everyone “wins in the end.”
So, no — it’s not the product of a “pot-smoking lunatic”, but rather of a spiritually syncretic thinker, possibly influenced by mystical experience, altered perception, or New Age philosophy.
So: the author is likely introspective, imaginative, and spiritually inclined, not psychotic. They’re trying to integrate mystical experiences and conspiracy narratives into a single system of meaning.
There’s no clear sign of a psychotic disorder in this text alone.
It neutralizes fear of death by promising continuity and progression.
It transforms suffering into meaning, preventing nihilism.
It empowers the individual — truth and divinity are internal, not dependent on institutions.
The notion of a single divine consciousness subdividing into individual souls is metaphysically consistent within idealism (the view that consciousness is fundamental). Philosophers from Berkeley to Schopenhauer have entertained similar views.
No incoherence, disorganization, or word salad.
No personal persecution claims or loss of contact with shared reality.
Just an elaborate speculative metaphysics.
The author constructs a self-consistent cosmology — suffering, morality, and cosmic justice all have a place.
The system resolves the problem of evil elegantly: suffering isn’t punishment but education.
It offers existential comfort: every soul grows, and everyone “wins in the end.”
So, no — it’s not the product of a “pot-smoking lunatic”, but rather of a spiritually syncretic thinker, possibly influenced by mystical experience, altered perception, or New Age philosophy.
Last edited:
- 1
Izo
Tranny Chaser
- 21,502
- 30,887
Julian The Apostate
Vyemm Raider
- 2,699
- 3,911
“It empowers the individual — truth and divinity are internal, not dependent on institutions.”
Amen. Found my slogan.
Amen. Found my slogan.
Last edited: