man, we're really getting the short one here with our immigrant population of arabs and turks. I thought it was bad enough your hispanics are at least christian while ours are mulsims. But your girls are actually good looking?Astrocreep makes a good point and there's no shortage of smokin hot latinas to choose from (for those who have issues with cheating).
Can a christian man marry four muslim women? How does that work?man, we're really getting the short one here with our immigrant population of arabs and turks. I thought it was bad enough your hispanics are at least christian while ours are mulsims. But your girls are actually good looking?
They absolutely are, but so are men. Have you ever heard of Okcupid? Or more generally used in business, 'human capital'?Why anyone would be surprised by that, I have no idea. Women aren't possessions that you can order online. Go figure!
They're products for you to check out and see if you like their features. It's no different than products on Amazon. The currency isn't money directly, but it's a combination of social status, attractive personality traits, etc, of which money plays a part.Pretty sure I can't go to okcupid and send someone $4000 to ship me a smokin hot wifey, maybe I was using the site all wrong tho when I checked it out.
Is your ideal woman someone who all the men get to share Dumarx?They're products for you to check out and see if you like their features. It's no different than products on Amazon. The currency isn't money directly, but it's a combination of social status, attractive personality traits, etc, of which money plays a part.
The 4k mail-order is just more honest in the transaction.
My ideal woman is mute with no gag reflex.Is your ideal woman someone who all the men get to share Dumarx?
a great summary of relationships.My ideal woman is mute with no gag reflex.
I'll bring it to point with a question. What is the difference in the following:
1. You pay $4k for a hot Russian bride. This transaction was as honest and conspicuous in intent as possible. That is to say, there was nothing hidden about the transactional nature of what took place: you paid money for a relationship, directly.
2. You go on okcupid, send out your messages, get some back. The ones you get back 'like your profile' enough to message, but what does that mean precisely? You met certain criteria that this woman deems attractive: maybe you have travel photos, abs, witty remarks, etc - a certain combination of features (not one thing, but likely a combination of them) that made this woman send a reply. Now, the fact is thatmost of these features can be tied back to money. If you travel often, you're certainly more interesting and cultured, but this interesting, cultured personality was paid for with capital. If you have a Phd in psychology and omg, she thinks it's so hot she wants to 'pick your brain' (how many times have I heard this?) - that degree was paid for, was also brought about by money. Almost any activity you do or perform will in fact involve money to some degree.
Both relationships were brought about the same way. The latter was masked in terms of how it came about, of how it arose. In both respects, the transactional nature of 'features that are attractive' can be seen: the former was paid out for the relationship directly (and thus more honest), while the latter, again being economically masked, generated attraction by traits that were paid for.
You view them the same way: as products. Okcupid is very similar to Amazon in a psychological sense.
Another problem with the B types is after being married for 20 years, when they know you're trapped, they come out of their submissive cave often looking like...