You know you're getting old when.....

lurker

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
2,046
5,345
Those graphics confuse the fuck out of me. What are the white zones on the left and right? Softer vision? What the fuck does that mean? I always thought they were like parallel lines.
When you first get progressives you will find you have to turn your head a lot to keep your eyes within the viewing area of the lenses. You can’t keep your head still and shift your eyes to the side to see something clearly on your left, for instance. You need to turn your head in that direction. It becomes second nature within days if not hours. Not a big deal, IMHO.
 
  • 1Like
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 1 users

Borzak

<Bronze Donator>
29,446
39,920
Moms dad would be 128 today, and I remember him. Mentioned it before I am 55 and my uncle died in WWII, two months before my mom was born.
 
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 1 user

Control

Golden Baronet of the Realm
6,045
16,852
progressives?
They say you get used to them eventually, but I fucking hated the pair I tried. When I first tried them, I was like, "They gave me the wrong glasses. There's no fucking way they're supposed to be like this!" I think I toughed it out for a week hoping to hit the magic inflection point. I'd rather have multiple pairs that actually work for the use case. I'm sure it depends on how bad your eyes are, but if I'm not driving or reading/computing, it really doesn't matter if I can see or not, and basically everything I read is on a screen that lets me change the text size and distance anyway. So now I just keep a pair in the car and otherwise embrace the squint.
 

Haus

I am Big Balls!
<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
21,293
87,841
1784678999680.png
 
  • 4Solidarity
  • 1Rustled
Reactions: 4 users

Lanx

<Prior Amod>
77,729
183,093
for progressives, outside the channel is blurry - your viewing range is within the middle channel and in those areas are the different focus areas.

The newer ones, the viewing channel is much much wider and its basically a non-issue, but some and depending on insurance coverage - the "old style" is all there is or may be covered.

I mostly am saying this to prep you if you have never had glasses let alone progressives, you do not get "the whole lenses" for viewing and at your prescription level... that is also why some people just buy "normal" glasses and then readers. I have been in progressives since 3rd/4th grade so it is actually hard for me to use single vision, I got single vision sunglasses - as a test, because as I mentioned getting my alignment and valley in the lens perfect is getting more important as I get older - but single vision is hard to adjust because my eyes are used to not "doing" the focus adjustments, and relying on moving my head to put my LoS into the proper viewing channel of the progressive lens.
is it like looking at a domed fish tank bowl and searching for the spot that is ultra clear?
 

lurker

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
2,046
5,345
is it like looking at a domed fish tank bowl and searching for the spot that is ultra clear?
No. If the glasses are properly fitted when you get them, and that needs to be patiently done, you naturally look through the prescription part of the lens. The non-prescription part is difficult to locate with your eyes. For me, I need to try and strain to look through the "wrong" part of the lens and it's not fish bowly, just not as sharp as the center is. Locating the near and far zones is second nature with a few days if not hours.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Goatface

Ssraeszha Raider
11,935
24,019
that type really don't look that bad to have done.

1786384050898.png


while this type is still used for people with really bad issues, think was the common replacement when i broke my knee in the 90's. i not had a replacement, but the ortho i went to had displays of all the hardware they used. the knee one was huge.

1786383923227.png
 
  • 2Wow!
  • 1Mother of God
Reactions: 2 users

Burren

Golden Baronet of the Realm
7,130
12,666
that type really don't look that bad to have done.

View attachment 636773

while this type is still used for people with really bad issues, think was the common replacement when i broke my knee in the 90's. i not had a replacement, but the ortho i went to had displays of all the hardware they used. the knee one was huge.

View attachment 636770
I'm expect my left knee will be replaced within 5-6 years. Not bothered by the idea.