Ya because implanting a cloned blastocyst into a living, human uterus is so easy to pull off and keep quiet so the researchers involved aren't convicted of felonies and ostracized from the scientific community. I'm sure it's happening EVERY day, in labs all around the world!
Probably not every day, they probably have a lot of back to the drawing board time.
Troll mode? You don't know me bro. It's 10 PM on a Friday night, watching a movie. Leave? I am not in the military bro.
I know right. It's almost like it isn't actually possible to clone a human, it's not that simple is it. It should be.
I think you need to lay off the googling. You contradict yourself saying that it isn't possible, yet hundred of labs are doing it.
Ok let me walk this through step by step.
Would you define the 'nothing' that would make you say God doesn't exist? Something can come from nothing, you know - Lawrence Krauss
It's not even being tried is what is stopping it isn't that your party stance here?
Tea already explained why it's not happening, and why it's unethical. Someone probably could clone a human being and even bring a baby to term at this point, but there's a very, very good chance it would be some horrible mutant flipper baby. And even if it does turn out perfectly normal and healthy, it raises a multitude of other questions (is it the same person legally as the original? Who are it's parents and legal guardians? So on and so forth).
Show me one example of a peer reviewed article or hell any where a lab was making zygotes via cloning that progressed past 7days in vitro and then attempted to implant them into a uterus.
You are stating that because it's hard is why nobody is doing it.
There would most likely be defects. The main reason why somatic cell nuclear transfer fails so much is due to the genomes of different cell types being activated in different ways. So when SCNT is done, the DNA does not properly respond to the environment of the egg cytoplasm and fails, or it develops into a teratoma or something crazy looking.
With other animals to better understand it. You don't jump directly into human testing with something. You do know we are extremely similar to mice and can attribute a vast majority of our understanding of diseases and treatments to expieiments on them, right?