Mist does, duh. This is all perfectly logically sound.Who decides what constitutes, 'civil'?
Mist does, duh. This is all perfectly logically sound.Who decides what constitutes, 'civil'?
If Mist had been a man you wouldn't have suggested he needed to be raped.If Mist had been a man I would be free.
Yes it has never been suggested on this board that a man get raped.If Mist had been a man you wouldn't have suggested he needed to be raped.
psst. Maybe you're in the Rickshaw, and those dudes aren't, because you're a fucking asshole and nobody likes you.Yes it has never been suggested on this board that a man get raped.
I am here because noodle has a hard on for me. And it was not about mist being a woman until those like you started bringing it up.psst. Maybe you're in the Rickshaw, and those dudes aren't, because you're a fucking asshole and nobody likes you.
Maybe it's not about Mist being a woman at all.
Keep singing yourself to sleep though, brother.
I didn't do nuffin! He jus' hates me!I am here because noodle has a hard on for me. And it was not about mist being a woman until those like you started bringing it up.
No one has to decide anything, I'm not talking about changing laws, I'm talking about changing attitudes. If you spend all your time defending vulgarity and hatred, people (very organized people with sympathetic ears throughout the fourth estate) WILL use that opportunity to try to take your free speech away from you, and they will be able to make some compelling arguments.Who decides what constitutes, 'civil'?
People love porn. Hate, not so much.People vs Larry Flint suggests otherwise.
Okay, so you at least see the fucking argument here.There wouldn't be a need to defend vulgarity and hatred if people weren't trying to infringe on the freedom of vulgar and hateful people to express themselves.
I think society is marked by dramatic pendulum swings, Mist. And when we have people equating vulgar language with rape and terrorism? A pendulum swing is coming. The thing is, you believe it is coming because we're choosing to defend the indefensible; but I see it as coming because of the dramatic ideological creep of modern day "immortality". Your statement, I think is a pretty poignant example of why it has to come...When words can be diluted to such a point that men joking about dongles, or asking someone to coffee or in this case a few vulgar remarks by young idiots--can be construed as "problematic" and aspects of "rape culture"? Then we are through the looking glass.So you're willing to endure the backlash of a generation of censorship if it means 'winning' against the SJWs in the end? You really think that kind of dramatic pendulum swinging is preferable to the restoration of civility in public discourse?
OK so those boys holding up that sign was 'hatred'. It's the year 2035, Mist is Prexerdent of the North American Union.People love porn. Hate, not so much.
Maybe if people didn't act like absurd reactionaries all the fucking time, and actually tried to aim down the rational center of an argument, it wouldn't be.I think society is marked by dramatic pendulum swings, Mist.
I have no down the school will deal with them. They have to keep theirstudentscustomers happy.OK so those boys holding up that sign was 'hatred'. It's the year 2035, Mist is Prexerdent of the North American Union.
What is the punishment for these boys guilty of hate speech/terrorism in your post SJWpocalyptic world?