Get a free Kyle Rittenhouse at Culver's

Status
Not open for further replies.
Adebisi

Adebisi

Clump of Cells
<Silver Donator>
27,682
32,730
Still don't see how having Kyle testify was good. You have videos and the prosecutions witnesses all backing up a slam dunk self defense.

The video is your testimony, Kyle and team. Jfc

I didn't observe anything during his testimony that was a positive for the defence
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
Janx

Janx

<Silver Donator>
6,345
17,125
Adebisi said:
Still don't see how having Kyle testify was good. You have videos and the prosecutions witnesses all backing up a slam dunk self defense.

The video is your testimony, Kyle and team. Jfc

I didn't observe anything during his testimony that was a positive for the defence
Click to expand...
Its been said but its an optics thing. Yeah tis a slam dunk but there could be people on the jury that think its a sign he's hiding something. Damned if you do damned if you don't
 
Rajaah

Rajaah

Honorable Member
<Gold Donor>
11,582
15,242
Intrinsic said:
I'm catching up but what am I watching here? They're spending 30 minutes going over this guys testimony and he's admitting they asked him to change it and he felt pressured? Like wtf is happening? They offered him a juice box to be his friend?!~
Click to expand...

According to the 2030 Ava Duvernay Netflix documentary on this case, the defense didn't even let the witnesses have food!
 
  • 1Worf
Reactions: 1 user
Lightning Lord Rule

Il_Duce Lightning Lord Rule

Lightning Fast
<Charitable Administrator>
10,627
54,825
Gavinmad said:
keep going, I'm almost there.
Click to expand...
Rosenbaum was shot 4 times in .76s destroying his pelvis, which had been used in earlier crimes.

He then LITERALLY disarmed Grosskreutz, forcing a reorganization of his social calendar for life.
 
  • 2Like
  • 2Worf
  • 2Solidarity
Reactions: 6 users
Byr

Byr

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
3,703
5,060
69741_sanatqfetubsx1h.png
 
  • 7Repost
Reactions: 6 users
Lanx

Lanx

<Prior Amod>
61,438
135,611
Adebisi said:
Still don't see how having Kyle testify was good. You have videos and the prosecutions witnesses all backing up a slam dunk self defense.

The video is your testimony, Kyle and team. Jfc

I didn't observe anything during his testimony that was a positive for the defence
Click to expand...
b/c jurys are dumb and the da already tried to poison them w/

"why did you remain silent until now"

and even the judge went off on him

12 jurors, at least one of them will have the thought
"he didn't take the stand, he guilty!!!"

i have watched enough true crime that whenever a slam dunk innocent comes back as guilty, there is that inbred juror that says
"well he must be guilty if he stayed silent"!
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
AladainAF

AladainAF

Best Rabbit
<Gold Donor>
12,867
30,832
Lendarios said:
Except that no one buys that you shot at someone with out the intent to kill them or maim them. Because it doesn't exists, you shot at someone with the intent or hurting or killing them.
Click to expand...

lol, someones never taken gun safety course before. Figures
 
Voyce

Voyce

Shit Lord Supreme
<Donor>
7,325
24,164
  • 1Like
  • 1Seriously?
Reactions: 1 users
Zefah

Zefah

<Gold Donor>
2,225
6,550
Lendarios said:
Acting like he didn't know what would happened when he fired a high power weapon into someone chest at close range was his worst moment.

Instead of answering the question he turn into a robot.
Click to expand...

He did admit that he knew shooting the guy could be fatal. However his stated reason for pulling the trigger was not because he wanted to kill the guy, but that he wanted to stop the guy from shooting and potentially killing him.

Ahh fuck it, why am I even bothering.
 
Last edited:
  • 9Like
Reactions: 8 users
Gravel

Gravel

Mr. Poopybutthole
37,006
118,639
Chris said:
Hate to break it to you but they are the same thing. You just gave one set of laws a fancy title and I assume a higher threshold to change.
Click to expand...
Someone posted something very poignant a few weeks ago about the Constitution and I wish I had bookmarked it.

But essentially the difference is in the US, the right is inalienable. In every other country, the right is given to you by the government. Which means they could also revoke that right at any time.

The original post was about how essentially, all the rights in the US belong to the citizenry, but we've delegated some of them to the government (defense, border security, etc) because they're too unwieldy for an individual. They're always delegated at the lowest level first (local, county, state, federal) before being delegated UP the chain.
 
  • 3Like
Reactions: 2 users
Rajaah

Rajaah

Honorable Member
<Gold Donor>
11,582
15,242
Identikit said:
twitter fags are getting started by comparing kyles crying to Kavanaugh.

I hope this kid walks free, the left riots again, and there are even more Kyles there to blast some fucking biceps and merc pedos. I think at this point both sides are starting to learn that violence is the only thing that solves shit. The government doesnt solve things.
Click to expand...

That's the thing here that I haven't really seen anyone discuss anywhere:

-If Kyle is found guilty, I doubt there will be any violent right-wing riots or violent regular people riots. We're all too busy going to work and acting like decent humans.

-If Kyle is found not guilty, there will most likely be violent left-wing riots.

I'm not sure how the Cult of Bullshit justifies their behavior over and over again. Only one side is being violent, and it's the side constantly accusing the other side of being violent. It's like a civil war with only one side engaging in combat. Not sure where this leads but it's nowhere good.
 
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 1 user
Butthurt

Butthurt

<Nazi Janitors>
6,942
36,617
Zapatta said:
It should be illegal to arm yourself where there is a high probability of violence.

Click to expand...

Lol, i’d go for that law but that loser has to give up something in trade: if the cops fail to stop a riot or permit one to happen, then every cop should be civilly liable for the ensuing property damage, every executive branch person civilly liable for the same, and all of them must be immediately removed from office and lose their pensions and all benefits, and essentially barred from working for government permanently, and said law crosses state lines.
 
  • 4Like
  • 2Solidarity
  • 2Mic Drop
Reactions: 9 users
Lightning Lord Rule

Il_Duce Lightning Lord Rule

Lightning Fast
<Charitable Administrator>
10,627
54,825
Butthurt said:
Lol, i’d go for that law but that loser has to give up something in trade: if the cops fail to stop a riot or permit one to happen, then every cop should be civilly liable for the ensuing property damage, every executive branch person civilly liable for the same, and all of them must be immediately removed from office and lose their pensions and all benefits, and essentially barred from working for government permanently, and said law crosses state lines.
Click to expand...
Love it, just have 1 amendment:
All surveillance can be used to produce active bounties on any participants in unlawful activity in said riot or civil unrest.​
 
  • 4Like
Reactions: 3 users
GuardianX

GuardianX

Perpetually Pessimistic
<Bronze Donator>
6,793
17,153
Rajaah said:
Jesus Christ.

Tariq Nasheed, former pimp, everybody. There are young people who think this guy is a reputable source of information.
Click to expand...

I mean he's amazing for information, bad information. Basically take whatever stance he has an invert it.

Aside from his take on a certain religion thats kicked out of, what...119 nations?
 
Ambiturner

Ambiturner

Ssraeszha Raider
16,040
19,502
Lendarios said:
It is perfectly understandable he would lie under that circumstances.
Click to expand...

That's about the only thing the prosecution got him on. Pretty comical that him lying to a mob trying to kill him and him not taking the orders of some random bitch in a crowd are the best points the prosecutor was able to make
 
Status
Not open for further replies.