Get a free Kyle Rittenhouse at Culver's
- Thread starter Nirgon
- Start date
- Status
- 7,547
- 11,828
No difference? First, changing the actual constitution is a bit more involved than just a few extra hoops to jump through. But the main difference is the ideas behind it.
When the government, state, kings, dictator, etc write up the rights of citizens they don't usually include provisions for owning and using weapons based on the notion if the government oversteps their bounds the consent of the governed can be withdrawn and the government/country reset via force by the people.
Based on founding documents the hoops the ruling class may have to jump through is a noose if they don't abide by the will of the people. But, sure, on paper where it says "you have rights" I suppose it's no different.
At least be less retarded and argue the more nuanced position that America has lost an edge and doesn't understand its own founding so there may functionally be no difference at this point. Not that there isn't technically or philosophically differences.
- 2
Aaron
Goonsquad Officer
- 8,194
- 18,290
This is the best summary I've seen so far and it should be blindingly obvious to all. It's about intimidating ANYONE who dares to protect themselves, their families, their properties, their communities when BLM and Anti-Fa come marching, burning and looting. And the scary thing is, it'll probably work, too.
- 5
AladainAF
Best Rabbit
- 12,867
- 30,832
Borzak
Bronze Baron of the Realm
- 24,820
- 32,300
Going to come down to how many people on the jury think Kyle had no right/business being allowed a gun at all or outside with one. The prosecutor and defense can harp endlessly on the law. But will likely come down to that. They'll agree he was attacked but...
- 3
Sanrith Descartes
Von Clippowicz
- 41,595
- 107,708
Aint gonna lie, I would tear that ass up if given the opportunity. Just use a ballgag to silence the liberal talking points.
- 3
- 1
- 1
Sanrith Descartes
Von Clippowicz
- 41,595
- 107,708
AladainAF
Best Rabbit
- 12,867
- 30,832
I think there's almost no doubt he'll be found not guilty on all the major stuff, but I think he's going to be found guilty on reckless endangerment. I think that's going to be the "compromise" from the jury for "all sides".
I hate this. Because in reality, he should be not guilty on everything, but I just don't see that happening in the justice system in 2021. Juries in general are too tainted. I guarantee you some of these jurors are reading/watching trial stuff while not in the courtroom.
- 3
GuardianX
Perpetually Pessimistic
- 6,785
- 17,138
In this case specifically I don't know what would taint them, a kid being a kid?
I could see tainted AGAINST the state but against the kid? I would find that hard unless a person came in biased originally.
- 2
AladainAF
Best Rabbit
- 12,867
- 30,832
Reading shit like CNN or MSNBC's interpretation of testimony and then second guessing their initial thoughts while in the courtroom.
- 3
GuardianX
Perpetually Pessimistic
- 6,785
- 17,138
I always forget that people still believe "EXPERTS" on old MSM.
- 2
AladainAF
Best Rabbit
- 12,867
- 30,832
People still believe folks like Paul Krugman are economic "experts".
- 1
- 1
- 1
Kharzette
Watcher of Overs
- 5,028
- 3,672
Sanrith Descartes
Von Clippowicz
- 41,595
- 107,708
Rajaah
Honorable Member
- 11,544
- 15,219
What I'm getting: This whole thing is basically a spook op to send the message to people that you are not to resist violent mobs, lest you be demonized or imprisoned. But also, it's sending the even more insidious message that the violent mob members who charge and try to kill the resister... are the ones who are going to be celebrated and enshrined as heroes.
The message is being received by the NPCs, the intended audience. I'm pretty sure Stalin had a playbook for this stuff somewhere.
- 5
- Status