slippery
<Bronze Donator>
I'm downCan I pay one of you fine gentlemen to just punch me in the mouth whenever I have the urge to play this stupid fucking game?
I'm downCan I pay one of you fine gentlemen to just punch me in the mouth whenever I have the urge to play this stupid fucking game?
I agree. Warsong didn't suddenly pop up in the latest expansion and Warrior wasn't suddenly dogshit. Warrior has been a really bad arena class for a long time and Warsong never changed that. Much more upset that the new pally power card allows two in the deck and is ridiculous in both formats. They obviously don't play test at all.Why do I keep seeing that come up? Warrior was already dogshit in arena. I never remember meeting one with a WC and getting my ass kicked as a result. There's lots of better evidence that they don't care about the format, more specifically that they are mismanaging it at best and are completely clueless at worst.
Challenger or Murloc Knight? MC isn't really powerful for arena, you're rarely going to see one and who will pick very many paladin secrets on the off chance? Murloc Knight in arena though is out of control, and its a nice card in constructed too. Especially for standard midrange pally, but it can work with the secret shell too.Much more upset that the new pally power card allows two in the deck and is ridiculous in both formats. They obviously don't play test at all.
They've decided to sidestep the opportunity to nerf WC so it is no longer viable for constructed but good for Arena.Why do I keep seeing that come up? Warrior was already dogshit in arena. I never remember meeting one with a WC and getting my ass kicked as a result.
Did you mean Shaman? Because Rogue is one of the very best classes in arena right now, many consider it better than Paladin even (though maybe harder to draft and play).Warrior is at least very viable on the ladder still. Rogue is pretty much bad in both formats. If any class is getting shafted by design flaws right now that's the one.
Yeah you are way off on Rogue being bad in Arena. They are inarguably ranked #3 or higher. Rogue has been top 4ish in Arena since GvG and TgT helped a lot. I might rank it Rogue > Paladin > Mage even. All three are neck and neck and then Warlock is #4.I get your point now I think, they could have at least nerfed its power for the constructed game but done something to make it viable in arena drafts at least. Still, I don't really think it makes warriorworseper se, its going from a very meh draft pick to an almost "never pick" one. Usually there will be a better common option. Its not like you only get three class cards or three neutrals.
Warrior is at least very viable on the ladder still. Rogue is pretty much bad in both formats. If any class is getting shafted by design flaws right now that's the one.
I think no Fel Reaver mech shaman is about as good as it gets now, that's what I use if I have to play it anyway. Not sure how slow more traditional shaman holds up, probably not so well. I think Kolento was playing crusher shaman on his stream last week.Anyone have a viable Shaman deck? I'm feeling the urge to work on my shaman level....The only character I have under 60.