Lumi's Batshit Insane Thread

Julian The Apostate said:

I’d rather mince my cock and balls with a cheese grater than “discuss” science with you.

Click to expand...

Him and 3301 think the job of science is to 'prove things'. They don't even know what science is at the most fundamental level.

Julian The Apostate said:

I’d rather mince my cock and balls with a cheese grater than “discuss” science with you.

Click to expand...

This isn't a discussion though? If anything this should be fun for you since you claim to know about and enjoy science. The task is simple really. All you have to do is prove that you can produce an experiment that demonstrates that you can form a rainbow without needing to use a mirror or sunlight.

I'm trying to figure out the end game from this little troll of "lets pretend Lumi doesnt know what a prism is".

AngryGerbil said:

But you've already read it right? You always claim that you've read Dawkins.

(Should be showing a link to the book "Unweaving The Rainbow" but it's not showing up on my end...)

Click to expand...

Other than containing the word rainbow, this has literally nothing to do with the contents of my post whatsoever so I'm not sure what your point is exactly by suggesting this book?

Aldarion said:

I'm trying to figure out the end game from this little troll of "lets pretend Lumi doesnt know what a prism is".

Click to expand...

Ya, I don't think Gerbil realizes that prisms are mirrors. He's a little slow though so bare with him.

Lumi said:

Other than containing the word rainbow, this has literally nothing to do with the contents of my post whatsoever so I'm not sure what your point is exactly by suggesting this book?

Click to expand...

Well, but, it does. He literally explains exactly how rainbows work and are formed. It involves rain, distances of many miles, and the interaction of two gigantic spheres one of which gives off its own visible light.

So you build me a room big enough to house two spheres, one the size of earth and the other the size of the sun, make the room 8 light-minutes cubed, and give me several million gallons of water and I will make a rainbow indoors for you.

No bronze-age 'firmament' required.

Lumi said:

Ya, I don't think Gerbil realizes that prisms are mirrors. He's a little slow though so bare with him.

Click to expand...

Did you just type this? Like, for real actually type those words?

Lumi said:

Ya, I don't think Gerbil realizes that prisms are mirrors. He's a little slow though so bare with him.

Click to expand...

Thats what you were going with? How boring. Is this tied to flat earth mythology in some way? Claiming that refraction and reflection are the same thing?

"prisms are mirrors" lol

edit: "bare with him" might have been funnier. I'm not sure.

Lumi, what is the difference between a window and a mirror? Please explain.

Aldarion said:

Thats what you were going with? How boring. Is this tied to flat earth mythology in some way? Claiming that refraction and reflection are the same thing?

"prisms are mirrors" lol

edit: "bare with him" might have been funnier. I'm not sure.

Click to expand...

I literally just proved it with the screen shot? Are you high or something?

Is the refractive index of the image I posted above high enough to be reflective?

Not to kink shame, Lumi, but this is a weird troll. Even for you.

AngryGerbil said:

Lumi, what is the difference between a window and a mirror? Please explain.

Click to expand...

Can you see yourself in a window? If so does that then not mean that it can act as a mirror?

Definitition of mirror : a reflective surface

A window is a reflective surface and can therefore be considered to be like a mirror. The same goes for a prism. So like I said, please demonstrate the formation of a rainbow without any sort of reflective object. If this cannot be done, this proves that there must be an object outside that is acting as a mirror which would be the firmament.

AngryGerbil said:

Well, but, it does. He literally explains exactly how rainbows work and are formed. It involves rain, distances of many miles, and the interaction of two gigantic spheres one of which gives off its own visible light.

So you build me a room big enough to house two spheres, one the size of earth and the other the size of the sun, make the room 8 light-minutes cubed, and give me several million gallons of water and I will make a rainbow indoors for you.

Click to expand...

You can make a rainbow indoors with just a flashlight, water, and a mirror. No need for gigantic spheres of any kind or more than just a cup full of water.

Lumi said:

You can make a rainbow indoors with just a flashlight, water, and a mirror. No need for gigantic spheres of any kind or more than just a cup full of water.

Click to expand...

Is a droplet of water in the air a 'mirror'?

AngryGerbil said:

Is a droplet of water in the air a 'mirror'?

Click to expand...

If what I say is true then no it shouldn't be. This is how a rainbow forms according to mainstream science.

"A rainbow is caused by sunlight and atmospheric conditions. Light enters a water droplet, slowing down and bending as it goes from air to denser water. The light reflects off the inside of the droplet, separating into its component wavelengths--or colors. When light exits the droplet, it makes a rainbow."

So if this is true then it should be possible to form a rainbow indoors with only the use of water and light. However, my argument against this is that this is not the case. The light needs to first be reflected off of an object before it passes through the water before it can make a rainbow which proves that it is not being caused by light reflecting off of the inside of a droplet. This means that there must be an object outside that is acting as a mirror.