May users have a personal thread in the rickshaw?

May users have a personal thread in the rickshaw?

  • Yes

    Votes: 271 66.6%

  • No

    Votes: 136 33.4%
  • Total voters
    407
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Soygen

Soygen

The Dirty Dozen For the Price of One
<Nazi Janitors>
28,573
45,202
Mario Speedwagon said:
Who fucking cares? Some of you are just unbelievably autistic about this shit. The absolute horror that someone might shitpost in the rickshaw and think they "won" . Fucking let it go. I do not understand this obsession with making people feel "punished" for shitposting.
Click to expand...
Shaw'd member doing a victory lap:

giphy.gif
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users
pharmakos

pharmakos

soʞɐɯɹɐɥd
<Bronze Donator>
16,305
-2,233
a_skeleton_03 said:
I get that from a user standpoint but from an admin standpoint you can see why I want some defined rules and for a "punishment" to be effective right?

Can you all not see that?

We have people begging to increase our numbers but when we have people that never learn from their "punishment" the new people aren't going to stay.
Click to expand...

i don't see how keeping them quarantined to the shaw isn't effective. if you're worried about whether or not they change their behavior in a long term sense, well, they don't need to -- if they never change, then keep them permanently on RRP.
 
  • 3Like
  • 1Faggotry
Reactions: 3 users
hodj

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
Tarrant said:
I'm not dishonest about anything. i got a random email about a reply to this thread and it was Tuco quoting you. I'm on my phone and didn't feel like scrolling back. So lazy maybe, dishonest, no.

You're a pretty angry person, it's sort of facinating really.

Good luck with your crusade sir, I wish you well.
Click to expand...

You mistake honesty for anger because you are dishonest, and are so used to being lied to in your life.

Sorry not sorry. All you get from me is hard truths spoken plain. You interpret that as anger, thats all you.
 
A

a_skeleton_03

<Banned>
29,948
29,765
Alkorin said:
Why not simply stop seeing it as "punishment" and start seeing it as "quarantine"? They want to post all day in the shaw? Let them. Let them shit up every single post in there. Let them scream until they're blue in the face. In there, and nowhere else, and that's pretty damn effective, no? If they want to take part in the rest of the community, they can stop.
Click to expand...
It would be one thing if I could stop alerts from dragging people to their threads ...
 
A

a_skeleton_03

<Banned>
29,948
29,765
pharmakos said:
i don't see how keeping them quarantined to the shaw isn't effective. if you're worried about whether or not they change their behavior in a long term sense, well, they don't need to -- if they never change, then keep them permanently on RRP.
Click to expand...
It would be one thing if I could stop alerts from dragging people to their threads ...
 
khalid

khalid

Unelected Mod
14,071
6,775
a_skeleton_03 said:
We have people begging to increase our numbers but when we have people that never learn from their "punishment" the new people aren't going to stay.
Click to expand...

Voting for this because you want less moderation puts the mods in a bad place. It means that if there is something that requires "punishment" then we have to ban the user instead of simply RRP them. Which I guess we can do, it just doesn't seem the best route to me. It seems that is what people want though, probably because they haven't thought it through.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
P

Picasso3

Silver Baronet of the Realm
11,333
5,323
a_skeleton_03 said:
I get that from a user standpoint but from an admin standpoint you can see why I want some defined rules and for a "punishment" to be effective right?

Can you all not see that?

We have people begging to increase our numbers but when we have people that never learn from their "punishment" the new people aren't going to stay.
Click to expand...

If the new people are so retarded that they ignore a forum/thread that they don't like then they're not the members we're looking for
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users
A

a_skeleton_03

<Banned>
29,948
29,765
khalid said:
Voting for this because you want less moderation puts the mods in a bad place. It means that if there is something that requires "punishment" then we have to ban the user instead of simply RRP them. Which I guess we can do, it just doesn't seem the best route to me. It seems that is what people want though, probably because they haven't thought it through.
Click to expand...
And the democracy will be enforced but yes they do not understand.
 
Tarrant

Tarrant

<Prior Amod>
16,146
9,615
jihodj said:
You mistake honesty for anger because you are dishonest, and are so used to being lied to in your life.

Sorry not sorry. All you get from me is hard truths spoken plain. You interpret that as anger, thats all you.
Click to expand...

You can say that all you like but you come off as the single most triggered person on this forum. *shrug*
 
  • 3Like
  • 1Solidarity
Reactions: 3 users
Alkorin

Chancellor Alkorin

Part-Time Sith
<Granularity Engineer>
6,052
10,317
jihodj said:
There would have to be a conversation here, instead of you making arguments from your ignorance that have been rebutted 1000 times before, and then expecting us to repeat ourselves endlessly because you need help catching up.
Click to expand...

No, not quite. Your views are intractable, so there's really no point in having any kind of discussion with you. At least, not on this subject. So, I'm done trying. Have a good day, sir, and may your ignore button never wither.

a_skeleton_03 said:
It would be one thing if I could stop alerts from dragging people to their threads ...
Click to expand...

All things are technically possible. Well, maybe not all things, but I'm pretty sure this one is possible, anyway. If Xenforo wasn't so bloody expensive I'd go try to do it right now.
 
P

Picasso3

Silver Baronet of the Realm
11,333
5,323
khalid said:
Voting for this because you want less moderation puts the mods in a bad place. It means that if there is something that requires "punishment" then we have to ban the user instead of simply RRP them. Which I guess we can do, it just doesn't seem the best route to me. It seems that is what people want though, probably because they haven't thought it through.
Click to expand...

You say this a lot. And it doesn't make any sense. Did you see my previous reply?
 
pharmakos

pharmakos

soʞɐɯɹɐɥd
<Bronze Donator>
16,305
-2,233
khalid said:
Voting for this because you want less moderation puts the mods in a bad place. It means that if there is something that requires "punishment" then we have to ban the user instead of simply RRP them. Which I guess we can do, it just doesn't seem the best route to me. It seems that is what people want though, probably because they haven't thought it through.
Click to expand...

what sorts of things in your opinion would require punishment by banning? i'm okay with permabans for people doing illegal shit on the boards. i don't follow the gamergate thread, but i find it hard to believe that anything Tanoomba did in there was worthy of a permaban over an RRP.
 
  • 1Faggotry
Reactions: 1 user
Ryanz

Ryanz

<Banned>
18,901
52,945
Confining someone to the shaw is the effectiveness of the "punishment". Continued offence within a certain period of time of being unshawed = longer shawing.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
Zapatta

Zapatta

Post Shitter
<Gold Donor>
90,283
496,561
The Shaw should be the South Side of Chicago, move the shitbags there and let them fires shots at each other all day. Any regular citizen who goes down that part of town should know there is a good chance they will see blood and catch a few strays. The police should never go in.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
Status
Not open for further replies.