Tea Time and Trotsky Talk with Tolan

  • 'Tis the season Guest, the season for FoH Moderator elections!

    Make your way to the Moderator Campaigning and Voting Forum and create your thread now!

    Do you have what it takes to keep FoH great?
  • As you probably know Guest, the site was set to a redirect to 8kun on Friday Dec 6th. The cause of this is still being investigated.



    If you are still having issues with redirects, clear your browser cache dating back to a point before Dec 6th and FoH should be functional for you again. Thank you for your patience in this matter - FoH Staff

khorum

Murder Apologist
21,586
68,933
132d 18h 4m
He makes up nazi rules as he goes along, to which he alludes just a few posts ago.

Are you regretting summoning him to this discussion to mic-drop all of your gaslit posts yet?
LOL I didn't summon him at all, that's also up there in our uneditable posts.

He just came along to rattle the monkey's cage and laugh at you. Some of us just stick around to throw in an occasional banana.
 

Tolan

Member of the Year 2016
<Banned>
7,249
2,038
2d 43m
Even better, since you've obviously resorted to your usual tactic of sliding threads down with shitty one-liners to bury your unfailing capacity for embarassing faceplants, I'll just repost the salient posts. Here's one:

-----

LMFAO what was that "original one" then? It's as straightforward an exchange as it could get. You asked this:



And I showed you that YES, since Bernie's "MESSAGE" is that "The issue of wealth and income inequality is the great moral issue of our time " then by his own estimation a man who earns 1000% of the poverty level in the United States, and thus belonging in the top 1% of earners that Bernie constantly demonizes, would be IMMORAL----and thus his own actions would negate his message.

Can you show us all the strawman in that argument? That's Bernie's "message", and sure enough that's Bernie's $1.1million/year top-one-percenter income. I don't need a strawman bludgeon when it's right there for all to see: by his own standards Bernie is an immoral hypocrite on the "wrong side of history", and yeah that negates his message.

----

You STILL haven't shown us where the "strawman" was at any point in the whole arc of that discussion Tolan. C'mon you got a whole month in here.
Now your attempting to rewrite history? Good try, Khorum.
 
  • 2Salty
Reactions: DrSpooge and khorum

Tolan

Member of the Year 2016
<Banned>
7,249
2,038
2d 43m
LOL I didn't summon him at all, that's also up there in our uneditable posts.

He just came along to rattle the monkey's cage and laugh at you. Some of us just stick around to throw in an occasional banana.
PM’s don’t show up in threads, do they?
 
  • 2Salty
Reactions: DrSpooge and khorum

Tolan

Member of the Year 2016
<Banned>
7,249
2,038
2d 43m
Khorum, calm down and say a few serenity-nows. I suggest watching Nader peel back the layers on our rotten onion of a society:

 
  • 2Salty
Reactions: DrSpooge and khorum

khorum

Murder Apologist
21,586
68,933
132d 18h 4m
Now your attempting to rewrite history? Good try, Khorum.
We CAN'T rewrite shit in this thread, dumbfuck. I can't edit those posts to sneak in a Strawman just so you could find it. I can repost and edit them, here, find the strawman in this:

---

What strawman was I boomeranging back to, Tolan?

Bernie not only claims to be a dishevelled, independent champion of the poors, you asked if his ONE-PERCENTER income negates his "message". Well his message is this:
Bernie Sanders said:
The issue of wealth and income inequality is the great moral issue of our time
That's his gandhi-like "message" you were referring to in the question I responded to:

Tolan said:
What makes you think his income negates his message?
If "wealth and income inequality" is the GREAT MORAL ISSUE of our time, then how is it moral for a man to earn 1000% of poverty level in the USA?

That is Bernie's message Tolan, it's an appeal to moral authority and yes, it is ___ABSOLUTELY___ negated by his hypocrisy.

---

There, where's the strawman I constructed to BTFO your stupidity there?
 
  • 1Salty
Reactions: pharmakos

khorum

Murder Apologist
21,586
68,933
132d 18h 4m
Khorum, calm down and say a few serenity-nows. I suggest watching Nader peel back the layers on our rotten onion of a society:

LOL a fucking has-been socialist on the propagandist arm of the Russian State is what calms YOU down huh?
 
  • 1Salty
Reactions: pharmakos

Tolan

Member of the Year 2016
<Banned>
7,249
2,038
2d 43m
LOL a fucking has-been socialist on the propagandist arm of the Russian State is what calms YOU down huh?
Sadly, RT is light-years more objective than our shadow-corporate-run state-run corporate-media. You should give RT a chance. I’m sure you’ll find it enlightening.
 
  • 2Salty
Reactions: DrSpooge and khorum

khorum

Murder Apologist
21,586
68,933
132d 18h 4m
Sadly, RT is light-years more objective than our shadow-corporate-run state-run corporate-media. You should give RT a chance. I’m sure you’ll find it enlightening.
So let's review here. Tolan, you promote the idea that Trump was in collusion with the Russians while simultaneously accepting news from the acknowledged propaganda arm of the Putin regime AS FACT?
 
  • 1Salty
Reactions: pharmakos

Tolan

Member of the Year 2016
<Banned>
7,249
2,038
2d 43m
We CAN'T rewrite shit in this thread, dumbfuck. I can't edit those posts to sneak in a Strawman just so you could find it. I can repost and edit them, here, find the strawman in this:

---

What strawman was I boomeranging back to, Tolan?

Bernie not only claims to be a dishevelled, independent champion of the poors, you asked if his ONE-PERCENTER income negates his "message". Well his message is this:


That's his gandhi-like "message" you were referring to in the question I responded to:



If "wealth and income inequality" is the GREAT MORAL ISSUE of our time, then how is it moral for a man to earn 1000% of poverty level in the USA?

That is Bernie's message Tolan, it's an appeal to moral authority and yes, it is ___ABSOLUTELY___ negated by his hypocrisy.

---

There, where's the strawman I constructed to BTFO your stupidity there?
Whew, man... Khorum. I know you’re against the ropes and all, but you should really heed this coaching: Tyen has gone to jail
 
  • 2Salty
Reactions: DrSpooge and khorum

Tolan

Member of the Year 2016
<Banned>
7,249
2,038
2d 43m
So let's review here. Tolan, you promote the idea that Trump was in collusion with the Russians while simultaneously accepting news from the acknowledged propaganda arm of the Putin regime AS FACT?
Nice pivot Khorum. Where did you get that cockamamie idea?
 
  • 1Salty
Reactions: DrSpooge

khorum

Murder Apologist
21,586
68,933
132d 18h 4m
Nice pivot Khorum. Where did you get that cockamamie idea?
From some fucking retard:

Sadly, RT is light-years more objective than our shadow-corporate-run state-run corporate-media. You should give RT a chance. I’m sure you’ll find it enlightening.
So YOU BELIEVE if Russia Today, which is the propaganda arm of the Putin Regime, is "light-years" more reliable than western media, how are we supposed to interpret that as something other than your acceptance of their message as more factually accurate.

Noone's surprised that you'd watch fucking RUSSIA TODAY for your latest dose of Ed Shultz and Abby Martin's virulent anti-american Socialist agitprop, so how is it "cockamamie" that you don't accept their horseshit as FACT?
 
  • 1Salty
Reactions: pharmakos

Tolan

Member of the Year 2016
<Banned>
7,249
2,038
2d 43m
From some fucking retard:



So YOU BELIEVE if Russia Today, which is the propaganda arm of the Putin Regime, is "light-years" more reliable than western media, how are we supposed to interpret that as something other than your acceptance of their message as more factually accurate.

Noone's surprised that you'd watch fucking RUSSIA TODAY for your latest dose of Ed Shultz and Abby Martin's virulent anti-american Socialist agitprop, so how is it "cockamamie" that you don't accept their horseshit as FACT?
Now you’re sound like one of Hillary’s crazy Russia-gate cheerleaders.
 
  • 2Salty
Reactions: DrSpooge and khorum

khorum

Murder Apologist
21,586
68,933
132d 18h 4m
Now you’re sound like one of Hillary’s crazy Russia-gate cheerleaders.
Oh? You just admitted you believe RT, the propaganda arm of the Putin Regime, to be more factually, objectively accurate than our "corporate shadow-government" media. And ___I'm___ the russia-gate cheerleader?

LMAO c'mon dude, you take all your information from DemocracyNOW! and RT, anyone with a passing acquaintance with their product can see it dripping off every post you've ever made that was longer than a sentence.

You asked us to "give RT a try", why back away from your Ed Shultz and Abby Martin anti-American propaganda now?
 
  • 1Like
  • 1Salty
Reactions: fanaskin and pharmakos

Tolan

Member of the Year 2016
<Banned>
7,249
2,038
2d 43m
Oh? You just admitted you believe RT, the propaganda arm of the Putin Regime, to be more factually, objectively accurate than our "corporate shadow-government" media. And ___I'm___ the russia-gate cheerleader?

LMAO c'mon dude, you take all your information from DemocracyNOW! and RT, anyone with a passing acquaintance with their product can see it dripping off every post you've ever made that was longer than a sentence.

You asked us to "give RT a try", why back away from your Ed Shultz and Abby Martin anti-American propaganda now?
RT is not anti-American. It’s anti-corporate-lies, which might actually qualify as American these days... so maybe you have an accidental point.
 
  • 2Salty
Reactions: DrSpooge and khorum

khorum

Murder Apologist
21,586
68,933
132d 18h 4m
RT is not anti-American. It’s anti-corporate-lies, which might actually qualify as American these days... so maybe you have an accidental point.
ROFL let's start with some basic common ground.

You ARE aware that Russia Today is a fully-owned media organ of the Putin Regime right? I hope you're not disputing that, RT is absolutely owned and operated by the Russian State and has ranking GRU members from their military intelligence directorate in its day-to-day management.

TIME said:
Putin founded RT in 2005 with a budget of about $30 million and gradually ramped it up to more than $300 million per year by 2010. (By comparison, the BBC World Service Group, which includes TV, radio and online news distribution, has a budget of $376 million for 2014–15.
Care to dispute that at all? We can move on to qualitative discussion about their content, but that's an key point we need to establish.
 
  • 1Salty
Reactions: pharmakos

Tolan

Member of the Year 2016
<Banned>
7,249
2,038
2d 43m
ROFL let's start with some basic common ground.

You ARE aware that Russia Today is a fully-owned media organ of the Putin Regime right? I hope you're not disputing that, RT is absolutely owned and operated by the Russian State and has ranking GRU members from their military intelligence directorate in its day-to-day management.



Care to dispute that at all? We can move on to qualitative discussion about their content, but that's an key point we need to establish.
Ok?
 
  • 2Salty
Reactions: DrSpooge and khorum

Archmage Lightning Lord Rule

Lightning Fast
<Charitable Administrator>
4,145
19,558
112d 19h 53m
I did make a final solution joke, only card-carrying Nazis would ever joke about something like that.

And khorum khorum has the right of it, he didn't PM me, I watch threads in the shaw from time to time.

 
  • 1Worf
  • 1OK, Sure
Reactions: Tolan and khorum