Commander Vimeseh_sl
shitlord
- 2,122
- 3
Now we get to see how far the pats and Brady fight back. Kraft has got to be pissed that his boy Roger allowed this to happen.
Only due to so much cheating!Brady comes back week 5 for game vs Indy.
Pats 64 Indy 0
And here we all thought the Pats were pros at cheating, but apparently they trusted this mastermind plan to some dumb-fuck calling himself "The Deflator." Holy lol.The NFL also indefinitely suspended the two equipment staffers believed to have carried out the plan, including one who called himself "The Deflator."
I think its Brady's choice to appeal his personal suspension though. Most of the time there's going to be a reduction.Pat's said they would accept whatever punishment was laid down. I assume they thought the NFL would get too crazy though.
Yeah, Pats will probably take the fine and draft picks without a fight, because it would make Kraft look bad to fight it. Brady will definitely appeal the games, though.I think its Brady's choice to appeal his personal suspension though. Most of the time there's going to be a reduction.
I mean, unless they actually weren't systemically cheating....Yeah, Pats will probably take the fine and draft picks without a fight, because it would make Kraft look bad to fight it.
In the context of him saying the Pats would accept any punishment.I mean, unless they actually weren't systemically cheating....
the sad thing is you're seriousHonestly I think the Bills could. Or Dolphins..
I hadn't heard there was evidence of under inflated balls for years. All the evidence saying so really changes things for me.Yeah, the it was just the first half against the Colts. It definitely wasn't for years like all the evidence says
Exactly. of course it didn't change anything in outcomes because there wasn't an incredibly close game the week before that could have only been won with some soft balls. Nothing like that happened at all....Yeah, the it was just the first half against the Colts. It definitely wasn't for years like all the evidence says
Hard to tell what you're trying to say here, but it seems like you're saying the Wells Report said there were non-cheating reasons the footballs could have been as low as they were? Because that's the exact opposite of what the Wells Report said.Peter King actually had a good article that pointed out the article laid out a bunch of science and totally ignored it, because the science in the Wells Report showed the footballs could have legit been in that approximate range they were measured at.