nevergone
Low IQ Vegan Pacifist
- 3,658
- 7,849
The Moral Superiority Thread: How much better are Vegans?
- Thread starter ZyyzYzzy
- Start date
nevergone
Low IQ Vegan Pacifist
- 3,658
- 7,849
TJT
Mr. Poopybutthole
- 41,051
- 103,074
nevergone
Low IQ Vegan Pacifist
- 3,658
- 7,849
From a purely environmental, carbon emissions standpoint, I guess.
Still a pretty nasty and unnecessary business though.
hodj
Vox Populi Jihadi
- 31,672
- 18,377
I know once I watched COWSPIRACY: The Sustainability Secret (tm), I was forced by my revulsion at the agriculture-industrial complexes crimes again cattlekind to become a hard core vegan, and also I'm full paleo.
So my daily meal regime includes five small (300 kcal or less) meals of acorn nuts and dry wheat grass smoothies, plus a cheat meal of soy and quinoa on Saturdays.
Thanks to all the people involved in COWSPIRACY for opening my eyes to the evils of the industrial meat industry!
So my daily meal regime includes five small (300 kcal or less) meals of acorn nuts and dry wheat grass smoothies, plus a cheat meal of soy and quinoa on Saturdays.
Thanks to all the people involved in COWSPIRACY for opening my eyes to the evils of the industrial meat industry!
nevergone
Low IQ Vegan Pacifist
- 3,658
- 7,849
You should be ashamed of your unhealthy environmentally unsustainable eating habits.
nevergone
Low IQ Vegan Pacifist
- 3,658
- 7,849
A real vegan survives on universal good will and positive energy.
You're consuming too many resources. Too taxing on our ecology.
- 1
Soygen
The Dirty Dozen For the Price of One
- 28,326
- 43,170
hodj
Vox Populi Jihadi
- 31,672
- 18,377
nevergone
Low IQ Vegan Pacifist
- 3,658
- 7,849
Lithose
Buzzfeed Editor
- 25,946
- 113,035
This is not how fucking carbon greenhouse additions work, god damn. The sources cows turn into atmospheric carbon are part of the carbon cycle. The entire issue behind anthropomorphic climate change is adding sequestered sources that were outside of our evolutionary period to the cycle, shifting the climate from the one we've adapted to.
Cows eating grass, then the grass regrowing using CO2 (Or methan converted in the troposphere or soil into CO2) is not "adding" anything to the cycle unless you're removing forest for gazing land, which we don't (And most places don't except for SA, but that's only after the land is destroyed for farming). It's the shit we pull out of the ground that causes the change.
nevergone
Low IQ Vegan Pacifist
- 3,658
- 7,849
hodj
Vox Populi Jihadi
- 31,672
- 18,377
Are...you seriously trying to appeal to the authority of Harvard as a justification for denying the actual research, which indicates that multivitamins do nothing whatsoever for the average person's health?
Even the Harvard source admits there is no proof of benefit, only that there might be potential benefit there, so you should do it anyway?
And the source I cited cites multiple government agencies whose entire responsibility is public health oversight. As well as many of the papers being cited being from one of the top journals for internal medicine in the field?
You really are dumb as fuck aren't you?
Kiroy
Marine Biologist
- 34,666
- 100,125
You've shifted over primarly to only the environmental aspect pretty quickly, which is smart because there are arguements to be made. On the health aspects, you are a full of shit know nothing holier than though, lying, low information soft headed queef fart.
- 2
hodj
Vox Populi Jihadi
- 31,672
- 18,377
Annals of Internal Medicine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Impact Factor[edit]
According to the Journal Citation Reports, Annals' most recent (2014) Impact Factor is 17.810 - the highest of any specialty journal in the Thomson Reuters "General and Internal Medicine" category. Currently, Annals is ranked fourth among 153 general medicine journals, making it one of the most highly cited and influential journals in the world.[1]
This is the source for many of the papers cited in my second link. Its only one of the most important medical journals in the world.
But hey, some unnamed person at Harvard said "Go ahead, take lots of supplements with no proven benefits anyway, it can't hurt, right?" so we should just ignore all that.
Impact Factor[edit]
According to the Journal Citation Reports, Annals' most recent (2014) Impact Factor is 17.810 - the highest of any specialty journal in the Thomson Reuters "General and Internal Medicine" category. Currently, Annals is ranked fourth among 153 general medicine journals, making it one of the most highly cited and influential journals in the world.[1]
This is the source for many of the papers cited in my second link. Its only one of the most important medical journals in the world.
But hey, some unnamed person at Harvard said "Go ahead, take lots of supplements with no proven benefits anyway, it can't hurt, right?" so we should just ignore all that.
