I think Nintendo and Atlus are the only two that I have ever heard take any action against youtubers and streamers. Im sure there are more.
Nintendo had a creator program where, I guess, Nintendo reviewed the content being put out and would take a cut of the monetized profit.. More than 50% iirc. Nintendo decided to shut it down and get with the times. Only really ask that the content creator put their own flair on it rather than a straight uploaded video gameplay in simple terms.. I think that's probably a unanimous agreement between developers and content creators nowadays. I do know Nintendo is still pretty iron fist in a round about way. They're definitely not afraid to send c&d's out left and right.
Atlus wasn't much as the whole company, but iirc the release of Persona 5 had takedowns because they didn't want the game to be spoiled ect and to let sometime pass. It wasnt a very favorable thing by the consumers, but I don't know what actually happened as an end result.
So they technically have the ability to do so, and prevail.. For the most part, the amount of games that exist.. People would just fuck off and play another game at that point. It's essentially PS4 vs Xbone, a large portion of sales were forfeited because people didn't like "digital only" idea despite probably still owning a large digital library.
Other than that, I think the only other thing in recent has been that if you're sponsored or being paid to promote, it has to be said somewhere within the title, tag, or mentioned? I don't know the specifics on it, but I believe it has something to do with the FCC. I'd imagine if a person was licensed by a game developer, it'd follow under the same rules.. And if I remember, some viewers pull out some hate for accepting money4play from companies.. But it's more or less petty bullshit.