None. God > Sexual degeneracy. I ain't even trying on any level.
If I were to date someone and fall in love with someone, it'd be a woman. The last woman I loved and got frisky with is pictured in the RL Picture thread with me iirc... have a gander if you're bored.
Men are 100% completely off the table. The thing is (and make no mistake I have the receipts to prove it) if I
were a homosexual male (like some retards here have claimed) and if I were
not a Christian with 0 care of sexual morality, I would have the ability to get booty blasted virtually nightly by all sorts of men. That is a complete fact. The thought disgusts me... and thank God.
But don't listen to Sevens above... he has 0 actual clue what he's talking about by calling me a recovering homosexual. Patently false.
But I think you're
really asking where do I fit on your semi-unscientific chart.
I think it seems to definitely be believable what's presented there and I've been well aware of Ray Blanchard's work, but here's the deal... I've seen too many people on BOTH sides debunking his work and calling it kinda quack medicine and research. ...and when I say both sides, I mean left-wing radical "in the community" trannies staunchly denying this stuff as well as the medical community due to too much overlap of markers to justify its use in any applicable or predictable way.
I, for one, think there's about as much truth to it as some of Freud's work. I.E. It's not very set in stone scientifically, and there's multiple instances of overlap with these purported two camps (me for example). Let's ignore the pictures (because it's really just a and just focus on the idea of what justifies these classifications. It would seem to make sense to people who aren't fully privy to the exact nature of Gender Dysphoria but there's too much incongruencies for me to say
"Yes, Ray Blanchard's work is how it is and true, and AGP and homosexual trannies are totally separate and dichotomous groups." I can't, and neither can a lot of other rational people who study this stuff.
But........... AGAIN, you wanted to know where I fit on your little picture chart thingy. Here I am:
- Heterosexual Male, yes, but not sexually aroused at myself. I've never once played with my boobs.
- A male partner does complete a superficial idea of womanhood, but that's literally Biblical and biological, not due to anything with this dumb chart.
- I do have a chunky IQ.
- I'm not autistic, and I'm not too into male things (sports, tools, guns, hunting, barbecuing (LoL) etc. etc. etc.
- I pass well
- I didn't transition to attract men... in fact I didn't transition due to anything to do with sex... it was ALL to curb Gender Dysphoria
- I had some femininity since childhood, but not overtly femme like a gay person
- Crossdressing before I transitioned actually disgusted me
- Again, I have a chunky IQ
- Never wanted to do prostitution but that's a moral, free-will, degeneracy issue, not a "transsexual typology" thing.
- Again, I go out in public all the time and get gendered female 100% of the time.
So as you can see, I have a bit of both... and I can see why people dismiss the validity of Blanchard's work. But hey... If you want to classify me as either AGP or homosexual yourself, go ahead, I really don't care as I know who I am, and so does God, and that's all that really matters in the end.
Truly... in the end, that is everything. Me and God. That's it.
Vanessa when did you stop sucking dick?
