Vanessa's Tranny AMA Blog Thread
- Thread starter AngryGerbil
- Start date
- Status
- 40,545
- 171,257
Vanessa
Uncle Tanya
- 7,689
- 1,417
I don't need to photoshop things to make it "e-real", sorry. Reality once again favors me and bites others in the ass. Pity.
- 1
Furry
WoW Office
- 19,448
- 24,483
I did what any sane person would do in this situation, and uploaded about 300 pictures of honkler. The first was an error, the second and error, and so it went. Eventually I found chief honkler, and a score was produced. From there I googled man in wig and picked the first black one. Just doing some science.
Seems the scorer heavily penalizes wrinkles and unbalanced features. I could probably smear some brown around to even things out in paint shop and get the man on a wig up to a 9, but that is beyond the scope of tonights entertainment.
Seems the scorer heavily penalizes wrinkles and unbalanced features. I could probably smear some brown around to even things out in paint shop and get the man on a wig up to a 9, but that is beyond the scope of tonights entertainment.
Vanessa
Uncle Tanya
- 7,689
- 1,417
LoL
That's why I'm so amused at my result. Was a one and done thing. Boom. I love reality... honestly just found the first pic I rummaged through my HD that was 'straight on' (I usually take 45 degree side pics I've noticed when doing selfies but I guess most women do) and just thought, yeah, why not? These are fun and I haven't tossed one of my pics into these things in a few years honestly.
Yup. I could probably dig through really old folders and find some jpegs of results I had when I first started transitioning. They had very primitive facial recognition software sites back then. It was funny because all the non passable trannies had the cognitive dissonance going on, saying how pointless, stupid, and invalid the sites were haha. But nope... they just couldn't deal with reality. Doing them honestly yielded honest results... I knew. I had a rough time in the beginning stages of all of this too but I was always... different, I dunno. Realistic, right-winged in nature, Christian.
But I digress..................... this is all beyond the scope of tonight's entertainment, yes?
Furry
WoW Office
- 19,448
- 24,483
You scored better than Honkler? fucking amazing. I'd upload my picture... but nope I wouldn't, I'm not retarded.LoL
That's why I'm so amused at my result. Was a one and done thing. Boom. I love reality... honestly just found the first pic I rummaged through my HD that was 'straight on' (I usually take 45 degree side pics I've noticed when doing selfies but I guess most women do) and just thought, yeah, why not? These are fun and I haven't tossed one of my pics into these things in a few years honestly.
Yup. I could probably dig through really old folders and find some jpegs of results I had when I first started transitioning. They had very primitive facial recognition software sites back then. It was funny because all the non passable trannies had the cognitive dissonance going on, saying how pointless, stupid, and invalid the sites were haha. But nope... they just couldn't deal with reality. Doing them honestly yielded honest results... I knew. I had a rough time in the beginning stages of all of this too but I was always... different, I dunno. Realistic, right-winged in nature, Christian.
But I digress..................... this is all beyond the scope of tonight's entertainment, yes?
DickTrickle
Definitely NOT Furor Planedefiler
- 12,875
- 14,759
Well shit, color me convinced. Any AI beauty test that places Scarlett Johansson, Gal Gadot, and Margot Robbie below Vanessa is surely a flawless AI that may just pass the Turing test.
- 6
- 2
- 1
DickTrickle
Definitely NOT Furor Planedefiler
- 12,875
- 14,759
This site is hilarious. I'm trying to figure out what it's looking for to break it. I feel like I'm really starting to get there now!
<-- Just slightly less attractive than ScarJo!
See, AI is smart and AI is dumb. This is putting an extremely high priority on facial symmetry in lieu of everything else. The top three in this example come from a google search for "symmetrical ugly face". This is why famous actresses in real photos give surprisingly low scores but photos like the above (or Vanessa's) that has a high level of symmetry and balance can score very highly.
See, AI is smart and AI is dumb. This is putting an extremely high priority on facial symmetry in lieu of everything else. The top three in this example come from a google search for "symmetrical ugly face". This is why famous actresses in real photos give surprisingly low scores but photos like the above (or Vanessa's) that has a high level of symmetry and balance can score very highly.
- 2
- 1
DickTrickle
Definitely NOT Furor Planedefiler
- 12,875
- 14,759
I think you place way too much face in some random website's facial AI software. It also helps that you're wearing a ton of makeup and either that or camera effects is smoothing out your face so you have almost no facial features. Your nose is barely indistinguishable from your face.
You dropped 3/4th a point from a slightly different crop!
I'm not saying this to be mean, but that this isn't as declarative as you think it is.
You're more attractive than the person you made an obsessive video about!
I'm sure you'll just take from this what makes you feel better and everyone who dislikes you will do the same, but as someone who actually works with machine learning and AI somewhat frequently (though not for image processing), none of these results surprise.
- 1
Sevens
Log Wizard
- 4,966
- 15,164
View attachment 354386
I thought we were all for reality, my friends? Numbers and stats and stuff.
"Fuck you Vanessa for ruining my worldview with FACTS... I hate you"
I know...
Thankssadris you've been one of the preeminent posters here and I love you.
You say you have nothing to hide and you don't lie but
Your face is so coated in makeup nothing of what you look like can even come through and you are listed as "female" which is a lie.
- 1
Vanessa
Uncle Tanya
- 7,689
- 1,417
Fucker
Log Wizard
- 11,517
- 25,993
That's not makeup. That's photoshop. It is plainly obvious. One cannot hide massive levels of man ugly with any amount of makeup.
This guy gets more pathetic by the day. And boy, I told you all the guy looks a hag in real life. He'd look bad for 60, and he's 42. This is what a lifetime of drug and alcohol abuse looks like.
- 2
- 1
DickTrickle
Definitely NOT Furor Planedefiler
- 12,875
- 14,759
DickTrickle
Definitely NOT Furor Planedefiler
- 12,875
- 14,759
And you go right back to "hatertots" when I think I made a pretty compelling case with multiple pieces of evidence why that website is hilariously flawed. I literally slightly cropped the same photo you used and it resulted in nearly a point of difference. That is not indicative of reliability yet alone accuracy.
- 2
Furry
WoW Office
- 19,448
- 24,483
Sevens
Log Wizard
- 4,966
- 15,164
Are you actually implying that the photo you used for this stupid website your face wasnt coated in makeup?
You are a fake conservative
You are a fake christian
you are a fake woman
you are a fake human
You are fake
- 1
Vanessa
Uncle Tanya
- 7,689
- 1,417
I don't. I was a few years younger then and I had a different phone with different settings. Every girl out there that I know that is in their 40s uses some touch of pre-filter. That is NOT the same as photoshop obviously. Pretty sure some of you boys have never once taken a selfie heh.
Dude... I 100% realize I'm not some 300k followers instagram level thot; never was, never will be but newsflash: They use filters and photoshop on a professional level. I legitimately don't, short of default shit on my phone. THAT'S why you asshats saying I'm using globs and globs of makeup is hilarious, and is a helluva compliment but you don't even realize you're complimenting me (hence: keep it up... I love the hatertots; you guys reveal yourselves subtly... and I'm kinda you know... fucking smart).
Reality is blissful to me, I assure you. I HAVE gained weight since... oh... March 2020 and I'm not gonna lie about that either. Stress eating no doubt!! Not like, FAT by any means, but I'm definitely pudgy now haha. I'm 42... again, reality is blissful to me. Make no mistake.
I feel incredibly connected to the world/politics/God/society ... i.e. the zeitgeist. It's weird... when the world hurts, I hurt. ...and 2020 sucked. Sucked complete ass. Like a rift split the spiritual world in two... not saying it's the "end times" but holy shit folks... open your eyes at least and get prepared; atheism is so "I'm stuck in 2011 and woke on Hitch, Dillahunty, and will soon fall in love with TJ Kirk!" like you're riding some wave of cognitive freedom, the male pseudo-intellectual version of burning your bra. You're not... you're still under God's thumb whether you like it or not.
- 1
- Status