brekk
Dancing Dino Superstar
- 2,191
- 1,746
I've won after a board clear on all my rezzed demons, from out-surviving in fatigue. A 6 health swing is big when neither side has much left.
- 2
Hearthstone
- Thread starter Azrayne
- Start date
I've won after a board clear on all my rezzed demons, from out-surviving in fatigue. A 6 health swing is big when neither side has much left.
zzeris
King Turd of Shit Hill
- 18,869
- 73,622
1. Sunkeeper needs some kind of fix unless they fix all of the other issues with paladin. I like the thoughts of making 2/2s with Baku and having Sunkeeper the opposite cost of even pally. At 6, its power level is off the charts with any form of swarm strategy and single-handedly crushes big minion decks.
2. Cube- dark pact for 3 would do it. I'd say even dark pact for 2 and heal for only 6 might be fine as well but at 3 it's just an easier fix. That slows the deck down significantly and prevents the issues we keep seeing.
3. Guldan is fine.
4. Quest rogue shows they don't test shit... just look at stats. Well people aren't playing it so our broken interaction must be fine...until two weeks later and the rest of that meta.
5. Spiteful- I really like the spell cost limit. Force these decks to use lower cost, less valuable and swingy cards. UI, which is already a ridiculously powerful card, having even more value in a deck is utterly retarded. Hearthstone is a RnG tempo based game. So giving several decks, who already have good tempo cards, a broken interaction makes very little competitive sense.
Great ideas guys. I'm now 100% positive Blizzard fucks this up.
2. Cube- dark pact for 3 would do it. I'd say even dark pact for 2 and heal for only 6 might be fine as well but at 3 it's just an easier fix. That slows the deck down significantly and prevents the issues we keep seeing.
3. Guldan is fine.
4. Quest rogue shows they don't test shit... just look at stats. Well people aren't playing it so our broken interaction must be fine...until two weeks later and the rest of that meta.
5. Spiteful- I really like the spell cost limit. Force these decks to use lower cost, less valuable and swingy cards. UI, which is already a ridiculously powerful card, having even more value in a deck is utterly retarded. Hearthstone is a RnG tempo based game. So giving several decks, who already have good tempo cards, a broken interaction makes very little competitive sense.
Great ideas guys. I'm now 100% positive Blizzard fucks this up.
- 2
TJT
Mr. Poopybutthole
- 40,942
- 102,764
I would also agree that nuking Dark Pact and forcing Warlock to rely on ratcatcher for their triggers. Slowing them down and reducing their absurd healing. This would also make the Cubelock more tolerable.
- 1
Xequecal
Trump's Staff
- 11,559
- -2,388
I still think it's mind-boggling how Blizzard allowed mechanics to be printed that are so powerful that people will play them even if they do nothing a significant percentage of the time. Like, Spiteful Druid is a Tier 1 deck despite the fact that the interaction that it's based around does absolutely nothing 33% of the time that you cast it. The same was true for Patches, people would play Patches and Southsea Captain as the only pirates in a deck, even though that meant Southsea Captain would whiff a third of the time.
- 2
Valishar
Molten Core Raider
- 766
- 424
Heh think about Prince Keleseth where he's only good 26-30% of the time when you get him down turn 2. Also, in spiteful druid. I hate that highroll deck.
- 1
Ravishing
Uninspiring Title
- 8,452
- 3,577
Ravishing
Uninspiring Title
- 8,452
- 3,577
Yup, I'm in fortnite mode now. Only doing 1 daily a day and might not even do that soon.
- 1
Origin
Molten Core Raider
- 874
- 773
- 16,390
- 7,391
Have you considered dusting your collection and quitting?
If it was a sufficient way to build a collection, I probably would have been fine doing dailies-only like I do now in Gwent. I have a suspicion(that I don't really care to confirm) that if I played Gwent as much as I played Hearthstone, I'd be just as frustrated.
If it was a sufficient way to build a collection, I probably would have been fine doing dailies-only like I do now in Gwent. I have a suspicion(that I don't really care to confirm) that if I played Gwent as much as I played Hearthstone, I'd be just as frustrated.
- 1
Brand
Molten Core Raider
- 1,159
- 313
It is just frustration speaking for those guys. The game hasn't fundamentally changed since it came out. It has all the same issues....You either can live with it, or you can't.
- 1
TJT
Mr. Poopybutthole
- 40,942
- 102,764
I think the meta always gets stale. But this current round just has some really annoying decks that rely on huge RNG rolls for insane tempo swings you can't stop (all Spiteful decks) or insane value decks (paladin, warlock).
Between Witchwood and Kobolds expansion they just made some cards that created some absurdity. Which is why we have a huge round of nerfs coming at the end of the month.
- 1
Ravishing
Uninspiring Title
- 8,452
- 3,577
It's not the worst ever, but it's just boring.
Like I'm pretty sure almost 0 Witchwood cards see play other than Genn/Baku
There has been much worse. Pirates vs Reno is probably the most hated/worst meta ever
- 1
- 1
Origin
Molten Core Raider
- 874
- 773
To each their own. But the consensus among a lot of the pros is that the meta is shit. The card pool is so small and one deck is dominating and limiting too many others.
Last time i quit was at the start of Un'goro, when quest rogue was dominating. I don't think it's that bad atm, but it's really bad.
- 1