Long full disclosure
- Thread starter GaliemVaelant_foh
- Start date
You"re the most gigantic fool on earth, congratulations.
I dunno why you are asking for advice since you have repeatedly shown yourself to be incapable of taking it. Instead you jump from pan to fire to lava all the while wondering how you got there. In comparison you make the underpants gnomes look like Richard Feynmann.
I now know why my state, Arizona, is so completely fucked up the last few years. Your presence. I puke a little just knowing you two live/lived in my city.
My advice? Beg for change on the street until you get enough for a passport. Have someone help you fill out the application and move to a country with no extradition treaty and get the job you seem perfect for, horse urine taste tester.
Good luck!
I dunno why you are asking for advice since you have repeatedly shown yourself to be incapable of taking it. Instead you jump from pan to fire to lava all the while wondering how you got there. In comparison you make the underpants gnomes look like Richard Feynmann.
I now know why my state, Arizona, is so completely fucked up the last few years. Your presence. I puke a little just knowing you two live/lived in my city.
My advice? Beg for change on the street until you get enough for a passport. Have someone help you fill out the application and move to a country with no extradition treaty and get the job you seem perfect for, horse urine taste tester.
Good luck!
Wife-swap:Leviothan said:
Grobbee takes Galiems Troll and moves to Mongolia where the beast will be milked daily
Aamina takes Grobbee since all Aamina wants is someone to suck his dick
Galiem takes Grobbee"s vagina clown car baby factory
Everyones happy!
Fucking take it down a notch assburger. I was directing my comment towards Shelly and the unborn child. We all know you don"t draw SSI because you harp on it every chance you get. But no fuck that, by sticking your dick in some crazy bitch that has AL LEAST a 50% chance to give birth to a child with defects you are contributing to the "drain on the system". It is unfair to society and more importantly it is unfair to the child.GaliemVaelant said:
To summarize, fuck you.
Big Phoenix
Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
- 44,601
- 93,130
Galiem, what happened to the previous girl you where with, the ones at the very start of your HoS thread.
Deserved. Sorry man.MaulNutz said:
Turns out Circle-K wasn"t over charging me when she went out to grab smokes for us. Although they did pay me back that one time, she was out smoking meth. I found out right about the time I noticed large amounts of money missing without explanation (one of her friends slipped and told me), and I left without discussion. Now I know why she never slept, but she got twitchy just from drinking coffee and was rather laid back most of the time, so I don"t get it. Living with a tweeker? Fuck that. I"d rather live with Shelly again.Pheonix said:
Also, Rathar: I"m not in Arizona. I"m in Louisiana. Fuck this place. Seriously. Richard Feynmann wouldbecomean underpants gnome if he lived here. Ever watch True Blood? Sans supernatural shit, that sums this place up well. Especially season 3.
I just want to point out that your math skills are as poor as your choice in women.GaliemVaelant said:
What the fuck you apologize?! Now I can"t flame you dammit =pGaliemVaelant said:
For real though, you need to up your standards for women. If that means jerking it to porn for a while so be it.
healthy, autism, autism+WMS, WMSSheaf said:
75% of which include a genetic disorder. So, where did I go wrong? Both methods give the same result.
edit: Fuck it, I"m going to find my statistics textbook.
Final edit: Yes, I had it right. The child has a 50% chance of having WMS and a 25% chance of having autism. After it is determined whether the child has, say, autism, there is still a 50% chance that the child will have WMS. Because the disorders are unrelated, they sum. The chances of a completely healthy child is then the complement of the set of elements where the child is not healthy. Finding the odds of the child having both is more complex. That case is 1/3 of the non-healthy elements, which make up 75% of the total set of possible outcomes, but we can"t apply that directly either. This is where I"m a bit unsure but I don"t have time to restudy an entire course-worth of material for this post, so if you"ve got sound mathematical advice then point me in the right direction. Shortened the post a bit.
Let me try and dumb this down for you. Take four objects and lay them out on your desk in front of you. Half of them get disorder A, so choose two and set them aside. You now have two groups of two. Now apply disorder B to a random one of the four objects. See how half the time disorder A and disorder B overlap?GaliemVaelant said:
Now let"s say disorder A has a 50% chance and disorder B has a 50% chance. Is every single kid going to have a genetic disorder? Get it now? You can"t just add the percentages.
So it"s 62.5%. That was my first guess, but a specialist she is seeing during this pregnancy told me that they sum since they"re unrelated. This means that the statistics for a healthy baby are 75% of the 50% where WMS does not happen, 37.5%, which sums with 62.5% for 100% thus proving it right.Sheaf said:
Why did this specialist tell me this was wrong? He said it don"t work that way with genetics, and there wasn"t time to get him to explain. You know, this same specialist told me that a placental abruption can not be the result of a connective tissue disorder. I wonder if he"s wrong about that too. Shelly"s mom had a placental abruption while pregnant with her but not with her other children who do not have WMS, so it seemed to me that the tissue connecting the placenta to the uterus would be weakened if the fetus has WMS. Doc wouldn"t even consider the possibility as an early indicator.