May users have a personal thread in the rickshaw?

May users have a personal thread in the rickshaw?

  • Yes

    Votes: 271 66.6%
  • No

    Votes: 136 33.4%

  • Total voters
    407
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Lithose

Buzzfeed Editor
25,946
113,041
Yes, personal threads in the Shaw are fine. Its the very least people can do to ignore someone is to not visit their shit hovel in the shaw.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

LulzSect

Well-Known Memer
<Banned>
2,714
3,282
i mean wasn't the rickshaw intended as forum jail for infractions? :lumie:
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Daezuel

Potato del Grande
24,696
58,174
I'll have to catch up on this thread but once again it appears the community has spoken, let's see if it makes any difference.
 

a_skeleton_03

<Banned>
29,948
29,765
This is no true shared common sense, though, as the results of this poll seem to be indicating thus far. This is why polls are glorious (if still imperfect).

Also, I was hardly ever on a warpath. I didn't even approach 1/50th of a Hodjening. I'm just like the guy that posts more on Meta Stack Overflow than Stack Overflow.
Just because a vote goes one way does not make that the common sense.

Just look at the mods that all ran on "common sense" and "loose moderation" yet we have Tanoomba in RRP without a single warning given.
 
  • 3Like
Reactions: 2 users

Brikker

Trump's Staff
6,416
5,079
We "elected" mods that are some of the most prolific arguers with Tanoomba, it's no surprise whatsoever that he was rickshawed within the first week.
 

brekk

Dancing Dino Superstar
<Bronze Donator>
2,197
1,758
Does this mean that their thread within RRP is the only place they can post?
 

Zapatta

Post Shitter
<Gold Donor>
90,283
496,561
Banner needs a Geocities Fire border around it, and the site name should be changed to Fires of Banners
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

Noodleface

A Mod Real Quick
38,658
16,721
The rickshaw is a cesspool and should be treated as such. We went mostly hands off there (no CP, among other things) and let it grow organically with the population of users there being the fertilizer.

That said I voted 'no' to be difficult.
 

Picasso3

Silver Baronet of the Realm
11,333
5,323
No, but maybe it should.

Unless the doctor starts up the rehabilitation program again.

It'd just be adding another layer of separation. If threads are not intended to be shit, they shouldn't be in the rickshaw. Shit threads for shit posters. If someone wants to make a shit thread after themselves, why stop them? If they want to shit post in someone else's shit thread, why stop them? If someone else wants to shit post in their personal shit thread, why stop them? These are the 3 shit pillars of the shaw
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

DickTrickle

Definitely NOT Furor Planedefiler
13,744
16,111
Just because a vote goes one way does not make that the common sense.

Just look at the mods that all ran on "common sense" and "loose moderation" yet we have Tanoomba in RRP without a single warning given.

I happen to think Khalid's action was wrong. Tanoomba should have gotten a warning first instead of Khalid's "oh, we know you'd keep it up so I just fast forwarded!" That was bad moderation. This was a fresh start so despite Tanoomba's history he should have been given the same process as anyone else.

The second warning could have very well been on Tanoomba's next post (and third on the one after that), but the rules should still have been followed.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

Chancellor Alkorin

Part-Time Sith
<Granularity Engineer>
6,052
10,317
How do they win if they're confined to shitposting in a place where no one cares?
 
  • 1Solidarity
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 users

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
I happen to think Khalid's action was wrong. Tanoomba should have gotten a warning first instead of Khalid's "oh, we know you'd keep it up so I just fast forwarded!" That was bad moderation.

So Tanoomba gets a warning. Maybe he stops right then, maybe he doesn't.

Say he does.

He stops today. Comes back tomorrow morning, restarts the same stupid debate in the same thread at 10 o'clock in the morning, keeps it up for another 3 days, gets another warning, disappears for the rest of the day, comes back the next day, does it again.

When does it end, exactly, Dick?
 

hodj

Vox Populi Jihadi
<Silver Donator>
31,673
18,384
How do they win if they're confined to shitposting in a place where no one cares?

Except people do care.

You may not care, but enough people care that they're throwing a huge shit fit here over one or two threads, some of them that went dormant on the old site by the way for years (Looking at you there Picasso), when one or two of them get locked to shut down a serial shit poster in the midst of a mental breakdown.
 

Zapatta

Post Shitter
<Gold Donor>
90,283
496,561
Is this all because of TanoomBrat?, I think he 'wins' anytime he is given attention, so atm, He's Charlie Sheen.

And by that I mean he has AIDS
 
  • 2Solidarity
  • 2Like
Reactions: 3 users

DickTrickle

Definitely NOT Furor Planedefiler
13,744
16,111
So Tanoomba gets a warning. Maybe he stops right then, maybe he doesn't.

Say he does.

He stops today. Comes back tomorrow morning, restarts the same stupid debate in the same thread at 10 o'clock in the morning, keeps it up for another 3 days, gets another warning, disappears for the rest of the day, comes back the next day, does it again.

When does it end, exactly, Dick?

You can set a time on the warnings, right? I didn't think they were hard set at 3 days. Even so. That means he gets one high quality shitpost in once a day. Problem solved?
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user
Status
Not open for further replies.