you keep getting locked up here. even the self righteous can take a hint.The righteous need no saving.
Keep getting? When was the last time? My month long “sentence” here will likely be commuted once the mods come to their senses again.you keep getting locked up here. even the self righteous can take a hint.
So this is Tolans little jack off thread?
Because is MESSAGE is about Income Inequality, you fucking mongoloid. Earning 910% of the poverty level LITERALLY negates your message about poverty levels.What makes you think his income negates his message?
I call it censorship, or a media-blackout at best. Can’t let Tolan have access to the mainstream threads when there’s a moderator election on the line.Some call it a jack off thread, others call it a quarantine.
No it doesn’t, you strawman artist.Because is MESSAGE is about Income Inequality, you fucking mongoloid. Earning 910% of the poverty level LITERALLY negates your message about poverty levels.
No it doesn’t, you strawman artist.
No, I clearly asked “what makes you think” such erroneous bullshit.What strawman did you imagine I constructed just now? I answered your exact question.
You asked very clearly why his income levels negate the veracity of his message and I told you why. In fact, 900% of poverty level just reflects his conventional salary, accounting for all his capital gains and his wife's investments, they pull in just over $1.1 million every year, that's 1,000% of the poverty level in the US ($11k/year).
That goes beyond hypocrisy, it directly undermines any authority on Income inequality he may have had since he left that Israeli kibbutz in the late 60s.
No, I clearly asked “what makes you think” such erroneous bullshit.
You do realize that you guys are just about the worst offenders of objective discussion, right?
The false approximation is that someone earning $1m/yr can’t advocate for socioeconomic justice.And I answered it as directly and correctly as possible. You obviously have no idea what a strawman fallacy is. Let me help you. That would be when I would construct a FALSE APPROXIMATION of an argument and debate that false strawman instead. When you asked why Bernie Sanders earning $1.1 million dollars per year negates his message, I answered precisely thus:
"Because his MESSAGE is about Income Inequality," (TRUE) "you fucking mongoloid" (ABSOLUTELY TRUE).
Do you just doubt that he earned $1.1million every year for the last couple years? Because he absolutely did. There's nothing erroneous about that.
So where is this strawman you imagine I was swatting at?
Wrong. We can't edit our posts in your new home, Tolanbro.The false approximation is that someone earning $1m/yr can’t advocate for socioeconomic justice.
“False authority” is your straw-man. You can keep circular-referencing it all you want. It doesn’t make your straw-man any less weak.Wrong. We can't edit our posts in your new home, Tolanbro.
Your question I was responding to was "What makes you think his income negates his message?" It's right up there in all its glory.
He can ADVOCATE for it as much Al Gore advocates for lower carbon footprints while his private jet and four mansions emit more carbon than a coal refinery. But the question I was absolutely NOT strawmanning was why earning 1,000 percent of a poor family's income would negate his message of solidarity with people living in poverty. And just as with Gore's hypocrisy, Bernie's lavish ONE-PERCENTER lifestyle absolutely negates his false authority on income inequality.
“False authority” is your straw-man. You can keep circular-referencing it all you want. It doesn’t make your straw-man any less weak.
What makes you think his income negates his message?
CNBC said:That would place Sanders — whose website says that "the issue of wealth and income inequality is the great moral issue of our time, it is the great economic issue of our time, and it is the great political issue of our time" — in the unusual position of being among the top 1 percent of earners in the U.S.
Wrong. We can't edit our posts in your new home, Tolanbro.
Your question I was responding to was "What makes you think his income negates his message?" It's right up there in all its glory.
He can ADVOCATE for it as much Al Gore advocates for lower carbon footprints while his private jet and four mansions emit more carbon than a coal refinery. But the question I was absolutely NOT strawmanning was why earning 1,000 percent of a poor family's income would negate his message of solidarity with people living in poverty. And just as with Gore's hypocrisy, Bernie's lavish ONE-PERCENTER lifestyle absolutely negates his false authority on income inequality.