Woman who was getting her box munched on in public now claiming rape
- Thread starter Wuyley_sl
- Start date
TrollfaceDeux
Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
- 19,577
- 3,743
Famm
Ahn'Qiraj Raider
- 11,041
- 794
On the other hand I think I saw a video of Chomsky defending ultra PC language policing on college campuses because a campus is the students' "home" and no one should ever have to feel offended (or I guess more fairly to his point, discriminated against) in their home.
Not sure what anti feminist point that fifth video is supposed to make but all I took from it is that the guy was an absolute total dickhead, and not in the good, thoughtful, entertaining way like Hitchens or Maher.
Not sure what anti feminist point that fifth video is supposed to make but all I took from it is that the guy was an absolute total dickhead, and not in the good, thoughtful, entertaining way like Hitchens or Maher.
Cad
scientia potentia est
- 24,498
- 45,439
The persons own dorm room might fairly be considered their home, although if they share it with a roommate then they have even less of an expectation of privacy... but the whole campus? Thats pretty ridiculous...
TrollfaceDeux
Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
- 19,577
- 3,743
no, just "complaint." police got involved later on. will probably charge if she has sufficient evidence to press for one, but probably won't. College, on the other hand, can expel him.
She acts like she got him so good too. REMEMBER THAT?????
And that Christopher Hitchens video is pretty frustrating. All he said was they don't HAVE to work. Nobody has to do anything they don't want, how the fuck is that sexist.
And that Christopher Hitchens video is pretty frustrating. All he said was they don't HAVE to work. Nobody has to do anything they don't want, how the fuck is that sexist.
TrollfaceDeux
Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
- 19,577
- 3,743
I think it may be interpreted as sexist since Hitchens believes that female sex is the gentle sex (not true. females are equally, if not more, violent domestically and their method of violence is different from men).
But that is not what is funny about this video. What is funny is that if sexism is interpreted as working against women, it is "sexism" and you are bad (i.e. female sex is gentle sex. they are good at being housewives). But if it is to benefit women (i.e. women are better negotiator and more female politicians and CEO would make for a better world, they are "gentler" so they would make great addition to police force, and other shit) they are all over it.
Hypocrisy aside, Hitchens is a Wakandan.
Caliane
Avatar of War Slayer
- 14,626
- 10,140
yes definitely.
that is the caveat of the Tumblr feminist. Like any hipster that just parrots dumb shit they read on someones blog without actually having any knowledge the basis for the statements right or wrong, a good deal are in fact attractive 20 somethings.
Are you talking about retroactive rape? So this chick obviously is willing and enjoying the public munching, but if she decides in the last 5 seconds that it is a huge mistake and unwanted, the whole thing was "rape"?
It would be public indecency in OH. I'm not sure if this is one of those where an officer has to witness the crime in person or not though. Similar to other cases where they couldn't actually charge anyone just based on a video.
Edit: It's also only a 3rd degree misdemeanor so no idea if they'd even bother.
Edit: It's also only a 3rd degree misdemeanor so no idea if they'd even bother.
hodj
Vox Populi Jihadi
- 31,672
- 18,377
The girl Laurie Penny, attacked Starkey first if you pay attention to the video. She's a super radical feminist in Europe, he's a homosexual Monarchist with a heavy drinking problem. She tried to call him a racist and some other things, he fucking demolished her shit by exposing her hypocritical nature. Watch the video again and listen to what Starkey says about how in England you give your time freely when you're a public figure to things like debates, and she was demanding a massive sum of money to show up when he was offering to do it for free. Basically she was being a money grubbing skank who tried to personally attack Starkey, he pushed her shit in, she cried about it.
You are literally the only person I've ever heard of watching that video and thinking she was in the right. Even during the video, the AUDIENCE is screaming at her that her self righteous indignation isn't justified because she started slandering Starkey first.
Tuco
I got Tuco'd!
- 45,489
- 73,576
He probably could have said it more gently. Either he means, "Personally I feel a responsibility to earn money for my family and wouldn't want my wife to be in a position where she needs to go out and work.". Or he means, "The men go out and work and the women should stay home. If the woman absolutely needs to go and have a 'career' they can go I guess."
TrollfaceDeux
Pronouns: zie/zhem/zer
- 19,577
- 3,743
why do people glorify career so much. it's just more fucking work. why not househusband. the fuck man.
Famm
Ahn'Qiraj Raider
- 11,041
- 794
I didn't say she was "in the right" per se, she seemed cunty enough herself. But that dude was way over the top, even given your explanation, which I did glean a bit from context and I noticed everything you mentioned. I just consider completely losing your temper in a public forum like that to be a losing move even if you occupy the winning position. He came across as incredibly rustled and just a run of the mill asshole to me. I don't particularly like the whole pedestalization of being "English" and all that tradition horseshit either. Dude seemed pompous and pretentious even if she is a little weasel.