j00t
Silver Baronet of the Realm
- 7,380
- 7,481
Looking at the WHO site and the ICD-10, and how they classify stuff... this all just seems silly tbh.
First off, I'm assuming Gaming Addiciton falls under : F63 Habit and impulse disorders (http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/bluebook.pdf?ua=1)
The other categories here are:
F63.0 Pathological gambling
F63.1 Pathological fire-setting [pyromania]
F63.2 Pathological stealing [kleptomania]
F63.3 Trichotillomania
F63.8 Other habit and impulse disorders
F63.9 Habit and impulse disorder, unspecified
They could easily just put Gaming under "other", but because the industry is so big, I guess they want a new category.
But we don't see other big items like Facebook/social media addiction, Television addiction, Sports, etc etc.
Even Gambling/Fire-setting/Stealing need to be Severe: "pathological": "involving, caused by, or of the nature of a physical or mental disease. "
So technically it should be titled "Pathological gaming"
Yes I do believe there are people that have a gaming disease, but it will be very few, just like Gambling. Does it warrant a spot here?
Gambling / Fire-setting / Stealing all have larger consequences than Gaming...
At least imo.
I just think it's silly and Gaming should fall under "other" for as long as TV/Sports/Hobbies are all classified together under "Other".
In fact I think "Social Media Addiction" and/or "Smart Device/Cellphone Addiction" warrants a spot much more than Gaming.
At least in the US, the icd-10 is basically just for insurance purposes. I'm wondering if there's some funding benefits for why they would push to isolate gaming over social media/mobile use or whatever...
Either way, what's the harm from making it it's own thing? I'm genuinely asking, it doesn't seem like a big deal to me?