Get a free Kyle Rittenhouse at Culver's
- Thread starter Nirgon
- Start date
- Status
Zapatta
Krugman's Fax Machine
- 76,330
- 397,047
popsicledeath
Potato del Grande
- 7,439
- 11,677
Not one person questioned it until his trial attorney brought it up? And questioning the meaning of the law is being whacked out on hopium?
Can you make a coherent point without absurd hyperbole?
Pretty sure questions about the legality of him possessing the rifle were being discussed here from the beginning. And I know for a fact it was being discussed in other places. So not sure why you're making that dumb assertion.
Like I've said, you may be right, but your inability to show your work and reliance on hyperbole undermine your credibility.
Personally, if he is in violation of possession laws then I think he should be convicted of those violations of law.
- 2
OneofOne
Silver Baronet of the Realm
- 6,623
- 8,088
Yeah, what am I thinking, I forgot Lithose washes cars for living.
- 1
Arbitrary
Tranny Chaser
- 27,134
- 71,936
If Kyle was black the Right would loudly and publicly be able to proclaim how based he was which they would do.
- 6
- 3
- 1
AladainAF
Best Rabbit
- 12,864
- 30,813
Just like the judge kept saying and has been stated multiple times here, you have to use the full statute, not just that one part. You have to read 3(c).
He's not in violation of 941.28. He is not in compliance with 29.593 (his defense admits this) but he IS in compliance with 29.304 because 29.304 only applies to those under 17.
To be factually guilty of violating 948.60, he must be in violation of 941.28 OR he must be out of compliance WITH BOTH 29.304 AND 29.593.
This is what the judge repeatedly kept telling the prosecution, which they kept choosing to ignore.
- 6
- 2
Gavinmad
Mr. Poopybutthole
- 42,377
- 50,434
AladainAF
Best Rabbit
- 12,864
- 30,813
AladainAF
Best Rabbit
- 12,864
- 30,813
This is EXACTLY What the prosecution tried to say to the judge and the judge kept saying you can't ignore the (3)(c) exemption. What you're doing here, and what the prosecution tried to do, is to simply ignore that exemption and say "it doesn't apply" because the two laws that it references are for things that don't qualify what Kyle was doing. Laws just don't work like that (Obviously, Cad can correct me here). An exemption is an exemption. The law is probably written poorly. If it was worded such as "or is in the act of hunting or target practice and not in compliance with 29.304 and 29.593" then you'd be correct, because hes not in the act of hunting or target practice. It doesn't say that though, and so the only logical outcome here is that it applies to all acts.
It's very clear to me.
- 4
Gavinmad
Mr. Poopybutthole
- 42,377
- 50,434
Fuck man I've read that shit at least a dozen times tonight, why would the thirteenth suddenly read differently? I think the intention of the law is the way I've been interpreting it, but you seem to be right about the way it's written and that's what matters.
This is why juries are so goddamn dangerous. I'm not a stupid man, but hell if I wasn't completely convinced until reading the exact same passage for the umpteenth time suddenly caused a breakthrough. Now imagine if I was charismatic and forceful instead of an obnoxious shitposter, and how easily I could have swayed other jurors.
- 3
- 1
- 1
AladainAF
Best Rabbit
- 12,864
- 30,813
You should see what the judge said about it. It's interesting exchange.
Feel free to watch the exchange, I've timestamped it.
Last edited:
- 1
Stave
Potato del Grande
- 2,095
- 3,955
At this point, I would doubt he would want to be anywhere near the legal system or government ran services that failed him. I know I sure as shit wouldn't want to be. Try to help out your community, help put out fires, help protect businesses, only to end up getting attacked by multiple criminals with zero help, having to save yourself, and then getting the book thrown at you to make an example of you, all while the people you were trying to protect yourself from, walk away with zero charges. Naw fuck that shit, he should go tour the US, do paid appearances, write a book, find some way to do a fundraiser, sue the massive shit out of any news organization that lied about him, and once he's got all that money saved up and stashed away safely, make some sort of comedy skit of him blowing away a bunch of chomos and liberals and antifa just as one last fuck you trigger to the libs, and then disappear into the mountains to grow old in a cabin/bunker stocked for 100+ years.
- 3
- 2
Abigailicious
Lord Nagafen Raider
- 193
- 453
They got drones, satellites and vaccine passports on your spyphone, there is no more frontier, the West is dying. We can't run from tyrants anymore.
- 1
- 1
moonarchia
The Scientific Shitlord
- 21,473
- 39,058
I would say 3(b) would be more applicable. He was part of a local militia group that was there specifically to protect businesses that the cops and National Guard were unwilling or unable to protect from "mostly peaceful" rioters and antifa.
- 1
Phazael
Confirmed Beta Shitlord, Fat Bastard
- 14,110
- 30,207
I honestly think that this would be the ideal outcome to start the ball rolling. The more tyrannical the fed the greater the push back has been and this would be an unprecedented move move to get involved in a local issue essentially. This is particularly true when people start putting together that these agitators taters were effectively working for the fed in the 1st fucking place.4chan /pol brought up an interesting question. If Kyle skates will Biden, who already publicly labeled the kid a White Supremacist send Garland in the drum up some Fed Charges like they had planned to do to Chauvin if he walked.
- 2
- 1
- Status