Exempt from the stipulations ofcourse. Have you not being paying attention? I understand it's convenient for your to reduce the case to the avatar while at the same time it's claimed the bet is the center of it. Dissonance?
I'm sorry, I thought you were the one reposting your own posts here?
Conflation here. Seems Burnem was the one playing stupid games - he had to have you all and Tuco affirm this. How do you even know Araysar is Russian? Dishing - that could and should be said of the one who agreed to the bet and all those who, as it seems here, apparently, got the stipulations changed after the fact. Injustice.
Is this the same Jay Cutler? (I don't sports)
Maybe we can compromise a bit to make everyone happy?
That would seem fair, from the horses mouth, sure.Araysar_sl said:
By your logic, we could remove putin from that picture and you could claim it's not a cutler avatar because it's cutler wearing a bears uniform and cutler wearing a bears uniform isn't the same as just cutler. Basically, you have the mistaken idea that the presence of something other than cutler makes it no longer a cutler avatar.
Sure we have to agree what a thing is. This is, also, a disagreement over what a thing is. Do you think it's a Cutler avatar. Or do you think it's a Cutler and Putin having an intimate moment avatar? Do you think it looks like Cutler's natural habitat? Or Putin's? What kind of logic are we, you, Tuco, others, applying here?
The whole point of avatar bets is humilation and gloating over said humiliation. It's a Cutler avatar.
