Slaythe
<Bronze Donator>
- 3,389
- 141
This is where you're taking this? Really?And Curry's only been on one team so you really can only say Curry makes the Warriors better -- not any/every team.
This is where you're taking this? Really?And Curry's only been on one team so you really can only say Curry makes the Warriors better -- not any/every team.
Well he has been on multiple teams so you can at least examine the argument.Nick Young makes every other team better.
SwaggyP4MVP
Are you being intentionally dense? I was incredulous because I thought popsicle was making a silly claim about Harden and I said what I did to highlight how silly it sounded when applied in a similar way to Curry. He already clarified his meaning in a post and I already clarified my revised understanding in a post so I don't know why you're responding to that piece now.This is where you're taking this? Really?
Yeah, I quoted before reading the follow ups. Sorry. Your original tone flew completely over my head. Apologies.Are you being intentionally dense? I was incredulous because I thought popsicle was making a silly claim about Harden and I said what I did to highlight how silly it sounded when applied in a similar way to Curry. He already clarified his meaning in a post and I already clarified my revised understanding in a post so I don't know why you're responding to that piece now.
Harden is good but I really don't think he is MVP good. Curry does more for his team than Harden.
I think Curry is ultimately the better player and maybe MVP, but the entire Rockets team is built around James Harden. If an entire team is built around a player, it's hard to argue that player doesn't do a shit ton for his team.Harden is good but I really don't think he is MVP good. Curry does more for his team than Harden.
Or maybe MVP is a single season award and basing it off what a team did last year makes absolutely no sense?Why didn't he lead them to way more wins last year? The team is largely the same. If your answer doesn't have 100% to do with only Curry related changes, then maybe using "most wins" without any other context as a primary determinant is a little bit shallow.
So who should have won MVP last year? Tim Duncan or Kawhi Leonard?Or maybe MVP is a single season award and basing it off what a team did last year makes absolutely no sense?
You are confusing nba fans with pats fans again.You faggots are why people blow up our towers.
Not sure why my choice for MVP has you so butthurt that you have to strawman it. When an MVP race is close and one of the players has 10+ wins on the other guy, that's a pretty good tiebreaker.So who should have won MVP last year? Tim Duncan or Kawhi Leonard?
The point of my comment was that the coaching regime play has clearly has a big effect on the record. However, ifyou're really one of those types that think the MVP must come from the team with the best record, I guess there's really not much to argue.
There have been a lot of great players on average teams that put up good or even great stats and ultimately take their teams nowhere. There's a difference between a team standing back and letting a great one-on-one player go to work, versus a team that designs an entire system around a player especially when that players individual stats may even drop to make the team better. And there's a reason why players on perennial championship contenders are considered all-time greats when their stats may not be as good as some other dude who's the only guy putting up numbers on a shitty team.I think Curry is ultimately the better player and maybe MVP, but the entire Rockets team is built around James Harden. If an entire team is built around a player, it's hard to argue that player doesn't do a shit ton for his team.