Void
Experiencer
- 9,409
- 11,072
I can't imagine a thumbnail like that being anything but completely serious and not clickbait!
- 2
- 1
Science!! Fucking magnets, how do they work?
- Thread starter Flunklesnarkin_sl
- Start date
chthonic-anemos
bitchute.com/video/EvyOjOORbg5l/
- 8,590
- 27,182
I liked when the dots fled civilization and went to live in the wilderness.
- 1
Furry
WoW Office
- 19,456
- 24,531
Why do dead people give pressure on the living in his simulations? It's cute, but not well thought out.
Asshat wormie
2023 Asshat Award Winner
- 16,820
- 30,963
Here you go smooth brain:
If you look at 5 you will see the -k*i(t) term. This is the change in the number of recovered or dead (those that cant get the disease anymore one way or another) people at each time step. The number of recovered (or dead) reduces the number of those who can still get sick and thus there is a "pressure" on the remaining population.
Of course I am 95% certain you just looked at images bouncing back and forth, called it pressure and spewed stupid shit into this thread. But its ok, the -k*i(t) term is a negative number and thus is incredibly confusing if ones brain is smooth. Dont be concerned, we understand.
- 1
Furry
WoW Office
- 19,456
- 24,531
lol, here comes the super genius. 2000 years of mathematical theorization. Nah fuck that, some guy made a video.Here you go smooth brain:
If you look at 5 you will see the -k*i(t) term. This is the change in the number of recovered or dead (those that cant get the disease anymore one way or another) people at each time step. The number of recovered (or dead) reduces the number of those who can still get sick and thus there is a "pressure" on the remaining population.
Of course I am 95% certain you just looked at images bouncing back and forth, called it pressure and spewed stupid shit into this thread. But its ok, the -k*i(t) term is a negative number and thus is incredibly confusing if ones brain is smooth. Dont be concerned, we understand.
- 1
Asshat wormie
2023 Asshat Award Winner
- 16,820
- 30,963
As opposed to some furry who has dismissed both the fields of physics and epidemiology in their entirety so far. Relax smooth brain, anyone with above average IQ here already knows you are a retard, you cant hide it so there is no need to pretend.
- 1
Fucker
Log Wizard
- 11,518
- 26,008
The only breakthrough Mudcrush is waiting for is a cleaner that will remove his dad's lipstick off his cock without having to scrub hard.
- 1
- 1
- 1
iannis
Musty Nester
- 31,351
- 17,656
- 1
Asshat wormie
2023 Asshat Award Winner
- 16,820
- 30,963
Some complex numbers arent real, but all real numbers are complex!
pharmakos
soʞɐɯɹɐɥd
- 16,306
- -2,239
It does sort of add well to the whole "the human race was originally a genetically engineered slave race developed by an alien civilization" theory. After the aliens abandoned our species here, over time as normal, natural, "chaotic" evolution took over the eumelanin that used to form precise circuits ended up easily losing its synthetic complexity and returned to something resembling life as we know it (the kangz)
- 2
- 1
- 1
Lithose
Buzzfeed Editor
- 25,946
- 113,035
So I've been doing a lot of reading on the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser experiment...Its kind of freaking me out. Anyone got any decent layman books on the subject specifically?
Its freaking me out because I had always assumed that interaction during measurement is what collapsed wave functions. So the "observer" didn't need to actually record data, merely the act of measurement itself brought returned a wave function to a discreet particle. This made sense to me, because to measure something you need some kind of interaction, and I imagined interaction forced the 'wave' to coalesce at a certain point (I know that's not how it really works, its just how I imagined it).
But the delayed choice quantum eraser proved that's not the case. I'm not sure how familiar you guys are with the original quantum slit experiment, but you can look it up on youtube. Here is what is fucking freaky about the delayed choice version. The scientists were able to rig it so the measurement happened but information about the path might have been known or unkown. (They did this with entanglement, video below) Here is the thing...If the data was scrambled, there was a wave pattern...If the data was readable, it was a particle pattern..But the patterns showed up BEFORE it could be known whether the data was readable or not, and the act of measurement itself didn't affect anything.
This violates causality no? It would somehow mean the pattern itself determined whether the data could or could not be recorded...or somehow, the recording of the data affected the pattern in the past from the entangled particle.
Am I just not getting this? Does anyone have a little more information or is more experienced or have some other good source of information?
Its freaking me out because I had always assumed that interaction during measurement is what collapsed wave functions. So the "observer" didn't need to actually record data, merely the act of measurement itself brought returned a wave function to a discreet particle. This made sense to me, because to measure something you need some kind of interaction, and I imagined interaction forced the 'wave' to coalesce at a certain point (I know that's not how it really works, its just how I imagined it).
But the delayed choice quantum eraser proved that's not the case. I'm not sure how familiar you guys are with the original quantum slit experiment, but you can look it up on youtube. Here is what is fucking freaky about the delayed choice version. The scientists were able to rig it so the measurement happened but information about the path might have been known or unkown. (They did this with entanglement, video below) Here is the thing...If the data was scrambled, there was a wave pattern...If the data was readable, it was a particle pattern..But the patterns showed up BEFORE it could be known whether the data was readable or not, and the act of measurement itself didn't affect anything.
This violates causality no? It would somehow mean the pattern itself determined whether the data could or could not be recorded...or somehow, the recording of the data affected the pattern in the past from the entangled particle.
Am I just not getting this? Does anyone have a little more information or is more experienced or have some other good source of information?
Last edited:
- 1
You should watch the show Devs if you aren’t already. It’s fiction but they have a good team teaching them about quantum mechanics. It’s not about this thing you are talking about but it does mention the split beam and a bunch of other experiments. They do some neat theoretical stuff in the show.
- 1
pharmakos
soʞɐɯɹɐɥd
- 16,306
- -2,239
Wikipedia just says "If a photon in flight is interpreted as being in a so-called "superposition of states", i.e. if it is interpreted as something that has the potentiality to manifest as a particle or wave, but during its time in flight is neither, then there is no time paradox. This is the standard view, and recent experiments have supported it."
I've a lot more reading to do tho...
Tholan
Blackwing Lair Raider
- 776
- 1,473
A step toward explaining why/how matter won over antimatteré. TLDR : an experiment showed a big difference between neutrinos and anti-neutrinos
www.interactions.org
T2K Results Restrict Possible Values of Neutrino CP Phase
- 3
Sentagur
Low and to the left
- 3,825
- 7,937
Its because of the simulation optimization processes. The high precision rendering is reserved only for stuff being actively observed the rest is just estimated with placeholders until its observed.
Limitation to save on hardware usage, just like the speed of light and the switch that turns off the light in the fridge when the door is closed.
- 2
chthonic-anemos
bitchute.com/video/EvyOjOORbg5l/
- 8,590
- 27,182
