Thief Review The Sham Burglar | Lazygamer .:: The Worlds Best Video Game News ::.overall reads like a decent game with them falling flat on creating the "world" as well as the old ones.
And note the same people have a LR review that's worse while it was a very good (albeit niche) game -
Lightning Returns: Final Fantasy XIII review In need of salvation | Lazygamer .:: The Worlds Best Video Game News ::.
LR would get a solid 8 from me, so if their recent history is at all indicative Thief could well be a 8.5 to me. And honestly at the end of the day, who the hell cares what MOST people feel about a game - I don't play the games I choose to for YOUR enjoyment I do it for my own. As long as it's a 7+ game to me is the key, reviewers aren't always right.
Here's bullets from another "bad" review:
+ Core gameplay mechanics are quite enjoyable
+ Allows for full UI and difficulty customization
- Bad voice acting supported with terrible dialogue and sound design
- Weak AI and technical performance
- Odd choices in direction
First is the most important element to Thief being done correctly. Second helps undo any changes to modernize it if they're not wanted. 3 and 5 are basically the same thing and while nice to have aren't exactly the key element to the games they've always been more about the "doing" than the story to them. And on 4 - if I cared to look up Youtube I'm sure I could find dozens of AI oddities that existed in the earlier Thief's the AI being a bunch of dumb idiots that Garret was mocking under his breath quite often was part of the point of the entire mood of the game.
Oddly I've seen length mentioned in a few reviews as terribly short by my standards to the disappointing degree (6-10 without replays) that might be a failing point to me - but so far the positives still sound good and the negatives sound like trivial minutiae they're just trying to trump up for views.
Remember we're in a post "reviewers are too positive all the time" generation where over critical nonsense happens constantly - look at how well AC4 was received, yet it's sitting at 83 Critic and 7.8 User on Metacritic. If Thief's reboot is "10-15% worse" than AC4 it's still an amazing game.
And note: Metacritic currently sitting at 73 for Critics with some reviews 80/82/90. And the first blurb from the Game Informer one "Eidos-Montreal may have adhered too closely to the series' roots, resulting in a reboot that suffers from classic problems like simplistic combat and trial-and-error sneaking missions." GI is apparently worried it's TOO CLOSE to it's roots, not that it's shied far away from them.